Sequential Adoption and Cost Savings from Precision Agriculture

Precision agricultural (PA) technologies can decrease input costs by providing farmers with more detailed information and application control, but adoption has been sluggish, especially for variable-rate technologies (VRT). Is it possible that farmers have difficulty realizing these cost savings? Combinations of PA technologies are considered as complements, testing several patterns of PA technology adoption that may show different levels of costs. The USDA’s Agricultural Resource Management Survey of corn producers is used to estimate a treatment-effects model that allows for selection bias. VRT contributes additional production cost savings when added to soil mapping, but not when done with yield mapping alone.

[1]  B. English,et al.  Corrigendum to “Adoption and Frequency of Precision Soil Testing in Cotton Production” , 2014 .

[2]  Marvin T. Batte,et al.  The economics of precision guidance with auto-boom control for farmer-owned agricultural sprayers , 2006 .

[3]  S. Fountas,et al.  Farmer Experience with Precision Agriculture in Denmark and the US Eastern Corn Belt , 2005, Precision Agriculture.

[4]  Jorge Fernandez-Cornejo,et al.  Farm-Level Effects of Adopting Herbicide-Tolerant Soybeans in the U.S.A. , 2002, Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics.

[5]  Howard D. Leathers,et al.  A Bayesian approach to explaining sequential adoption of components of a technological package , 1991 .

[6]  Brett Whelan,et al.  A preliminary approach to assessing the opportunity for site-specific crop management in a field, using yield monitor data , 2003 .

[7]  M. Khanna,et al.  Sequential Investment in Site-Specific Crop Management Under Output Price Uncertainty , 2001 .

[8]  M. C. Baddeley.  Uncertainty and investment , 2003 .

[9]  Peter R. Tozer,et al.  Uncertainty and investment in precision agriculture - Is it worth the money? , 2009 .

[10]  A. Magrì,et al.  Soil Test, Aerial Image and Yield Data as Inputs for Site-specific Fertility and Hybrid Management Under Maize , 2005, Precision Agriculture.

[11]  G. Bollero,et al.  The Value of Variable Rate Technology: An Information‐Theoretic Approach , 2009 .

[12]  Craig L. Dobbins,et al.  Spatial analysis of yield monitor data: case studies of on-farm trials and farm management decision making , 2008, Precision Agriculture.

[13]  Pilar Useche,et al.  Sequential Adoption of Package Technologies: The Dynamics of Stacked Trait Corn Adoption , 2011 .

[14]  D. Westfall,et al.  Evaluating Farmer Defined Management Zone Maps for Variable Rate Fertilizer Application , 2000, Precision Agriculture.

[15]  Derek Byerlee,et al.  Farmers' Stepwise Adoption of Technological Packages: Evidence from the Mexican Altiplano , 1986 .

[16]  Fábio Henrique Rojo Baio.  Evaluation of an auto-guidance system operating on a sugar cane harvester , 2011, Precision Agriculture.

[17]  R. G. V. Bramley,et al.  Adoption of variable rate fertiliser application in the Australian grains industry: status, issues and prospects , 2011, Precision Agriculture.

[18]  R. Llewellyn,et al.  Factors Influencing Adoption of Conservation Tillage in Australian Cropping Regions , 2008 .

[19]  Y. Miao,et al.  Spatial Variability of Soil Properties, Corn Quality and Yield in Two Illinois, USA Fields: Implications for Precision Corn Management , 2006, Precision Agriculture.

[20]  David Schimmelpfennig,et al.  On the Doorstep of the Information Age: Recent Adoption of Precision Agriculture , 2011 .

[21]  R. G. V. Bramley,et al.  Lessons from nearly 20 years of Precision Agriculture research, development, and adoption as a guide to its appropriate application , 2009 .

[22]  James A. Larson,et al.  The Variable-Rate Input Application Decision for Multiple Inputs with Interactions , 2006 .

[23]  John K. Horowitz,et al.  "No-Till" Farming Is a Growing Practice , 2012 .

[24]  W. H. Furtan,et al.  Factors That Affect the Adoption Decision of Conservation Tillage in the Prairie Region of Canada , 2008 .

[25]  Yeong Sheng Tey,et al.  Factors influencing the adoption of precision agricultural technologies: a review for policy implications , 2012, Precision Agriculture.