The Third Leg of the Kantian Tripod for Peace: International Organizations and Militarized Disputes, 1950–85

Immanuel Kant believed that democracy, economic interdependence, and international law and organizations could establish the foundations for “perpetual peace.” Our analyses of politically relevant dyads show that each of the three elements of the Kantian peace makes a statistically significant, independent contribution to peaceful interstate relations. These benefits are evident even when the influence of other theoretically interesting factors—such as relative power, alliances, geographic contiguity, and economic growth—is held constant. Increasing the number of shared memberships in intergovernmental organizations (IGOs) by one standard deviation reduces the incidence of militarized disputes by about 23 percent from the baseline rate for a typical pair of bordering states. If both members of a dyad are democratic, conflict is 35 percent less likely than the baseline; increasing both the dyadic trade–GDP ratio and the trend in trade by a standard deviation reduces the chance of conflict by 38 percent. Together, all the Kantian variables lower the probability of a dispute by 72 percent. We check for reverse causation and find reason to believe that a feedback system is at work, with IGOs reducing conflict and low-conflict dyads joining IGOs. Democracies and interdependent states are more likely to join IGOs with one another, bringing together the three elements of a system for Kantian peace.

[1]  Samuel B. Bacharach,et al.  When Knowledge is Power: Three Models of Change in International Organizations. , 1991 .

[2]  J. D. Morrow Modeling the forms of international cooperation: distribution versus information , 1994, International Organization.

[3]  P. Diehl,et al.  The Theory of Collective Action and NATO Defense Burdens: New Empirical Tests , 1994 .

[4]  J. O'neal,et al.  The Classical Liberals Were Right: Democracy, Interdependence, and Conflict, 1950–1985 , 1997 .

[5]  John J. Mearsheimer,et al.  The False Promise of International Institutions , 1994 .

[6]  Susan M. Mcmillan Interdependence and Conflict , 1997 .

[7]  R. Coase The Nature of the Firm , 1937 .

[8]  D. Mitrany A working peace system , 1966 .

[9]  Lisa L. Martin Interests, power, and multilateralism , 1992, International Organization.

[10]  Jonathan Wilkenfeld,et al.  Democracies in international crisis , 1996 .

[11]  Soo Yeon Kim,et al.  The new politics of voting alignments in the United Nations General Assembly , 1996, International Organization.

[12]  Richard T. Cupitt,et al.  The (IM)Morality of international governmental organizations , 1996 .

[13]  M. Finnemore,et al.  International organizations as teachers of norms: the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cutural Organization and science policy , 1993, International Organization.

[14]  G. Ikenberry The Myth of Post-Cold War Chaos , 1996 .

[15]  Lisa L. Martin,et al.  The Promise of Institutionalist Theory , 1995 .

[16]  John A. Vasquez The War Puzzle: PRELIMINARIES , 1993 .

[17]  I. Zartman Collapsed states : the disintegration and restoration of legitimate authority , 1995 .

[18]  Johan P. Olsen,et al.  The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political Life , 1983, American Political Science Review.

[19]  Kenneth W. Abbott,et al.  Why States Act through Formal International Organizations , 1998 .

[20]  Robert O. Keohane,et al.  Multilateralism: An Agenda for Research , 1990 .

[21]  John R. Oneal,et al.  The theory of collective action and burden sharing in NATO , 1990, International Organization.

[22]  Robert O. Keohane,et al.  After Hegemony , 2005 .

[23]  E. Haas,et al.  Beyond the Nation-State: Functionalism and International Organization , 1964 .

[24]  Nathaniel Beck,et al.  Taking Time Seriously: Time-Series-Cross-Section Analysis with a Binary Dependent Variable , 1998 .

[25]  Alexander Wendt Collective Identity Formation and the International State , 1994, American Political Science Review.

[26]  P. Schmidt,et al.  Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. , 1984 .

[27]  Jacob Bercovitch International mediation and dispute settlement: Evaluating the conditions for successful mediation , 1991 .

[28]  S. Bremer Dangerous Dyads , 1992 .

[29]  Takeshi Amemiya,et al.  The Estimation of a Simultaneous Equation Generalized Probit Model , 1978 .

[30]  Zeev Maoz,et al.  Normative and Structural Causes of Democratic Peace, 1946–1986 , 1993, American Political Science Review.

[31]  Cheryl Shanks,et al.  Inertia and change in the constellation of international governmental organizations, 1981–1992 , 1996, International Organization.

[32]  W. Coplin,et al.  The Permanent Court of International Justice, the International Court of Justice, the League of Nations, and the United Nations: A Comparative Empirical Survey , 1972, American Political Science Review.

[33]  O. Young,et al.  The Intermediaries: Third Parties in International Crises , 1967 .

[34]  Inis L. Claude Swords Into Plowshares: The Problems and Progress of International Organization , 1971 .

[35]  Bruce Bueno de Mesquita,et al.  War and Reason , 1992 .

[36]  W. Domke,et al.  War and the changing global system , 1988 .

[37]  Craig N. Murphy International Organization and Industrial Change: Global Governance Since 1850 , 1994 .

[38]  B. Boutros-Ghali An Agenda for Peace , 1992, UN Peacekeeping: A Documentary Introduction.

[39]  James A. Caporaso International relations theory and multilateralism: the search for foundations , 1992, International Organization.

[40]  Gregory A. Raymond Democracies, Disputes, and Third-Party Intermediaries , 1994 .

[41]  Jacob Bercovitch,et al.  The Nature of the Dispute and the Effectiveness of International Mediation , 1993 .

[42]  Bruce Russett,et al.  Democratic Trading Partners: The Liberal Connection, 1962-1989 , 1998, The Journal of Politics.

[43]  Alexander Wendt Social Theory of International Politics: “Ideas all the way down?”: on the constitution of power and interest , 1999 .

[44]  J. Ruggie International regimes, transactions, and change: embedded liberalism in the postwar economic order , 1982, International Organization.

[45]  Karl W. Deutsch,et al.  Political Community And The North Atlantic Area , 1958 .

[46]  William J. Dixon,et al.  Democracy and the Peaceful Settlement of International Conflict , 1994, American Political Science Review.

[47]  Eva Schaper,et al.  Kant's Political Writings , 1970 .

[48]  Harold K. Jacobson,et al.  National Entanglements in International Governmental Organizations , 1986, American Political Science Review.

[49]  Gary Goertz,et al.  Territorial changes and international conflict , 1992 .

[50]  C. Guarneri Cornell University Press , 1991 .

[51]  Ted Robert Gurr,et al.  Transitions to Democracy: Tracking Democracy''s Third Wave with the Polity III Data , 1996 .

[52]  Eva Bertram Reinventing Governments , 1995 .

[53]  Zeev Maoz,et al.  NORMATIVE AND STRUCTURAL CAUSES OF DEMOCRATIC PEACE , 1993 .

[54]  C. Kupchan,et al.  Concerts, Collective Security, and the Future of Europe , 1991 .

[55]  David D. Caron The New UN Peacekeeping: Building Peace in Lands of Conflict After the Cold War. , 1996, American Journal of International Law.