Effects of individuals' locus of control and computer self-efficacy on their e-learning acceptance in high-tech companies

High-tech companies encounter intense competition in today's global economy. With rapid changes in working environments, high-tech employees must learn quickly and effectively to solve difficult problems and increase their productivity. Many large high-tech companies have recently implemented electronic learning (e-learning) for employee training. However, e-learning systems are expensive and often underutilised. Therefore, understanding the factors associated with acceptance to e-learning are of priority concern. By integrating locus of control, computer self-efficacy and technology acceptance model (TAM) into one model, this study examines the feasibility of the extended TAM to explain employee acceptance of e-learning systems. Data were collected from 223 employees at five high-tech companies located in the Hsinchu Science Park, Taiwan. Analytical results indicate that locus of control had significant direct effects on perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use. Computer self-efficacy had significant direct effects on perceived ease of use and behavioural intention to use. Overall, analytical results provide strong support for using the extended TAM to explain user acceptance of e-learning systems. The research and practical implications of findings are discussed.

[1]  Yi-Chuan Hsieh,et al.  A model of organizational employees' e-learning systems acceptance , 2011, Knowl. Based Syst..

[2]  Diana Williams Sanders,et al.  Student Attitudes toward Web-Enhanced Instruction in an Introductory Biology Course , 2001 .

[3]  Mahwish Waheed.  Instructor’s Intention to Accept Online Education: An Extended TAM Model , 2010 .

[4]  R. E. Miles,et al.  Designing strategic human resources systems , 1984 .

[5]  Matthew K. O. Lee,et al.  Acceptance of Internet-based learning medium: the role of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation , 2005, Inf. Manag..

[6]  Su-Chao Chang,et al.  A new hybrid model for exploring the adoption of online nursing courses. , 2008, Nurse education today.

[7]  A. F. Adams,et al.  The Survey , 2021, Dyslexia in Higher Education.

[8]  J. Arbaugh.  Virtual Classroom Characteristics and Student Satisfaction with Internet-Based MBA Courses , 2000 .

[9]  Chin-Lung Hsu,et al.  Why do people play on-line games? An extended TAM with social influences and flow experience , 2004, Inf. Manag..

[10]  Terry Ryan,et al.  The Role of Social Presence and Moderating Role of Computer Self-Efficacy in Predicting the Continuance Usage of E-Learning Systems , 2004, J. Inf. Syst. Educ..

[11]  Shelley E. Taylor,et al.  Modeling cognitive adaptation: a longitudinal investigation of the impact of individual differences and coping on college adjustment and performance. , 1992, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[12]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[13]  Daniel Bar-Tal,et al.  The relationship between perception of locus of control and academic achievement , 1977 .

[14]  William R. King,et al.  A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model , 2006, Inf. Manag..

[15]  Deborah Compeau,et al.  Computer Self-Efficacy: Development of a Measure and Initial Test , 1995, MIS Q..

[16]  S. M. Arnsten.  Intrinsic motivation. , 1990, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[17]  Harris Cooper,et al.  Locus of control and academic achievement: A literature review. , 1983 .

[18]  R. Pugliese.  Telecourse persistence and psychological variables , 1994 .

[19]  M. Coovert,et al.  Locus of Control as a Predictor of Users' Attitude toward Computers , 1980 .

[20]  Marylène Gagné,et al.  Understanding e-learning continuance intention in the workplace: A self-determination theory perspective , 2008, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[21]  Ashok Jashapara,et al.  Understanding the complexity of human characteristics on e-learning systems: an integrated study of dynamic individual differences on user perceptions of ease of use , 2006 .

[22]  R. Hodson.  WORKING IN “HIGH-TECH”: RESEARCH ISSUES AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR THE INDUSTRIAL SOCIOLOGIST* , 1985 .

[23]  D. Schunk,et al.  Self-Efficacy and Academic Motivation , 1991 .

[24]  Ann E. Schlosser,et al.  Locus of Control, Web use, and Consumer Attitudes toward Internet Regulation , 2003 .

[25]  Lawrence M. Bellman,et al.  Using personality traits to predict communication technology use in the home , 1998 .

[26]  Marjan Hericko,et al.  A meta-analysis of e-learning technology acceptance: The role of user types and e-learning technology types , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[27]  Peng Xu,et al.  Do I have to learn something new? Mental models and the acceptance of replacement technologies , 2011, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[28]  Anastasios A. Economides,et al.  The acceptance and use of computer based assessment , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[29]  John Michael Pearson,et al.  Integrating website usability with the electronic commerce acceptance model , 2011, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[30]  Young-Gul Kim,et al.  Extending the TAM for a World-Wide-Web context , 2000, Inf. Manag..

[31]  C. Collins,et al.  STRATEGIC HUMAN RESOURCE PRACTICES, TOP MANAGEMENT TEAM SOCIAL NETWORKS, AND FIRM PERFORMANCE: THE ROLE OF HUMAN RESOURCE PRACTICES IN CREATING ORGANIZATIONAL COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE , 2003 .

[32]  Jeffrey H. Greenhaus,et al.  Causal Attributions, Expectations and Task Performance , 2011 .

