The MANTA vascular closure device in transfemoral TAVI: a real-world cohort

Introduction and objectives: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is an established treatment option for patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis often performed via transfemoral access route (TF-TAVI). Therefore, successful closure of large-bore access sites is essential. This study aims to investigate the safety and effectiveness of the MANTA (Teleflex/Essential Medical, United States) vascular closure device (VCD) in patients undergoing TF-TAVI in an unselected and consecutive cohort of patients. Methods: We conducted a single-center, observational study of 245 consecutive patients undergoing TF-TAVI in whom the arterial large-bore femoral access was closed with a MANTA device from March 2020 through February 2022. The primary efficacy outcome measure was the rate of VCD failure according to the VARC-3 definition. Results: Successful closure of the large-bore access site occurred in 92.2% of the patients (n = 226). According to the VARC-3 definition, no major vascular or bleeding complications related to the plug-based VCD were reported. Patients with failed VCDs (7.8%) had significantly smaller minimal femoral artery diameters (6.6 ± 1.1 mm vs 7.6 ± 1.4 mm; P = .005) and consequently, significant higher sheath-to-femoral artery diameter ratios (0.78 ± 0.16 vs 0.69 ± 0.15; P = .019). No other inter-group differences were found. Conclusions: In this single-center, real-world, unselected large cohort of consecutive patients treated with TF-TAVI, a plug-based VCD for large-bore arteriotomy closure turned out effective and safe, and enabled arterial access-site management with a low rate of complications.

[1]  I. Elgendy,et al.  Outcomes with plug‐based versus suture‐based vascular closure device after transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A systematic review and meta‐analysis , 2023, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[2]  S. Iliceto,et al.  Real-World Experience With a Large Bore Vascular Closure Device During TAVI Procedure: Features and Predictors of Access-Site Vascular Complications , 2022, Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine.

[3]  H. Thiele,et al.  Comparison of a Pure Plug-Based Versus a Primary Suture-Based Vascular Closure Device Strategy for Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: The CHOICE-CLOSURE Randomized Clinical Trial , 2021, Circulation.

[4]  H. Thiele,et al.  Manta versus Perclose ProGlide vascular closure device after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: Initial experience from a large European center. , 2021, Cardiovascular revascularization medicine : including molecular interventions.

[5]  J. Leipsic,et al.  Valve Academic Research Consortium 3: updated endpoint definitions for aortic valve clinical research. , 2021, European heart journal.

[6]  P. D. de Jaegere,et al.  Suture- or Plug-Based Large-Bore Arteriotomy Closure: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. , 2020, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[7]  M. Lycke,et al.  Assessment of the MANTA closure device in transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a single-centre observational study , 2020, Netherlands Heart Journal.

[8]  R. Kobza,et al.  Insights From a Multidisciplinary Introduction of the MANTA Vascular Closure Device. , 2019, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[9]  M. Dake,et al.  Pivotal Clinical Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of the MANTA Percutaneous Vascular Closure Device. , 2019, Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions.

[10]  M. Laine,et al.  Propensity-matched comparison of vascular closure devices after transcatheter aortic valve replacement using MANTA versus ProGlide. , 2019, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[11]  A. Rück,et al.  Impact of percutaneous femoral arteriotomy closure using the MANTATM device on vascular and bleeding complications after transcatheter aortic valve replacement , 2018, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[12]  A. Opdahl,et al.  Access site complications after transfemoral aortic valve implantation - a comparison of Manta and ProGlide , 2018, CVIR Endovascular.

[13]  A. Colombo,et al.  Percutaneous Plug-Based Arteriotomy Closure Device for Large-Bore Access: A Multicenter Prospective Study. , 2017, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[14]  M. Lenzen,et al.  MANTA, a novel plug-based vascular closure device for large bore arteriotomies: technical report. , 2016, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[15]  J. Leipsic,et al.  Management of vascular access in transcatheter aortic valve replacement: part 1: basic anatomy, imaging, sheaths, wires, and access routes. , 2013, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[16]  P. Serruys,et al.  Incidence, predictors, and implications of access site complications with transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation. , 2012, American Journal of Cardiology.

[17]  J. Bavaria,et al.  Clinical ResearchInterventional CardiologyVascular Complications After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Insights From the PARTNER (Placement of AoRTic TraNscathetER Valve) Trial , 2012 .

[18]  C. Meduri,et al.  Percutaneous plug-based vascular closure device in 1000 consecutive transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantations. , 2022, International journal of cardiology.