Local foraminotomy for decompression as a factor of the spinal motion segment instability development in elderly patients with degenerative scoliosis

Objective. To identify the risk of the spinal motion segment instability after local foraminotomy in elderly and senile patients with lumbar spinal stenosis associated with degenerative scoliosis. Material and Methods. A prospective study included data on 50 patients treated by surgery and 50 patients who underwent conservative treatment in 2013–2017 for leg pain associated with degenerative scoliosis and secondary spinal stenosis. All patients were older than 60 years. Conservative treatment was carried out using vascular drugs, NSAIDs, analgesics, decongestants, and various blockades. In surgery group, patients underwent local foraminotomy for decompression at the involved levels. The average postoperative follow-up period was 3.8 years (from 6 months to 4 years). The study was performed using four-field tables to determine the relative risk. Results. The performed studies showed that there is no statistically significant risk of instability of the spinal motion segment after foraminotomy in the lumbar spine. Conclusion. Local foraminotomy in the lumbar spine is not a risk factor for instability in the spinal motion segment. Local foraminotomy in the area of lumbar spinal stenosis combined with degenerative scoliosis can be recommended for the treatment of patients only in the absence of proven instability in the involved spinal motion segment at the preoperative stage.

[1]  P. Kehr Alexander R. Vaccaro, Richard G. Fessler, Faheem A. Sandhu, Jean-Marc Voyadzis, Jason C. Eck, Christopher K. Kepler: Controversies in spine surgery, MIS versus OPEN , 2019, European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology.

[2]  M. Bond,et al.  Scoliosis Research Society–Schwab Adult Spinal Deformity Classification: A Validation Study * , 2018, 50 Landmark Papers.

[3]  A. Nazarenko,et al.  SEGMENTAL SPINAL INSTABILITY: UNSOLVED PROBLEMS , 2017 .

[4]  S. Glassman,et al.  Revision Rate After Adult Deformity Surgery , 2015, Spine deformity.

[5]  S. Shin,et al.  Surgical Treatment of Adult Degenerative Scoliosis , 2014, Asian spine journal.

[6]  Z. Gokaslan,et al.  Minimally invasive spine surgery for adult degenerative lumbar scoliosis. , 2014, Neurosurgical focus.

[7]  L. Na,et al.  Postoperative Recovery Outcomes in Adult Scoliosis: A Prospective Multicenter Database With 5-Year Follow-Up. , 2014, Spine Deformity.

[8]  Дмитрий Алексеевич Михайлов,et al.  Оценка значимости сагиттального баланса и патологии межпозвонковых дисков в развитии дегенеративных изменений смежных позвоночно-двигательных сегментов после спондилодеза , 2014 .

[9]  Y. Toyama,et al.  Curve progression after decompression surgery in patients with mild degenerative scoliosis. , 2013, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[10]  Y. Ro,et al.  Non-neurologic complications following surgery for scoliosis , 2013, Korean journal of anesthesiology.

[11]  A. Crawford,et al.  Outcomes, Expectations, and Complications Overview for the Surgical Treatment of Adult and Pediatric Spinal Deformity , 2012 .

[12]  P. Guigui,et al.  Complications and Risk Factors of Primary Adult Scoliosis Surgery: A Multicenter Study of 306 Patients , 2012, Spine.

[13]  L. Lenke,et al.  Adult degenerative scoliosis: evaluation and management. , 2010, Neurosurgical focus.

[14]  M. Maltenfort,et al.  Adult scoliosis surgery outcomes: a systematic review. , 2010, Neurosurgical focus.

[15]  R. Winter,et al.  Surgical Outcomes of Decompression, Decompression With Limited Fusion, and Decompression With Full Curve Fusion for Degenerative Scoliosis With Radiculopathy , 2008, Spine.

[16]  A. Mushkin,et al.  Normal and pathological biomechanics of the spine: major aspects , 2009 .

[17]  John R. Johnson,et al.  Lumbar fusion outcomes stratified by specific diagnostic indication. , 2009, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[18]  Эдуард Владимирович Ульрих,et al.  Биомеханика позвоночника в норме и при патологических состояниях: основные аспекты исследований , 2009 .

[19]  K. Cho,et al.  Complications in Posterior Fusion and Instrumentation for Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis , 2007, Spine.

[20]  A. Ploumis,et al.  Degenerative lumbar scoliosis associated with spinal stenosis. , 2007, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[21]  Tom Stanley,et al.  Instrumentation-Related Complications of Multilevel Fusions for Adult Spinal Deformity Patients Over Age 65: Surgical Considerations and Treatment Options in Patients With Poor Bone Quality , 2006, Spine.

[22]  K. Bridwell Decision Making Regarding Smith-Petersen vs. Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy vs. Vertebral Column Resection for Spinal Deformity , 2006, Spine.

[23]  F. Schwab,et al.  Adult Scoliosis: Prevalence, SF-36, and Nutritional Parameters in an Elderly Volunteer Population , 2005, Spine.

[24]  Choll W. Kim,et al.  Spinal instability: the orthopedic approach. , 2005, Seminars in musculoskeletal radiology.

[25]  John R. Johnson,et al.  Perioperative complications of posterior lumbar decompression and arthrodesis in older adults. , 2003, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[26]  E. Hadar,et al.  Long-term follow-up review of patients who underwent laminectomy for lumbar stenosis: a prospective study. , 1998, Journal of neurosurgery.

[27]  F. Postacchini Management of lumbar spinal stenosis. , 1996, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[28]  T. Albert,et al.  Health Outcome Assessment Before and After Adult Deformity Surgery: A Prospective Study , 1995, Spine.