[33]  Panayiotis E. Pintelas,et al.  A survey on student dropout rates and dropout causes concerning the students in the Course of Informatics of the Hellenic Open University , 2002, Comput. Educ..

[34]  Richard,et al.  Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation to Use Computers in the Workplace , 2022 .

[35]  B. Zimmerman,et al.  Self-Efficacy: An Essential Motive to Learn. , 2000, Contemporary educational psychology.

[36]  A Bandura,et al.  Cognitive processes mediating behavioral change. , 1977, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[37]  Christer Carlsson,et al.  Factors driving the adoption of m-learning: An empirical study , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[38]  Keenan A. Pituch,et al.  The influence of system characteristics on e-learning use , 2006, Comput. Educ..

[39]  WetzelsMartin,et al.  A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model , 2007 .

[40]  John P. Charlton,et al.  Measuring perceptual and motivational facets of computer control: the development and validation of the computing control scale , 2005, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[41]  Kan-Min Lin,et al.  e-Learning continuance intention: Moderating effects of user e-learning experience , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[42]  Chorng-Shyong Ong,et al.  Gender differences in perceptions and relationships among dominants of e-learning acceptance , 2006, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[43]  Richard D. Johnson,et al.  A theoretical model of differential social attributions toward computing technology: when the metaphor becomes the model , 2000, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[44]  F. Bookstein,et al.  Two Structural Equation Models: LISREL and PLS Applied to Consumer Exit-Voice Theory: , 1982 .

[45]  Judy Drennan,et al.  Factors Affecting Student Attitudes Toward Flexible Online Learning in Management Education , 2005 .

[46]  A. Parker.  A Study of Variables that Predict Dropout from Distance Education. , 1999 .

[47]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Model of the Antecedents of Perceived Ease of Use: Development and Test† , 1996 .

[48]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  On the evaluation of structural equation models , 1988 .

[49]  Mark J. Martinko,et al.  Identifying Leader Social Cognitions: Integrating the Causal Reasoning Perspective into Social Cognitive Theory , 2004 .

[50]  Jowati Juhary.  Understanding e-Learning , 2012 .

[51]  Yujong Hwang,et al.  Investigating enterprise systems adoption: uncertainty avoidance, intrinsic motivation, and the technology acceptance model , 2005, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[52]  Van Horn,et al.  Locus of control , 1973 .

[53]  Cuea.  Strategic human resource , 2016 .

[54]  J. Barling,et al.  Self-Efficacy Beliefs and Sales Performance , 1983 .

[55]  Yair Levy,et al.  Comparing dropouts and persistence in e-learning courses , 2007, Comput. Educ..

[56]  Paul E. Spector.  Behavior in organizations as a function of employee's locus of control. , 1982 .

[57]  Ming-Chi Lee,et al.  Explaining and predicting users' continuance intention toward e-learning: An extension of the expectation-confirmation model , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[58]  Chao-Min Chiu,et al.  Understanding e-learning continuance intention: An extension of the Technology Acceptance Model , 2006, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[59]  G. D. Wagner,et al.  A Quantitative Study of Factors Affecting Learner Acceptance of a Computer-Based Training Support Tool , 2004 .

[60]  A. Bandura.  Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory , 1985 .

[61]  Fethi Calisir,et al.  Factors affecting the intention to use a web-based learning system among blue-collar workers in the automotive industry , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[62]  T. C. Edwin Cheng,et al.  The role of perceived user-interface design in continued usage intention of self-paced e-learning tools , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[63]  Mark Srite,et al.  Individual differences and relative advantage: the case of GSS , 2002, Decis. Support Syst..

[64]  Szu-Yuan Sun,et al.  What influences college students to continue using business simulation games? The Taiwan experience , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[65]  Chorng-Shyong Ong,et al.  Factors affecting engineers' acceptance of asynchronous e-learning systems in high-tech companies , 2004, Inf. Manag..

[66]  Yan Xu,et al.  An Enhanced Technology Acceptance Model for Web-Based Learning , 2004, J. Inf. Syst. Educ..

[67]  Brian Dille,et al.  Identifying Predictors of High Risk among Community College Telecourse Students , 1991 .

[68]  Hal G. Gueutal,et al.  Technology, trainees, metacognitive activity and e‐learning effectiveness , 2009 .

[69]  Michael A. Kirkpatrick,et al.  Perceived Locus of Control and Academic Performance: Broadening the Construct's Applicability , 2008 .

[70]  R. Arteaga Sánchez,et al.  Motivational factors that influence the acceptance of Moodle using TAM , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[71]  J. Rotter.  Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. , 1966, Psychological monographs.

[72]  Jue Zhao,et al.  Extending TAM for online learning systems: An intrinsic motivation perspective , 2008 .

[73]  Ed Jones,et al.  Predicting performance in first-semester college basic writers: Revisiting the role of self-beliefs , 2008 .

[74]  E. C. Ritchie,et al.  Gender Differences , 1981, Language in Society.

[75]  Christian Terwiesch,et al.  An Exploratory Study of International Product Transfer and Production Ramp-Up in the Data Storage Industry , 1999 .

