Specific Neural Traces for Intonational Discourse Categories as Revealed by Human-evoked Potentials

The neural representation of segmental and tonal phonological distinctions has been shown by means of the MMN ERP, yet this is not the case for intonational discourse contrasts. In Catalan, a rising–falling intonational sequence can be perceived as a statement or as a counterexpectational question, depending exclusively on the size of the pitch range interval of the rising movement. We tested here, using the MMN, whether such categorical distinctions elicited distinct neurophysiological patterns of activity, supporting their specific neural representation. From a behavioral identification experiment, we set the boundary between the two categories and defined four stimuli across the continuum. Although the physical distance between each pair of stimuli was kept constant, the central pair represented an across-category contrast, whereas the other pairs represented within-category contrasts. These four auditory stimuli were contrasted by pairs in three different oddball blocks. The mean amplitude of the MMN was larger for the across-category contrast, suggesting that intonational contrasts in the target language can be encoded automatically in the auditory cortex. These results are in line with recent findings in other fields of linguistics, showing that, when a boundary between categories is crossed, the MMN response is not just larger but rather includes a separate subcomponent.

[1]  Friedemann Pulvermüller,et al.  Brain mechanisms linking language and action , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[2]  M. Dorman,et al.  Cortical auditory evoked potential correlates of categorical perception of voice-onset time. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  I. Nelken,et al.  Stimulus-Specific Adaptation in the Auditory Thalamus of the Anesthetized Rat , 2010, PloS one.

[4]  Jordi Costa-Faidella,et al.  Early change detection in humans as revealed by auditory brainstem and middle‐latency evoked potentials , 2010, The European journal of neuroscience.

[5]  L. Deouell The Frontal Generator of the Mismatch Negativity Revisited , 2007 .

[6]  M. Dorman,et al.  Neurophysiologic correlates of cross-language phonetic perception. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  Ping Li,et al.  Cortical Dynamics of Acoustic and Phonological Processing in Speech Perception , 2011, PloS one.

[8]  I. Nelken,et al.  Processing of low-probability sounds by cortical neurons , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[9]  J. Gandour,et al.  Speech Timing at the Sentence Level in Thai After Unilateral Brain Damage , 1994, Brain and Language.

[10]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Language-specific phoneme representations revealed by electric and magnetic brain responses , 1997, Nature.

[11]  S. Grimm,et al.  Auditory deviance detection revisited: evidence for a hierarchical novelty system. , 2012, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[12]  I. Winkler,et al.  Involuntary Attention and Distractibility as Evaluated with Event-Related Brain Potentials , 2000, Audiology and Neurotology.

[13]  Rajeev D. S. Raizada,et al.  Selective Amplification of Stimulus Differences during Categorical Processing of Speech , 2007, Neuron.

[14]  A. Krishnan,et al.  Relative influence of musical and linguistic experience on early cortical processing of pitch contours , 2009, Brain and Language.

[15]  K. Alho Cerebral Generators of Mismatch Negativity (MMN) and Its Magnetic Counterpart (MMNm) Elicited by Sound Changes , 1995, Ear and hearing.

[16]  R. Näätänen,et al.  Early selective-attention effects on the evoked potential: A critical review and reinterpretation , 1979, Biological Psychology.

[17]  Paul Boersma,et al.  Praat: doing phonetics by computer , 2003 .

[18]  F. Pulvermüller,et al.  Distributed neuronal networks for encoding category‐specific semantic information: the mismatch negativity to action words , 2004, The European journal of neuroscience.

[19]  A. Lahiri,et al.  Neurobiological Evidence for Abstract Phonological Representations in the Mental Lexicon during Speech Recognition , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[20]  F Pulvermüller,et al.  The sound of actions as reflected by mismatch negativity: rapid activation of cortical sensory–motor networks by sounds associated with finger and tongue movements , 2006, The European journal of neuroscience.

[21]  John J. Foxe,et al.  Mismatch Negativity to Tonal Contours Suggests Preattentive Perception of Prosodic Content , 2009, Brain Imaging and Behavior.

[22]  J. D. Miller,et al.  Speech perception by the chinchilla: voiced-voiceless distinction in alveolar plosive consonants , 1975, Science.

[23]  Lori L Holt,et al.  Auditory discontinuities interact with categorization: implications for speech perception. , 2004, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  D. Poeppel,et al.  Auditory Cortex Accesses Phonological Categories: An MEG Mismatch Study , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[25]  R. Näätänen The perception of speech sounds by the human brain as reflected by the mismatch negativity (MMN) and its magnetic equivalent (MMNm). , 2001, Psychophysiology.

[26]  Paul Boersma,et al.  Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer , 2002 .

[27]  M. Malmierca,et al.  Stimulus-Specific Adaptation in the Inferior Colliculus of the Anesthetized Rat , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[28]  H. Shu,et al.  Categorical perception of lexical tones in Chinese revealed by mismatch negativity , 2010, Neuroscience.

[29]  R Näätänen,et al.  Pre-attentive detection of vowel contrasts utilizes both phonetic and auditory memory representations. , 1999, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[30]  Pilar Prieto,et al.  When intonation plays the main character: information-vs. confirmation- seeking questions in Majorcan Catalan , 2010 .

[31]  Pilar Prieto,et al.  The role of pitch range in establishing intonational contrasts , 2014, Journal of the International Phonetic Association.

[32]  Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel,et al.  Question/statement judgments: An fMRI study of intonation processing , 2004, Human brain mapping.

[33]  P. Hagoort,et al.  Lateralization of tonal and intonational pitch processing: An MEG study , 2010, Brain Research.

[34]  Bharath Chandrasekaran,et al.  Mismatch negativity to pitch contours is influenced by language experience , 2007, Brain Research.

[35]  M. Malmierca,et al.  Novelty detector neurons in the mammalian auditory midbrain , 2005, The European journal of neuroscience.

[36]  G. Ren,et al.  Early cortical processing of linguistic pitch patterns as revealed by the mismatch negativity , 2009, Neuroscience.

[37]  G. Dehaene-Lambertz Electrophysiological correlates of categorical phoneme perception in adults , 1997, Neuroreport.

[38]  R. Näätänen,et al.  The mismatch negativity (MMN) in basic research of central auditory processing: A review , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[39]  Jordi Costa-Faidella,et al.  Electrophysiological evidence for the hierarchical organization of auditory change detection in the human brain. , 2011, Psychophysiology.

[40]  J D Miller,et al.  Speech perception by the chinchilla: identification function for synthetic VOT stimuli. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[41]  F. Pulvermüller,et al.  Language outside the focus of attention: The mismatch negativity as a tool for studying higher cognitive processes , 2006, Progress in Neurobiology.

[42]  B. Milner,et al.  A Cross-Linguistic PET Study of Tone Perception in Mandarin Chinese and English Speakers , 2001, NeuroImage.

[43]  David J. Freedman,et al.  Categorical representation of visual stimuli in the primate prefrontal cortex. , 2001, Science.

[44]  E Uusipaikka,et al.  Perceptual magnet effect in the light of behavioral and psychophysiological data. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[45]  Martine Grice,et al.  THE ROLE OF PITCH RANGE IN REALISING PRAGMATIC CONTRASTS - THE CASE OF TWO QUESTION TYPES IN ITALIAN , 2007 .