Web site accessibility of German and UK tourism information sites

Information exchange is important in any transaction but is perhaps particularly important for transactions in the travel and tourism industry where information gratification plays such a crucial role. Internet‐based technologies allow organisations to exchange information with an often geographically dispersed and wider marketplace without a loss of quality. However, merely being online, publishing a Web site is not enough. Organisations need to ensure their Web sites obtain “traffic” or “hits” and, importantly, that the content of their sites is accessible. Accessible Web sites mean access for all, accommodating different user capabilities and needs. This research examines the emerging competitive and legal imperatives to consider the issue of Web content accessibility as well as what makes for an accessible Web site. In spite of the strong competitive and legal imperatives for accessibility, a survey of 100 UK and German‐based travel and tourism Web sites conducted here revealed disappointingly low levels of accessibility. As the Internet and Web come to play a more important part in individual lives, this finding suggests that many organisations need to work harder to ensure that their often considerable investments achieve what they set out to do – communicate effectively with what they hope is a larger marketplace.

[1]  Jennifer Horwath Evaluating opportunities for expanded information access: a study of the accessibility of four online databases , 2002 .

[2]  J. J. Burnett,et al.  Assessing the Travel-Related Behaviors of the Mobility-Disabled Consumer , 2001 .

[3]  Christine E. Myhill ICT for access to information services for disabled people: an overview of projects and services at Gateshead Libraries Service , 2002 .

[4]  Axel Schmetzke,et al.  Accessibility of Web‐based information resources for people with disabilities , 2002 .

[5]  Marie Christine Roy,et al.  The impact of interface usability on trust in Web retailers , 2001, Internet Res..

[6]  Connie Van Fleet,et al.  Wired But Not Connected , 2000 .

[7]  Steven Furnell,et al.  Assessing the global accessibility of the Internet , 2002, Internet Res..

[8]  Linda Frederiksen,et al.  An accessibility assessment of selected Web‐based health information resources , 2002 .

[9]  Bryna Coonin,et al.  Establishing accessibility for e‐journals: a suggested approach , 2002 .

[10]  Lopo L. Rego,et al.  What makes commercial Web pages popular , 1998 .

[11]  Darlene Fichter Getting the job done: Designing accessible intranet sites , 2002 .

[12]  Rebecca Matson,et al.  Barriers to use: usability and content accessibility on the Web's most popular sites , 2000, CUU '00.

[13]  Randy Ryker,et al.  An examination of Web usage in a global context , 2001, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[14]  Brian Kelly Web Watch: An Accessibility Analysis of UK University Entry Points , 2002 .

[15]  Holly Yu,et al.  Web Accessibility and the Law: Recommendations for Implementation. , 2002 .

[16]  G. Vanderheiden Thirty-Something Million: Should They Be Exceptions? , 1990, Human factors.

[17]  Jo Ann Oravec Virtually Accessible: Empowering Students To Advocate for Accessibility and Support Universal Design. , 2002 .

[18]  Suzanne L. Byerley,et al.  Accessibility and usability of Web‐based library databases for non‐visual users , 2002 .

[19]  Axel Schmetzke,et al.  Web accessibility at university libraries and library schools , 2001 .

[20]  Russell Williams,et al.  An assessment of Web accessibility of UK accountancy firms , 2003 .

[21]  Kerri Odess-Harnish,et al.  Web site accessibility: a study of six genres , 2002 .