[76]  O. Kwon,et al.  User acceptance of context-aware services: self-efficacy, user innovativeness and perceived sensitivity on contextual pressure , 2007, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[77]  Richard P. Bagozzi,et al.  The Legacy of the Technology Acceptance Model and a Proposal for a Paradigm Shift , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[78]  Chun-Chieh Wang,et al.  An empirical study of instructor adoption of web-based learning systems , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[79]  Paul Jen-Hwa Hu,et al.  Examining technology acceptance by school teachers: a longitudinal study , 2003, Inf. Manag..

[80]  D DavisFred.  Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology , 1989 .

[81]  E. Skinner.  A guide to constructs of control. , 1996, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[82]  Melinda Korzaan,et al.  Individual characteristics and the intention to continue project escalation , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[83]  Gongming Qian,et al.  Profitability of small‐ and medium‐sized enterprises in high‐tech industries: the case of the biotechnology industry , 2003 .

[84]  Erik M. van Raaij,et al.  The acceptance and use of a virtual learning environment in China , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[85]  T. Ostrom,et al.  An Abbreviated Measure of Internal-External Locus of Control , 1974 .

[86]  Carolyn Strand Norman,et al.  Textbook websites: user technology acceptance behaviour , 2011, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[87]  Emad AbuShanab,et al.  Internet Banking and Customers' Acceptance in Jordan: The Unified Model's Perspective , 2010, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[88]  E. J. Phares.  Locus of control in personality , 1976 .

[89]  Eric W. T. Ngai,et al.  Empirical examination of the adoption of WebCT using TAM , 2007, Comput. Educ..

[90]  Xianggui Qu,et al.  Multivariate Data Analysis , 2007, Technometrics.

[91]  R. Zmud.  INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES AND MIS SUCCESS: A REVIEW OF THE EMPIRICAL LITERATURE* , 1979 .

[92]  Dothang Truong,et al.  Computer self-efficacy in an ongoing use context , 2004, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[93]  Sandra Streukens,et al.  The effect of service employees' technology readiness on technology acceptance , 2007, Inf. Manag..

[94]  Raafat George Saadé,et al.  The impact of cognitive absorption on perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use in on-line learning: an extension of the technology acceptance model , 2005, Inf. Manag..

[95]  Itzhak Harpaz,et al.  Differences in the meaning of work in Israel: Workers in high-tech versus traditional work industries , 2004 .

[96]  Martina Ziefle,et al.  On keys' meanings and modes: the impact of different key solutions on children's efficiency using a mobile phone , 2006, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[97]  Dongsong Zhang,et al.  Enhancing E-Learning with Interactive Multimedia , 2003, Inf. Resour. Manag. J..

[98]  P. Bobko,et al.  A Model for Predicting Computer Experience from Attitudes Toward Computers , 2001 .

[99]  Kieran Mathieson,et al.  Predicting User Intentions: Comparing the Technology Acceptance Model with the Theory of Planned Behavior , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[100]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation to Use Computers in the Workplace1 , 1992 .

[101]  Afzaal H. Seyal,et al.  A Study of Computer Attitudes of Non-Computing Students of Technical Colleges in Brunei Darussalam , 2002, J. Organ. End User Comput..

[102]  Jae-Shin Lee,et al.  Technology Acceptance and Social Networking in Distance Learning , 2003, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[103]  Yi-Shun Wang,et al.  The adoption of electronic tax filing systems: an empirical study , 2003, Gov. Inf. Q..

[104]  J. Rotter.  Internal versus external control of reinforcement: A case history of a variable. , 1990 .

[105]  James C. McElroy,et al.  Attitudinal and Behavioral Correlates of Computer Anxiety , 1986 .

[106]  Fotini Paraskeva,et al.  Exploring the personality characteristics in information and digital age expertise , 2010 .

[107]  Antonio Padilla-Meléndez,et al.  Factors affecting e-collaboration technology use among management students , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[108]  Jason Bennett Thatcher,et al.  An Empirical Examination of Individual Traits as Antecedents to Computer Anxiety and Computer Self-Efficacy , 2002, MIS Q..

[109]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Why Don't Men Ever Stop to Ask for Directions? Gender, Social Influence, and Their Role in Technology Acceptance and Usage Behavior , 2000, MIS Q..

[110]  L. James,et al.  CORRELATES OF PSYCHOLOGICAL INFLUENCE: AN ILLUSTRATION OF THE PSYCHOLOGICAL CLIMATE APPROACH TO WORK ENVIRONMENT PERCEPTIONS , 1979 .

[111]  John Ingham,et al.  Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model , 2003, Inf. Manag..

[112]  Hsiu-Ju Chen,et al.  Linking employees' e-learning system use to their overall job outcomes: An empirical study based on the IS success model , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[113]  Robin Kay,et al.  The Relation Between Locus of Control and Computer Literacy , 1990 .

[114]  Ya-Ching Lee,et al.  An empirical investigation into factors influencing the adoption of an e-learning system , 2006, Online Inf. Rev..