The use of O2 1.27 µm absorption band revisited for GHG monitoring from space and application to MicroCarb

Abstract. Monitoring CO2 from space is essential to characterize the spatio/temporal distribution of this major greenhouse gas, and quantify its sources and sinks. The mixing ratio of CO2 to dry air can be derived from the CO2/O2 column ratio. The O2 column is usually derived form its absorption signature on the solar reflected spectra over the O2 A-band (i.e. OCO-2, Tanso/Gosat, Tansat). As a result of atmospheric scattering, the atmospheric path length varies with the aerosols load, their vertical distribution, and their optical properties. The spectral distance between the O2 A-band (0.76 µm) and the CO2 absorption band (1.6 µm) results in significant uncertainties due to the varying spectral properties of the aerosols over the globe. There is another O2 absorption band at 1.27 µm with weaker lines than in the A-band. As the wavelength is much nearer to the CO2 and CH4 bands, there is less uncertainty when using it as a proxy of the atmospheric path length to the CO2 and CH4 bands. This O2 band is used by the TCCON network implemented for the validation of space-based GHG observations. However, this absorption band is contaminated by the spontaneous emission of the excited molecule O2*, which is produced by the photo-dissociation of O3 molecules in the stratosphere and mesosphere. From a satellite looking nadir, this emission has a similar shape as the absorption signal that is used. In the frame of the CNES MicroCarb project, scientific studies have been performed in 2016–2018 to explore the problems associated to this O2* airglow contamination and methods to correct it. A theoretical synthetic spectrum of the emission was derived from a new approach, based on A21 Einstein coefficients information contained in the line-by-line HITRAN 2016 data base. The shape of our synthetic spectrum is fully validated when compared to O2* airglow spectra observed by SCIAMACHY/ENVISAT in limb viewing. We have designed an inversion scheme of SCIAMACHY limb viewing spectra, allowing to determine the vertical distribution of the Volume Emision Rate of the O2* airglow. The VER profiles and corresponding integrated nadir intensities were both compared to a model of the emission based on the chemical-transport model REPROBUS. The airglow intensities depend mostly on the Solar Zenith Angle (both in model and data) and the model underestimate the observed emission by ∼ 15 %. This is fully confirmed with SCIAMACHY nadir viewing measurements over the oceans: in such conditions, we have disentangled and retrieved the nadir O2* emission in spite of the moderate spectral resolving power (∼ 860). It is shown that with the MicroCarb spectral resolution power (25,000) and SNR, the contribution of the O2* emission at 1.27 µm to the observed spectral radiance in nadir viewing may be disentangled from the lower atmosphere/ground absorption signature with a great accuracy. Simulations with 4ARCTIC radiative transfer inversion tool have shown that the CO2 mixing ratio may be retrieved with the accuracy required for quantifying the CO2 natural sources and sinks (pressure level error ≤ 1 hPa, XCO2 accuracy better than 0.4 ppmv) with only the O2 1.27 µm band. As a result of these studies (at an intermediate phase), it was decided to include this band (B4) in the MicroCarb design, while keeping the O2 A band for reference (B1). Our approach is very similar (likely identical), to the approach of Sun et al. (2018) who also analysed the potential of the O2 1.27 µm band and concluded favourably for GHG monitoring from space. We advocate for the inclusion of this O2 band on other GHG monitoring future space missions, such as GOSAT-3 and EU/ESA CO2-M missions, for a better GHG retrieval.

[1]  Anonymous,et al.  Comments to “Improved Retrievals of Carbon Dioxide from the Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 with the version 8 ACOS algorithm” , 2018 .

[2]  S. Wofsy,et al.  Reevaluating the Use of O2 a1Δg Band in Spaceborne Remote Sensing of Greenhouse Gases , 2018, Geophysical Research Letters.

[3]  Atul K. Jain,et al.  Global Carbon Budget 2018 , 2014, Earth System Science Data.

[4]  D. Marsh,et al.  Middle atmospheric ozone, nitrogen dioxide and nitrogen trioxide in 2002–2011: SD-WACCM simulations compared to GOMOS observations , 2017 .

[5]  J. Burrows,et al.  Retrieval of O 2 ( 1 Σ) and O 2 ( 1 Δ) volume emission rates in the mesosphere and lower thermosphere using SCIAMACHY MLT limb scans , 2017 .

[6]  A. Vandaele,et al.  Retrieval and validation of METOP/IASI methane , 2017 .

[7]  V. L. Orkin,et al.  Chemical Kinetics and Photochemical Data for Use in Atmospheric Studies: Evaluation Number 18 , 2015 .

[8]  T. Encrenaz,et al.  Search for horizontal and vertical variations of CO in the day and night side lower mesosphere of Venus from CSHELL/IRTF 4.53μm observations , 2015 .

[9]  Akihiko Kuze,et al.  Consistent satellite XCO 2 retrievals from SCIAMACHY and GOSAT using the BESD algorithm , 2015 .

