An analysis of muscular load and performance in using a pen-tablet system.

The present paper aims to investigate two characteristics; task performance and muscular load during skill process for the pen-tablet input system with the mouse input system on the PC in order to determine the comprehensive usability for the pen-tablet system. Two computer tasks were designed for the study: task SL and task PT. Task SL was a repetitive computer-drawing including typical mouse motions such as clicking and drag-dropping. Task PT was a polygon tracing task requiring fine-controlled movements with the input device. Surface electromyography (EMG) and performance data were measured during the task. When the pen-tablet was being used, low amplitudes of EMGs for the biceps brachii, the flexor digitorum superficialis, and the extensor digitorum were found, whereas no EMG difference for the trapezius was found for both tasks. On the first day, the performance with the mouse was much higher than the performance with the pen-tablet in terms of error rates and the number of completed trials. However, the performance with the pen-tablet exceeded the performance with the mouse from the second day on, and the subjects performed better with the pen-tablet than with the mouse. Current results imply that the skill process for the pen-tablet system was very short and the subjects felt comfortable to use the new system from the beginning.

[1]  E. Keller,et al.  Ergonomic Evaluation of a Wrist Rest for VDU Work via Electromyographic Methods , 1997, HCI.

[2]  Leo A. Smith,et al.  An ergonomic evaluation of the Kinesis Ergonomic Computer Keyboard , 1994 .

[3]  Mats Hagberg,et al.  Computer mouse and track-ball operation:: Similarities and differences in posture, muscular load and perceived exertion , 1999 .

[4]  Masaharu Kumashiro,et al.  Effects of arm-rest heights on work load with VDT operations , 1996 .

[5]  Nancy A. Baker,et al.  The effect of Video Display Terminal (VDT) mouse use on muscle contractions in the neck and forearm. , 1999, Work.

[6]  A Aarås,et al.  Postural load during VDU work: a comparison between various work postures. , 1997, Ergonomics.

[7]  M. B. Villanueva,et al.  Sitting posture and neck and shoulder muscle activities at different screen height settings of the visual display terminal. , 1997, Industrial health.

[8]  H Emslie,et al.  Text entry on handheld computers by older users , 2000, Ergonomics.

[9]  Alex Chaparro,et al.  A Psychophysical Comparison of Two Stylus-Driven Soft Keyboards , 1999, Graphics Interface.

[10]  B. Visser,et al.  The effect of arm and wrist supports on the load of the upper extremity during VDU work. , 2000, Clinical biomechanics.

[11]  M Hagberg,et al.  Computer mouse position as a determinant of posture, muscular load and perceived exertion. , 1998, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[12]  Marti A. Hearst,et al.  A comparison of the affordances of a digital desk and tablet for architectural image tasks , 2002, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[13]  I. Scott MacKenzie,et al.  Text entry using soft keyboards , 1999, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[14]  E. Peper,et al.  Surface electromyography and mouse use position. , 1997, Ergonomics.

[15]  Hiroshi Udo,et al.  An Electromyographic Study of Two Different Types of Ballpoint Pens , 1999 .

[16]  B. Shneiderman Designing the User Interface (3rd Ed.) , 1998 .

[17]  I. Scott MacKenzie,et al.  A performance comparison of two handwriting recognizers , 1999, Interact. Comput..

[18]  Arne Aarås,et al.  Work Posture and Musculoskeletal Pain , 1997, HCI.

[19]  F Yoshinaga,et al.  An electromyographic study of two different types of ballpoint pens--investigation of a one hour writing operation. , 2000, Industrial health.

[20]  I. Scott MacKenzie,et al.  Alphanumeric entry on pen-based computers , 1994, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..