The effects of generation on item and order retention in immediate and delayed recall

Recent research has shown that generating words from fragments, relative to simply reading them, inhibits processing of order information. Nairne, Riegler, and Serra (1991) showed that this reduction in processing of order information leads to deficits in recall performance. In three experiments, we generally replicate Nairne et al.'s results and demonstrate that the deficit in recall for the generated items is dependent on the easy distractor task and the relatively short (30-sec) retention interval they used. When a difficult distractor task was used, generating produced a deficit in amount of order information processed, but actually facilitated recall when recall was delayed 80 sec. The results are consistent with the hypothesisthat generating words inhibits order processing, but they do not support the contention that the reduction in order pro~ cessing isresponsible for the deficit in recall that is sometimes observed for the generated items.

[1]  Robert A. Bjork,et al.  The Generation Effect: Support for a Two-Factor Theory , 1988 .

[2]  M. McDaniel,et al.  Memory for prose: The influence of relational and proposition-specific processing. , 1984 .

[3]  S. R. Schmidt,et al.  The negative generation effect: Delineation of a phenomenon , 1989, Memory & cognition.

[4]  J. S. Nairne,et al.  Dissociative effects of generation on item and order retention. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[5]  S. Ebenholtz,et al.  The Process of Free Recall: Evidence for Non-Associative Factors in Acquisition and Retention , 1962 .

[6]  J. S. Nairne,et al.  Design controversies and the generation effect: Support for an item-order hypothesis , 1993, Memory & cognition.

[7]  I. Begg,et al.  The generation effect: Evidence for generalized inhibition. , 1987 .

[8]  N. J. Slamecka,et al.  The Generation Effect: Delineation of a Phenomenon , 1978 .

[9]  N. Kroll,et al.  Short-term recall as a function of covert rehearsal and of intervening task , 1972 .

[10]  Mark A. McDaniel,et al.  A contextual account of the generation effect: A three-factor theory ☆ , 1988 .

[11]  J. G. Snodgrass,et al.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[12]  N. J. Slamecka,et al.  The generation effect as an artifact of selective displaced rehearsal. , 1987 .

[13]  James S. Nairne,et al.  Similarity and long-term memory for order , 1990 .

[14]  Daniel J. Burns The generation effect: a test between single- and multifactor theories. , 1990 .

[15]  D. J. Burns,et al.  The consequences of generation , 1992 .