Achieving Parity of the Sexes at the Undergraduate Level: A Study of Success

Most research about women in engineering focuses on reasons for their under-representation. In contrast, we capitalized on an opportunity to study success: the School of Industrial Engineering at the University of Oklahoma had organically achieved parity of the sexes at the undergraduate level. To investigate this success, we adopted an ethnographic perspective, interviewing 185 students who represented four fields and four institutions as well as 12 faculty in Industrial Engineering at the University of Oklahoma. These data pointed to a combination of aspects of the discipline and the department culture as explanatory variables. Emerging from the data was a third explanatory variable: a high number of students, disproportionately many women, who relocated into Industrial Engineering from another major, underscoring the impact of broad recruiting activities. This paper emphasizes ideas that other departments can consider adapting to their own efforts to increase diversity.

[1]  E. Seymour,et al.  Talking About Leaving: Why Undergraduates Leave The Sciences , 1997 .

[2]  Susan E. Walden,et al.  The Contribution Of Office Hours Type Interactions To Female Student Satisfaction With The Educational Experience In Engineering , 2005 .

[3]  John M. Braxton.  Reworking the Student Departure Puzzle , 2020 .

[4]  S.E. Walden,et al.  Industrial engineering student perceptions of computer science, computer engineering, and electrical engineering , 2005, Proceedings Frontiers in Education 35th Annual Conference.

[5]  Thomas D. Snyder,et al.  Digest of Education Statistics 2002 , 2001 .

[6]  Allan Fisher,et al.  Unlocking the Clubhouse : Women in Computing by Allan Fisher , 2015 .

[7]  FisherAllan,et al.  Unlocking the clubhouse , 2002 .

[8]  N. Lin.  Buidling a Network Theory of Social Capital , 1999, Connections.

[9]  Henry Etzkowitz,et al.  Athena Unbound: Acknowledgements , 2000 .

[10]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[11]  Teri Reed Rhoads,et al.  Gender Equity in Industrial Engineering: A Pilot Study , 2004 .

[12]  Thomas D. Snyder,et al.  Digest of Education Statistics , 1994 .

[13]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Athena Unbound: The Advancement of Women in Science and Technology , 2000 .

[14]  Barbara M. Moskal,et al.  Qualitative Methods Used in the Assessment of Engineering Education , 2004 .

[15]  Nan Lin,et al.  Social Capital: Theories of Capital , 2001 .

[16]  Sue V. Rosser,et al.  Re-engineering female friendly science , 1997 .

[18]  D.A. Trytten,et al.  A study of gender parity: department culture from the students' perspective , 2005, Proceedings Frontiers in Education 35th Annual Conference.

[19]  E. Schein.  Organizational Culture and Leadership , 1991 .

[20]  Susan E. Walden,et al.  Balancing on the Tightrope: Maintaining Gender Parity in a Successful Undergraduate Engineering Program , 2005 .

[21]  Teri Perl,et al.  Women in Science and Engineering: Choices for Success. Proceedings of a conference. New York City, New York, USA. March 12-13, 1998. , 2000, The Mathematical Gazette.

[22]  S. Schwartz,et al.  Leaving College: Rethinking the Causes and Cures of Student Attrition , 1987 .

[23]  Susan E. Walden,et al.  I Wish Someone Would’ve Told Me: Undergraduate Engineering Students Offer Advice To Incoming Students , 2006 .

[24]  G. Huang,et al.  Entry and Persistence of Women and Minorities in College Science and Engineering Education. , 2000 .

[25]  Henry Etzkowitz,et al.  Athena Unbound: The Advancement of Women in Science and Technology , 2000 .

[26]  Harvey S. Rosen,et al.  Following in Her Footsteps? Faculty Gender Composition and Women's Choices of College Majors , 1995 .

[27]  Teri J. Murphy,et al.  Industrial Engineering: Why Students Come And What Makes Them Stay? , 2005 .

[28]  Sandra L. Hanson.  Lost talent : women in the sciences , 1996 .

[29]  M. Thom,et al.  Balancing the Equation: Where are Women and Girls in Science, Engineering and Technology? , 2001 .