[10]  Stanley P. Sander,et al.  NASA Data Evaluation: Chemical Kinetics and Photochemical Data for Use in Atmospheric Studies , 2014 .

[11]  Corinne Le Quéré,et al.  Carbon and Other Biogeochemical Cycles , 2014 .

[12]  Hartmut Boesch,et al.  Global Characterization of CO2 Column Retrievals from Shortwave-Infrared Satellite Observations of the Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 Mission , 2011, Remote. Sens..

[13]  F. Lefévre,et al.  First Detection of O2 Recombination Nightglow Emission at 1.27 µm in the Atmosphere of Mars With OMEGA/MEX and Comparison with Model , 2011 .

[14]  G. Barrot,et al.  Global ozone monitoring by occultation of stars: an overview of GOMOS measurements on ENVISAT , 2010 .

[15]  Tatsuya Yokota,et al.  Retrieval algorithm for CO 2 and CH 4 column abundances from short-wavelength infrared spectral observations by the Greenhouse gases observing satellite , 2010 .

[16]  G. Brasseur,et al.  Aeronomy of the Middle Atmosphere , 2009 .

[17]  Tatsuya Yokota,et al.  Global Concentrations of CO2 and CH4 Retrieved from GOSAT: First Preliminary Results , 2009 .

[18]  N. N. Shefov,et al.  Airglow as an Indicator of Upper Atmospheric Structure and Dynamics , 2008 .

[19]  Laurence S. Rothman,et al.  Einstein A-coefficients and statistical weights for molecular absorption transitions in the HITRAN database , 2006 .

[20]  Gang Li,et al.  The HITRAN 2008 molecular spectroscopic database , 2005 .

[21]  J. T. Wiensz Ozone retrievals from the oxygen infrared channels of the Osiris infrared imager , 2005 .

[22]  U. Grabowski,et al.  Evidence for CH4 7.6 μm non‐local thermodynamic equilibrium emission in the mesosphere , 2005 .

[23]  E. J. Llewellyn,et al.  The OSIRIS instrument on the Odin spacecraft , 2004 .

[24]  C. Sioris Impact of the dayglow and the Ring effect on the retrieval of surface pressure from the A and B bands of O2: application to Orbiting Carbon Observatory , 2003 .

[25]  Peter J. Rayner,et al.  Global observations of the carbon budget, 2, CO2 column from differential absorption of reflected sunlight in the 1.61 μm band of CO2 , 2002 .

[26]  G. Toon,et al.  Spaceborne measurements of atmospheric CO2 by high‐resolution NIR spectrometry of reflected sunlight: An introductory study , 2002 .

[27]  David A. Newnham,et al.  Integrated absorption intensity and Einstein coefficients for the O2 a1Δg-X3Σg- (0,0) transition: a comparison of cavity ringdown and high resolution Fourier transform spectroscopy with a long-path absorption cell , 1999 .

[28]  M. Buchwitz,et al.  SCIAMACHY: Mission Objectives and Measurement Modes , 1999 .

[29]  Sasha Madronich,et al.  The Role of Solar Radiation in Atmospheric Chemistry , 1999 .

[30]  Doran J. Baker,et al.  Decay of O2(a¹Δg) in the evening twilight airglow: Implications for the radiative lifetime , 1996 .

[31]  Martin G. Mlynczak,et al.  On the utility of the molecular oxygen dayglow emissions as proxies for middle atmospheric ozone , 1995 .

[32]  G. Brasseur,et al.  Chemistry of the 1991–1992 stratospheric winter: Three‐dimensional model simulations , 1994 .

[33]  M. Mlynczak,et al.  A detailed evaluation of the heating efficiency in the middle atmosphere , 1993 .

[34]  C. Zeippen,et al.  Excitation energies and oscillator strengths for the allowed transitions 2p4 3P to 2s2p5 3P0 and 2p4 1D, 1S to 2s2p5 1P0 in the O I isoelectronic sequence , 1988 .

[35]  H. Sekiguchi,et al.  Infrared Atmospheric Band Airglow Radiometer on Board the Satellite OHZORA , 1988 .

[36]  David W. Rusch,et al.  Solar Mesosphere Explorer Near-Infrared Spectrometer: Measurements of 1.27-μm radiances and the inference of mesospheric ozone , 1984 .

[37]  A. Chedin,et al.  A Fast Line-by-Line Method for Atmospheric Absorption Computations: The Automatized Atmospheric Absorption Atlas , 1981 .

[38]  W. Traub,et al.  Detection of O2 dayglow emission from Mars and the Martian ozone abundance , 1976 .

[39]  D. Baker,et al.  Twilight transition spectra of atmospheric O2 Ir emissions , 1975 .

[40]  D. Hunten,et al.  Altitude profile of the infrared atmospheric system of oxygen in the dayglow , 1968 .

[41]  A. V. Jones,et al.  Observation of the (0,0) Band of the (1Δg–3Σg−) System of Oxygen in the Day and Twilight Airglow , 1962, Nature.