Digital Inequality

This article expands understanding of the digital divide to more nuanced measures of use by examining differences in young adults’ online activities. Young adults are the most highly connected age group, but that does not mean that their Internet uses are homogenous. Analyzing data about the Web uses of 270 adults from across the United States, the article explores the differences in 18- to 26-year-olds’ online activities and what social factors explain the variation. Findings suggest that those with higher levels of education and of a more resource-rich background use the Web for more “capitalenhancing” activities. Detailed analyses of user attributes also reveal that online skill is an important mediating factor in the types of activities people pursue online. The authors discuss the implications of these findings for a “second-level digital divide,” that is, differences among the population of young adult Internet users.

[1]  Keith N. Hampton,et al.  Capitalizing on the Net: Social Contact, Civic Engagement, and Sense of Community , 2008 .

[2]  Sonia Livingstone,et al.  Gradations in digital inclusion: children, young people and the digital divide , 2007, New Media Soc..

[3]  Karine Barzilai-Nahon,et al.  Gaps and Bits: Conceptualizing Measurements for Digital Divide/s , 2006 .

[4]  U. Foehr.  MEDIA MULTITASKING AMONG AMERICAN YOUTH: PREVALENCE, PREDICTORS AND PAIRINGS , 2006 .

[5]  J. Cooper,et al.  The digital divide: the special case of gender , 2006, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[6]  Sara Hassani.  Locating digital divides at home, work, and everywhere else , 2006 .

[7]  S. Rivas,et al.  Cognitive ability and Internet use among older adults , 2006 .

[8]  E. Hargittai,et al.  Differences in Actual and Perceived Online Skills: The Role of Gender* , 2006 .

[9]  Ronald E. Rice,et al.  Influences, usage, and outcomes of Internet health information searching: Multivariate results from the Pew surveys , 2006, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[10]  Karine Nahon,et al.  Gaps and Bits: Conceptualizing Measurements for Digital Divide/s , 2006, Inf. Soc..

[11]  J. V. Dijk.  The Network Society: Social Aspects of New Media , 2005 .

[12]  Eszter Hargittai,et al.  Survey Measures of Web-Oriented Digital Literacy , 2005 .

[13]  I. Wasserman,et al.  Gender and the Internet: Causes of Variation in Access, Level, and Scope of Use , 2005 .

[14]  Paul DiMaggio,et al.  Digital Inequality: From Unequal Access to Differentiated Use , 2004 .

[15]  S. Cotten,et al.  Characteristics of online and offline health information seekers and factors that discriminate between them. , 2004, Social science & medicine.

[16]  S. Livingstone,et al.  UK children go online: surveying the experiences of young people and their parents , 2004 .

[17]  Ulla K. Bunz,et al.  The Computer-Email-Web (CEW) Fluency Scale--Development and Validation , 2001 .

[18]  Wallace Koehler,et al.  Virtual inequality: Beyond the digital divide , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[19]  Laura Dianne Stanley,et al.  Beyond Access: Psychosocial Barriers to Computer Literacy Special Issue: ICTs and Community Networking , 2003, Inf. Soc..

[20]  Frank Parry,et al.  Social Consequences of Internet Use: Access, Involvement, and Interaction , 2003 .

[21]  Sonia Livingstone,et al.  Children's Use of the Internet: Reflections on the Emerging Research Agenda , 2003, New Media Soc..

[22]  H. Ono,et al.  Gender and the Internet , 2003 .

[23]  Eszter Hargittai,et al.  Informed Web Surfing: The Social Context of User Sophistication , 2003 .

[24]  J. Cooper.  Gender and computers , 2003 .

[25]  C. Crook,et al.  Children's Computer Use at Home and at School: Context and continuity , 2002 .

[26]  Eszter Hargittai,et al.  Second-Level Digital Divide: Differences in People's Online Skills , 2002, First Monday.

[27]  Lee Rainie,et al.  Getting Serious Online. , 2002 .

[28]  H. Bonfadelli.  The Internet and Knowledge Gaps , 2002 .

[29]  A. Nation.  Online: How Americans Are Expanding Their Use of the Internet , 2002 .

[30]  Wilson Lowrey,et al.  The Impact of Technological Skill on Job-Finding Success in the Mass Communication Labor Market , 2001 .

[31]  P. Howard,et al.  Days and Nights on the Internet , 2001 .

[32]  David Tewksbury,et al.  Accidentally Informed: Incidental News Exposure on the World Wide Web , 2001 .

[33]  Benjamin M. Compaine,et al.  Unexpected Outcomes in Digital Divide Policy: What Children Really Do in the Public Library , 2001 .

[34]  Sonia Livingstone,et al.  Children On-line: Emerging Uses of the Internet at Home † , 2001 .

[35]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Troubles With the Internet: The Dynamics of Help at Home , 2000, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[36]  Paul Attewell,et al.  Home Computers and School Performance , 1999, Inf. Soc..

[37]  John Russial,et al.  Digital Imaging Skills and the Hiring and Training of Photojournalists , 1998 .

[38]  Frances Grundy.  Gender and Computers , 1996, Intell. Tutoring Media.

[39]  William R. Elliott,et al.  Did the “Magic” Work? Knowledge of HIV/AIDS and the Knowledge Gap Hypothesis , 1995 .

[40]  J. Potter,et al.  Motivation and the Knowledge Gap , 1993 .

[41]  J. Kleinnijenhuis.  Newspaper Complexity and the Knowledge Gap , 1991 .

[42]  Robert J. Griffin,et al.  Energy in the Eighties: Education, Communication, and the Knowledge Gap , 1990 .

[43]  C. Gaziano,et al.  Neighborhood Newspapers, Citizen Groups and Public Affairs Knowledge Gaps , 1984 .

[44]  Lennart Brantgärde,et al.  THE INFORMATION GAP AND MUNICIPAL POLITICS IN SWEDEN , 1983 .

[45]  F. Kline,et al.  Deficits, Differences, and Ceilings , 1977 .

[46]  Thomas D. Cook,et al.  Sesame Street Revisited , 1975 .

[47]  P. J. Tichenor,et al.  MASS MEDIA FLOW AND DIFFERENTIAL GROWTH IN KNOWLEDGE , 1970 .