Teams are the primary unit of working in the construction industry, and thus the performance of an industry can be improved when team performance is improved. Therefore, managers in the field should be well aware of good team-working practices for successful forming and managing of teams within construction industry and many authors in the field have pointed out this as a necessity. Team composition is a key factor in influencing team performance; when considering the team composition, it is relevant to take into account the different roles which the members play and the way they interact with one another. Team roles of the members can be used as a tool for the team to have effective execution of their work, effective management of their relationships with its environment and also to maintain the team's strength in meeting social needs of individuals who form the team. The design team being a major and most prominent sub-team will have an impact on project success; the applicability of team role concept in construction design teams will be beneficial to its clients, project managers, team members and, finally, for the project and construction industry as a whole. According to Belbin's team role theory, when a team is more balanced in terms of the spread of naturally occurring team roles, it tends to be high performing. This study explored the existence of team roles and their effect to team performance in construction design teams. To explore this research problem, three case studies of in-house design teams which were involved in building construction projects with separated procurement arrangement were conducted in Sri Lanka. Team roles of the design team members were assessed using the Belbin Team Role Self Perception Inventory, while semi-structured interviews were conducted with the key design team members as well as team selectors. The findings revealed that individuals are assigned to design teams considering their functional roles rather than team roles. But, team members naturally adopted team roles in a way that it suits their functional role, project requirements and team setting under which they operate, in most of the situations. Team performance was affected by several complex factors. Hence, even though there seems to be an effect from team role balance to team performance, it could not be isolated and figured out. Despite this limitation, this study offers implications particularly to design team selectors such as clients and their project managers on application of team role theory in construction context.
[1]
Barbara Senior.
Team roles and team performance: Is there ‘really’ a link?
,
1997
.
[2]
John F Woodward,et al.
Construction Project Teams Making Them Work Profitably
,
2001
.
[3]
H L Michael,et al.
MANAGEMENT OF RESEARCH. INTRODUCTION
,
1973
.
[4]
Kees Ahaus,et al.
Team roles, team balance and performance
,
2008
.
[5]
David Arditi,et al.
FACTORS THAT AFFECT PROCESS QUALITY IN THE LIFE CYCLE OF BUILDING PROJECTS
,
1998
.
[6]
Albert P.C. Chan,et al.
Factors affecting the quality of building projects in Hong Kong
,
2000
.
[7]
James Sommerville,et al.
Project teambuilding—the applicability of Belbin's team-role self-perception inventory
,
1998
.
[8]
J. Kidd.
Management Teams: Why They Succeed or Fail
,
1982
.
[9]
Eric Chong.
Role balance and team development: A study of team role characteristics underlying high and low performing teams
,
2007
.
[10]
R. Yin.
Case Study Research: Design and Methods
,
1984
.
[11]
Sepani Senaratne,et al.
Construction Project Teams and their Development: Case Studies in Sri Lanka
,
2009
.
[12]
Murray R. Barrick,et al.
Team Structure and Performance: Assessing the Mediating Role of Intrateam Process and the Moderating Role of Task Type
,
2000
.
[13]
Şule Taşlı Pektaş,et al.
Modelling detailed information flows in building design with the parameter-based design structure matrix
,
2006
.
[14]
Claretha Jennings,et al.
Team building: a 3‐dimensional teamwork model
,
2006
.
[15]
Mazhil Rajendran,et al.
Analysis of team effectiveness in software development teams working on hardware and software environments using Belbin Self‐perception Inventory
,
2005
.
[16]
Zachary A. Wong.
Human Factors in Project Management: Concepts, Tools, and Techniques for Inspiring Teamwork and Motivation
,
2007
.
[17]
D. Partington,et al.
Team role balance and team performance: an empirical study
,
1999
.
[18]
Christopher Gorse,et al.
The practice of construction management : people and business performance
,
2004
.
[19]
Tim Cornick,et al.
Construction Project Teams: Making them Work Profitably
,
1999
.
[20]
Greg L. Stewart,et al.
AN EXPLORATION OF MEMBER ROLES AS A MULTILEVEL LINKING MECHANISM FOR INDIVIDUAL TRAITS AND TEAM OUTCOMES
,
2005
.
[21]
M. Easterby-Smith,et al.
Management Research: An Introduction
,
1991
.