Objective assessment of increase in breathing resistance of N95 respirators on human subjects.

Face masks or respirators are commonly worn by medical professionals and patients for protection against respiratory tract infection and the spread of illnesses, such as severe acute respiratory syndrome and pandemic influenza (H1N1). Breathing discomfort due to increased breathing resistance is known to be a problem with the use of N95 respirators but there is a lack of scientific data to quantify this effect. The purpose of this study was to assess objectively the impact of wearing N95 face masks on breathing resistance. A total of 14 normal adult volunteers (seven males and seven females) were recruited in this study. Nasal airflow resistance during inspiration and expiration was measured using a standard rhinomanometry and nasal spirometry. A modified full face mask was produced in-house in order to measure nasal resistance with the use of N95 (3M 8210) respirators. The results showed a mean increment of 126 and 122% in inspiratory and expiratory flow resistances, respectively, with the use of N95 respirators. There was also an average reduction of 37% in air exchange volume with the use of N95 respirators. This is the first reported study that demonstrates quantitatively and objectively the substantial impairment of nasal airflow in terms of increased breathing resistance with the use of N95 respirators on actual human subjects.

[1]  J. Peiris,et al.  Effectiveness of precautions against droplets and contact in prevention of nosocomial transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) , 2003, The Lancet.

[2]  Carolyn Farquharson,et al.  Responding to the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) outbreak: Lessons learned in a Toronto emergency department* , 2003, Journal of Emergency Nursing.

[3]  J. Vincent,et al.  Vancomycin Dosing in Critically Ill Patients Using Population Pharmacokinetics to Develop Personalised Dosing Regimens to Achieve Target Concentrations by Continuous Infusion , 2010 .

[4]  Mary-Louise McLaws,et al.  Protecting healthcare workers from pandemic influenza: N95 or surgical masks? , 2010, Critical care medicine.

[5]  Jeffrey B. Powell,et al.  Effect of exhaled moisture on breathing resistance of N95 filtering facepiece respirators. , 2010, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[6]  Lewis R Goldfrank,et al.  Novel H1N1 influenza and respiratory protection for health care workers. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  E. Newton,et al.  Effects of wearing N95 and surgical facemasks on heart rate, thermal stress and subjective sensations , 2005, International archives of occupational and environmental health.

[8]  Y Zhou,et al.  Face masks to prevent transmission of influenza virus: a systematic review , 2010, Epidemiology and Infection.

[9]  Clément Pa Committee report on standardization of rhinomanometry. , 1984 .

[10]  E. Wilder-Smith,et al.  Headaches and the N95 face‐mask amongst healthcare providers , 2006, Acta neurologica Scandinavica.

[11]  H Tokura,et al.  The effects of two kinds of mask (with or without exhaust valve) on clothing microclimates inside the mask in participants wearing protective clothing for spraying pesticides , 2004, International archives of occupational and environmental health.