Bayesian Lg Attenuation Tomography Applied to Eastern Asia

Bayesian attenuation tomography (Tarantola, 1987) is being used to refine existing Lg attenuation models in eastern Asia. The advantages of a Bayesian approach to tomography are that large-scale and high-resolution tomographic models available from other well-accepted studies can be used as prior background models. The resulting refined tomographic model will blend into these prior background models. Moreover, the uncertainties are well established in a Bayesian framework. We assume a general linear Gaussian (least squares) model, where the covariance matrix is partitioned into data and prior model components. Uncertain data are naturally down weighted and model components with small errors will be subject to little change. Amplitude tomography provides only an approximation to the propagation effects a seismic wave may experience. For example, phase blockage can occur over relatively short distances in the absence of any anelastic effects. Station-centric kriged amplitude correction surfaces on top of the tomographic models may assist in identifying blocked paths. Because a signal-to-noise criterion is used to select amplitudes for the inversion, the data are left-censored and the resulting Q 0 models will be biased high. We examine the utility of a maximum-likelihood data augmentation method to the left-censored data problem (Schafer, 1997). In this case, we can only measure an upper bound to measured amplitudes on the basis of prephase noise. Data augmentation is used to impute the missing data values with their conditional expectation based on the relationship of amplitudes with other completely observed variables. We have initially chosen a bivariate Gaussian model for filling in missing amplitudes based on the relationship between amplitude and prephase noise. We apply the technique to eastern Asia for Lg signals at 1 Hz using data from 1651 earthquakes recorded at 12 stations. Tomographic patterns correlate well with those expected from geophysical considerations (e.g., high attenuation in Tibet and low attenuation up into the stable regions of Kazakhstan). Many of the large cratonic basins surrounding the Tibet Plateau (e.g., Tarim, Junggar) show reduced attenuation consistent with the hypothesis that they represent regions of stronger lithosphere. Data augmentation tends to increase attenuation in Tibet (particularly western Tibet) and the cratonic basins to the North of but not to the East of Tibet. In addition, the resulting models are much smoother than models that do not account for censoring.

[1]  T. J. Owens,et al.  Propagation characteristics of Lg across the Tibetan Plateau , 1996, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[2]  T. Lay,et al.  Characteristics of Lg attenuation in the Tibetan Plateau , 2002 .

[3]  W. Scott Phillips,et al.  Empirical path corrections for regional-phase amplitudes , 1999 .

[4]  Steven R. Taylor,et al.  Application of Regional Phase Amplitude Tomography to Seismic Verification , 2001 .

[5]  Paul G. Richards,et al.  Quantitative Seismology: Theory and Methods , 1980 .

[6]  Steven R. Taylor,et al.  1 Hz Lg Q tomography in central Asia , 2000 .

[7]  Regional CODA magnitudes in central Asia and MB (LG) transportability. , 2001 .

[8]  Steven R. Taylor,et al.  A procedure for estimation of source and propagation amplitude corrections for regional seismic discriminants , 1998 .

[9]  Joseph L Schafer,et al.  Analysis of Incomplete Multivariate Data , 1997 .

[10]  Robert H. Shumway,et al.  Iterative network magnitude estimation and uncertainty assessment with noisy and clipped data , 1989 .

[11]  T. Hearn,et al.  Regional wave propagation in China and its surrounding regions , 1997, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[12]  Brian J. Mitchell,et al.  Lg coda Q variation across Eurasia and its relation , 1997 .

[13]  Steven R. Taylor,et al.  Path correction using interpolated amplitude residuals: An example from central China , 1998 .

[14]  Howard J. Patton,et al.  Regional Magnitude Scaling, Transportability, and Ms:mb Discrimination at Small Magnitudes , 2001 .

[15]  Craig A. Schultz,et al.  A comparison of methodologies for representing path effects on regional P/S discriminants , 1999, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[16]  Thorne Lay,et al.  Why the Lg phase does not traverse oceanic crust , 1995 .

[17]  Douglas R. Baumgardt,et al.  Investigation of teleseismic Lg blockage and scattering using regional arrays , 1990 .

[18]  Robert B. Herrmann,et al.  Regionalization of crustal coda Q in the continental United States , 1983 .

[19]  Murray Aitkin,et al.  A Note on the Regression Analysis of Censored Data , 1981 .

[20]  D. Rubin,et al.  Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM - algorithm plus discussions on the paper , 1977 .

[21]  David M. Boore,et al.  Average body-wave radiation coefficients , 1984 .

[22]  E. S. Husebye,et al.  Application of arrays in the detection, location, and identification of seismic events , 1982 .

[23]  William Scott Phillips,et al.  A preliminary study of regional seismic discrimination in central Asia with emphasis on western China , 1996, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[24]  D. Seber,et al.  Tomographic Imaging of Lg and Sn Propagation in the Middle East , 2001 .

[25]  R. W. Ward,et al.  Three‐dimensional Q −1 model of the Coso Hot Springs Known Geothermal Resource Area , 1980 .

[26]  T. Hearn,et al.  Tomography and Location Problems in China Using Regional Travel-Time Data , 2001 .

[27]  H. C. Rodean,et al.  Magnitude corrections for attenuation in the upper mantle , 1979 .

[28]  Jiakang Xie,et al.  Lg Q in the Eastern Tibetan Plateau , 2002 .

[29]  Robert B. Herrmann,et al.  Spectral Characteristics of the Lg wave Generated by Central United States Earthquakes , 1975 .

[30]  Aaron A. Velasco,et al.  Amplitude Corrections for Regional Seismic Discriminants , 2002 .

[31]  W. Menke Geophysical data analysis , 1984 .

[32]  William R. Walter,et al.  A comparison of regional-phase amplitude ratio measurement techniques , 1997, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[33]  Ana F. Militino,et al.  Analyzing Censored Spatial Data , 1999 .

[34]  S. Solomon,et al.  Inversion Schemes for Surface Wave Attenuation and Q in the Crust and the Mantle , 1975 .

[35]  Christopher John Young,et al.  Nonstationary Bayesian kriging: A predictive technique to generate spatial corrections for seismic detection, location, and identification , 1998, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.