Study of the IMRT interplay effect using a 4DCT Monte Carlo dose calculation

Respiratory motion may lead to dose errors when treating thoracic and abdominal tumours with radiotherapy. The interplay between complex multileaf collimator patterns and patient respiratory motion could result in unintuitive dose changes. We have developed a treatment reconstruction simulation computer code that accounts for interplay effects by combining multileaf collimator controller log files, respiratory trace log files, 4DCT images and a Monte Carlo dose calculator. Two three-dimensional (3D) IMRT step-and-shoot plans, a concave target and integrated boost were delivered to a 1D rigid motion phantom. Three sets of experiments were performed with 100%, 50% and 25% duty cycle gating. The log files were collected, and five simulation types were performed on each data set: continuous isocentre shift, discrete isocentre shift, 4DCT, 4DCT delivery average and 4DCT plan average. Analysis was performed using 3D gamma analysis with passing criteria of 2%, 2 mm. The simulation framework was able to demonstrate that a single fraction of the integrated boost plan was more sensitive to interplay effects than the concave target. Gating was shown to reduce the interplay effects. We have developed a 4DCT Monte Carlo simulation method that accounts for IMRT interplay effects with respiratory motion by utilizing delivery log files.

[1]  Joseph O Deasy,et al.  CERR: a computational environment for radiotherapy research. , 2003, Medical physics.

[2]  J. Dempsey,et al.  Evaluation of the gamma dose distribution comparison method. , 2003, Medical physics.

[3]  Steve B. Jiang,et al.  The management of respiratory motion in radiation oncology report of AAPM Task Group 76. , 2006, Medical physics.

[4]  Vladimir Pekar,et al.  Assessment of a model-based deformable image registration approach for radiation therapy planning. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[5]  Katja M Langen,et al.  Analyzing the impact of intrafraction motion: Correlation of different dose metrics with changes in target D95. , 2011, Medical physics.

[6]  George Starkschall,et al.  Verification of four-dimensional photon dose calculations. , 2009, Medical physics.

[7]  Steve B. Jiang,et al.  Measurement of the interplay effect in lung IMRT treatment using EDR2 films , 2006, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[8]  Eugene Wong,et al.  Experimental measurements and Monte Carlo simulations for dosimetric evaluations of intrafraction motion for gated and ungated intensity modulated arc therapy deliveries , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[9]  Eugene Wong,et al.  Commissioning a fast Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm for lung cancer treatment planning , 2008, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[10]  Steve B. Jiang,et al.  Effects of motion on the total dose distribution. , 2004, Seminars in radiation oncology.

[11]  E. Mok,et al.  Dose reconstruction for volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) using cone-beam CT and dynamic log files , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[12]  Paola Coan,et al.  X-ray phase-contrast imaging: from pre-clinical applications towards clinics , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[13]  D A Jaffray,et al.  The effects of intra-fraction organ motion on the delivery of dynamic intensity modulation. , 1998, Physics in medicine and biology.

[14]  W. Kwa,et al.  Monte Carlo based, patient-specific RapidArc QA using Linac log files. , 2009, Medical physics.

[15]  Chengyu Shi,et al.  Real time 4D IMRT treatment planning based on a dynamic virtual patient model: proof of concept. , 2011, Medical physics.

[16]  Eugene Wong,et al.  Monte Carlo dose calculation of segmental IMRT delivery to a moving phantom using dynamic MLC and gating log files. , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[17]  Indrin J Chetty,et al.  Synchronized dynamic dose reconstruction. , 2006, Medical physics.

[18]  Geoffrey G. Zhang,et al.  Four-dimensional dosimetry validation and study in lung radiotherapy using deformable image registration and Monte Carlo techniques , 2010, Radiation oncology.

[19]  Benjamin E Nelms,et al.  Per-beam, planar IMRT QA passing rates do not predict clinically relevant patient dose errors. , 2011, Medical physics.

[20]  Lei Xing,et al.  Dose verification for respiratory-gated volumetric modulated arc therapy. , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[21]  Jeffrey V Siebers,et al.  A computational method for estimating the dosimetric effect of intra-fraction motion on step-and-shoot IMRT and compensator plans. , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[22]  D. Low,et al.  A technique for the quantitative evaluation of dose distributions. , 1998, Medical physics.

[23]  E. Schreibmann,et al.  Patient-specific quality assurance method for VMAT treatment delivery. , 2009, Medical physics.

[24]  Toshikazu Imae,et al.  Quality assurance of volumetric modulated arc therapy using Elekta Synergy , 2009, Acta oncologica.

[25]  Ross Berbeco,et al.  Management of the interplay effect when using dynamic MLC sequences to treat moving targets. , 2008, Medical physics.

[26]  Steve B. Jiang,et al.  Effects of intra-fraction motion on IMRT dose delivery: statistical analysis and simulation. , 2002, Physics in medicine and biology.

[27]  Steve B. Jiang,et al.  Estimation of the delivered patient dose in lung IMRT treatment based on deformable registration of 4D-CT data and Monte Carlo simulations , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[28]  Jon J Kruse,et al.  On the insensitivity of single field planar dosimetry to IMRT inaccuracies. , 2010, Medical physics.

[29]  Wolfgang A Tomé,et al.  Lung 4D-IMRT treatment planning: an evaluation of three methods applied to four-dimensional data sets. , 2008, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.