Specialisations of SEQUAL

We have so far in this book described the generic framework (described SEQUAL-Gen in Fig. 6.1) and quality of modelling languages in Chaps. 4 and 5 respectively. As indicate here, a number of specialisations have been made for different types of models.

[1]  Alan M. Davis,et al.  Identifying and measuring quality in a software requirements specification , 1993, [1993] Proceedings First International Software Metrics Symposium.

[2]  John Krogstie,et al.  Quality of Interactive Models , 2002, ER.

[3]  Terry A. Halpin,et al.  Automated Verbalization for ORM 2 , 2006, OTM Workshops.

[4]  Yorick Wilks,et al.  Data Driven Ontology Evaluation , 2004, LREC.

[5]  D. Wood.  How Maps Work , 1992 .

[6]  R. Carnap,et al.  INTERNATIONAL ENCYCLOPEDIA OF UNIFIED SCIENCE. , 1939, Science.

[7]  Harald Wesenberg.  Enterprise Modeling in an Agile World , 2011, PoEM.

[8]  Shoshana Zuboff.  In the Age of the Smart Machine , 1988 .

[9]  G Stix,et al.  The mice that warred. , 2001, Scientific American.

[10]  John Krogstie,et al.  Semantic Annotation Framework to Manage Semantic Heterogeneity of Process Models , 2006, CAiSE.

[11]  Stefania Gnesi,et al.  An Automatic Quality Evaluation for Natural Language Requirements , 2001 .

[12]  C. Morris.  Foundations of the theory of signs , 1938 .

[13]  Remco M. Dijkman,et al.  Similarity of business process models: Metrics and evaluation , 2011, Inf. Syst..

[14]  Darijus Strasunskas,et al.  Empirical Insights on a Value of Ontology Quality in Ontology-Driven Web Search , 2008, OTM Conferences.

[15]  Yugyung Lee,et al.  OntoKhoj: a semantic web portal for ontology searching, ranking and classification , 2003, WIDM '03.

[16]  Nicola Guarino,et al.  An Overview of OntoClean , 2004, Handbook on Ontologies.

[17]  Arne Sølvberg,et al.  Understanding quality in conceptual modeling , 1994, IEEE Software.

[18]  Carlo Batini,et al.  Data Quality: Concepts, Methodologies and Techniques , 2006, Data-Centric Systems and Applications.

[19]  Peter Rittgen,et al.  Business Process Model Similarity as a Proxy for Group Consensus , 2011, PoEM.

[20]  Balakrishnan Chandrasekaran,et al.  What are ontologies, and why do we need them? , 1999, IEEE Intell. Syst..

[21]  Jan Mendling,et al.  On the Translation between BPMN and BPEL , 2006, EMMSAD.

[22]  Dennis Tsichritzis,et al.  The ANSI/X3/SPARC DBMS Framework Report of the Study Group on Dabatase Management Systems , 1978, Inf. Syst..

[23]  Amit P. Sheth,et al.  OntoQA: Metric-Based Ontology Quality Analysis , 2005 .

[24]  Graeme G. Shanks,et al.  A semiotic information quality framework: development and comparative analysis , 2005, J. Inf. Technol..

[25]  Jan Mendling,et al.  What Makes Process Models Understandable? , 2007, BPM.

[26]  Chris Gane,et al.  Structured Systems Analysis: Tools and Techniques , 1977 .

[27]  John Krogstie,et al.  A Structured Evaluation to Assess the Reusability of Models of User Profiles , 2010, BMMDS/EMMSAD.

[28]  Daniel L. Moody,et al.  The “Physics” of Notations: Toward a Scientific Basis for Constructing Visual Notations in Software Engineering , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering.

[29]  Aldo Gangemi,et al.  Modelling Ontology Evaluation and Validation , 2006, ESWC.

[30]  Csaba Veres,et al.  Ontology Alignment Quality: A Framework and Tool for Validation , 2011, Int. J. Inf. Syst. Model. Des..

[31]  John R. Josephson,et al.  What Are They? Why Do We Need Them? , 1999 .

[32]  Klaus Pohl,et al.  The three dimensions of requirements engineering: a framework and its applications , 1994, Inf. Syst..

[33]  Ekkart Kindler,et al.  On the semantics of EPCs: Resolving the vicious circle , 2006, Data Knowl. Eng..

[34]  Asunción Gómez-Pérez,et al.  ONTOMETRIC: A Method to Choose the Appropriate Ontology , 2004, J. Database Manag..

[35]  Daniel L. Moody,et al.  The method evaluation model: a theoretical model for validating information systems design methods , 2003, ECIS.

[36]  Steffen Staab,et al.  International Handbooks on Information Systems , 2013 .

[37]  Jan Mendling,et al.  Seven process modeling guidelines (7PMG) , 2010, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[38]  Peter Spyns,et al.  Lexically Evaluating Ontology Triples Generated Automatically from Texts , 2005, ESWC.

[39]  Harith Alani,et al.  Ranking Ontologies with AKTiveRank , 2006, SEMWEB.

[40]  Yair Wand,et al.  Choosing classes in conceptual modeling , 1997, CACM.

[41]  Vijayan Sugumaran,et al.  A semiotic metrics suite for assessing the quality of ontologies , 2005, Data Knowl. Eng..

[42]  Graeme G. Shanks,et al.  What Makes a Good Data Model? Evaluating the Quality of Entity Relationship Models , 1994, ER.

[43]  Jacques Bertin,et al.  Semiology of Graphics - Diagrams, Networks, Maps , 2010 .

[44]  Ramkrishnan V. Tenkasi,et al.  P ERSPECTIVE M AKING AND P ERSPECTIVE T AKING IN C OMMUNITIES OF K NOWING , 2000 .

[45]  Sara Irina Fabrikant,et al.  Spatialization Methods: A Cartographic Research Agenda for Non-geographic Information Visualization , 2003 .

[46]  Alex Voss,et al.  Innovation in use: Interleaving day-to-day operation and systems development , 2000 .

[47]  Daniel L. Moody,et al.  Metrics for Evaluating the Quality of Entity Relationship Models , 1998, ER.

[48]  John Krogstie,et al.  Semantic Annotation of Process Models for Facilitating Process Knowledge Management , 2010, Int. J. Inf. Syst. Model. Des..

[49]  Vincenzo Gervasi,et al.  Achieving quality in natural language requirements , 1998 .

[50]  Graeme Shanks,et al.  A Semiotic Information Quality Framework , 2004 .

[51]  Yair Wand,et al.  Using objects for systems analysis , 1997, CACM.

[52]  Wil M. P. van der Aalst,et al.  Workflow Patterns , 2004, Distributed and Parallel Databases.

[53]  Steinar Carlsen,et al.  Organizational metaphors as lenses for analyzing workflow technology , 1997, GROUP.

[54]  Jan Mendling,et al.  Understanding the Occurrence of Errors in Process Models Based on Metrics , 2007, OTM Conferences.

[55]  A. Robinson.  Elements of Cartography , 1953 .