Digital storage of echocardiograms offers superior image quality to analog storage, even with 20:1 digital compression: results of the Digital Echo Record Access Study.

A large interobserver and intraobserver variability study was performed comparing both digitally compressed and uncompressed echocardiographic images with the same images recorded onto super-VHS video-cassette tape (the current standard). In a blinded, randomized fashion, 179 observers scored the diagnostic and image quality of 20 pairs of echocardiographic loops representing various pathologic conditions. Overall, the digital images were preferred to the S-VHS images both for image quality and diagnostic content (p < 0.0001) regardless of the background or experience level of the observer. Furthermore, uncompressed digital images and those compressed by the Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG) algorithm at ratios of 20:1 were judged equivalent. These findings show that digital compression may be used routinely in echocardiography, resulting in improved image and diagnostic quality over present standards.

[1]  M. Goldberg,et al.  Application of wavelet compression to digitized radiographs. , 1994, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[2]  J D Thomas,et al.  Digital compression of echocardiograms: impact on quantitative interpretation of color Doppler velocity. , 1996, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[3]  J D Thomas,et al.  The DICOM Image Formatting Standard: what it means for echocardiographers. , 1995, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[4]  H Feigenbaum,et al.  Digital recording, display, and storage of echocardiograms. , 1988, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[5]  Gregory K. Wallace,et al.  JPEG still picture compression algorithm , 1991 .

[6]  Stéphane Mallat,et al.  A Theory for Multiresolution Signal Decomposition: The Wavelet Representation , 1989, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[7]  J D Thomas,et al.  Digital formatting standards in medical imaging: a primer for echocardiographers. , 1994, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[8]  J D Thomas,et al.  JPEG compression of digital echocardiographic images: impact on image quality. , 1995, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[9]  H Feigenbaum,et al.  Digital echocardiography in myocardial infarction. , 1992, Australian and New Zealand journal of medicine.

[10]  Joan L. Mitchell,et al.  JPEG: Still Image Data Compression Standard , 1992 .

[11]  R A Olshen,et al.  Thoracic CT images: effect of lossy image compression on diagnostic accuracy. , 1994, Radiology.

[12]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[13]  P. W. Jones,et al.  Digital Image Compression Techniques , 1991 .

[14]  Glenn L. Cash,et al.  On Implementing The Jpeg Still-Picture Compression Algorithm , 1989, Other Conferences.

[15]  F P Ottes Methodology for the evaluation of diagnostic image quality. , 1992, International journal of bio-medical computing.

[16]  M S Rebelo,et al.  Lossy compression in nuclear medicine images. , 1993, Proceedings. Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care.

[17]  Stéphane Mallat,et al.  Multifrequency channel decompositions of images and wavelet models , 1989, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..