The MANTA vascular closure device in transfemoral TAVI: a real-world cohort
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] I. Elgendy,et al. Outcomes with plug‐based versus suture‐based vascular closure device after transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A systematic review and meta‐analysis , 2023, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.
[2] S. Iliceto,et al. Real-World Experience With a Large Bore Vascular Closure Device During TAVI Procedure: Features and Predictors of Access-Site Vascular Complications , 2022, Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine.
[3] H. Thiele,et al. Comparison of a Pure Plug-Based Versus a Primary Suture-Based Vascular Closure Device Strategy for Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: The CHOICE-CLOSURE Randomized Clinical Trial , 2021, Circulation.
[4] H. Thiele,et al. Manta versus Perclose ProGlide vascular closure device after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: Initial experience from a large European center. , 2021, Cardiovascular revascularization medicine : including molecular interventions.
[5] J. Leipsic,et al. Valve Academic Research Consortium 3: updated endpoint definitions for aortic valve clinical research. , 2021, European heart journal.
[6] P. D. de Jaegere,et al. Suture- or Plug-Based Large-Bore Arteriotomy Closure: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. , 2020, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.
[7] M. Lycke,et al. Assessment of the MANTA closure device in transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a single-centre observational study , 2020, Netherlands Heart Journal.
[8] R. Kobza,et al. Insights From a Multidisciplinary Introduction of the MANTA Vascular Closure Device. , 2019, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.
[9] M. Dake,et al. Pivotal Clinical Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of the MANTA Percutaneous Vascular Closure Device. , 2019, Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions.
[10] M. Laine,et al. Propensity-matched comparison of vascular closure devices after transcatheter aortic valve replacement using MANTA versus ProGlide. , 2019, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.
[11] A. Rück,et al. Impact of percutaneous femoral arteriotomy closure using the MANTATM device on vascular and bleeding complications after transcatheter aortic valve replacement , 2018, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.
[12] A. Opdahl,et al. Access site complications after transfemoral aortic valve implantation - a comparison of Manta and ProGlide , 2018, CVIR Endovascular.
[13] A. Colombo,et al. Percutaneous Plug-Based Arteriotomy Closure Device for Large-Bore Access: A Multicenter Prospective Study. , 2017, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.
[14] M. Lenzen,et al. MANTA, a novel plug-based vascular closure device for large bore arteriotomies: technical report. , 2016, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.
[15] J. Leipsic,et al. Management of vascular access in transcatheter aortic valve replacement: part 1: basic anatomy, imaging, sheaths, wires, and access routes. , 2013, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.
[16] P. Serruys,et al. Incidence, predictors, and implications of access site complications with transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation. , 2012, The American journal of cardiology.
[17] J. Bavaria,et al. Clinical ResearchInterventional CardiologyVascular Complications After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Insights From the PARTNER (Placement of AoRTic TraNscathetER Valve) Trial , 2012 .
[18] C. Meduri,et al. Percutaneous plug-based vascular closure device in 1000 consecutive transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantations. , 2022, International journal of cardiology.