Information to share in supply chains dedicated to the mass production of customized products for decentralized management

In an upstream supply chain dedicated to the mass production of customized products, decentralized management can be an efficient and effective method in a steady state in which stochastic characteristics of customers' demands remain stable. However, this is possible only if all echelons that precede the final assembly line use periodic replenishment policies that restrain the stockout risk to a low predetermined probability. The safety stocks' levels are more difficult to define for alternative or optional parts, as well as the components they use, whose demands are weighted sums of random variables, affected by several random factors and organizational constraints. The factors and constraints to consider are not the same for supplied and produced components. The random demand of a component depends on the demand of alternative or optional parts mounted in the final product, through a double transformation involving the bill of materials explosion, which is at the origin of the weighted sum of random variables, and time lags. In the steady state, the knowledge of the probability distribution of that random variable allows for the determination of safety stocks that decouple the management of upstream supply chains. Progressive changes in the steady state require periodic and progressive adaptations of the safety stocks that do not directly depend on the final demand knowledge.

[1]  Jan Olhager,et al.  An integrated push-pull manufacturing strategy , 1990 .

[2]  A. Gunasekaran,et al.  Build‐to‐order supply chain management: a literature review and framework for development , 2005 .

[3]  Angappa Gunasekaran,et al.  Modeling and analysis of build-to-order supply chains , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[4]  Vincent Giard,et al.  Scheduling coordination in a supply chain using advance demand information , 2008 .

[5]  Hau L. Lee,et al.  Information distortion in a supply chain: the bullwhip effect , 1997 .

[6]  Vineet Padmanabhan,et al.  Comments on "Information Distortion in a Supply Chain: The Bullwhip Effect" , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[7]  Donald M. Anderson,et al.  Agile product development for mass customization , 1997 .

[8]  Marshall L. Fisher,et al.  Supply Chain Inventory Management and the Value of Shared Information , 2000 .

[9]  Eric Sucky,et al.  The bullwhip effect in supply chains—An overestimated problem? , 2009 .

[10]  Taylor Randall,et al.  In Search of the Bullwhip Effect , 2007, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[11]  A. Gunasekaran,et al.  Software Agents: Enabling Dynamic Supply Chain Management for a Build to Order Product Line , 2002, International Conference on Internet Computing.

[12]  J. Forrester Industrial Dynamics: A Major Breakthrough for Decision Makers , 2012 .

[13]  Armen Tumanyan,et al.  Problem taxonomy: a step towards effective information sharing in supply chain management , 2007 .

[14]  Dominique M. Hanssens,et al.  Order forecasts, retail sales, and the marketing mix for consumer durables , 1998 .

[15]  S. Ryu,et al.  A study on evaluation of demand information-sharing methods in supply chain , 2009 .

[16]  Wroe Alderson,et al.  Marketing efficiency and the principle of Postponement , 2006 .

[17]  Ilhyung Kim,et al.  Managing the order pipeline to reduce supply chain volatility , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[18]  Vineet Padmanabhan,et al.  Comments on "Information Distortion in a Supply Chain: The Bullwhip Effect" , 1997, Manag. Sci..

[19]  S. Disney,et al.  On bullwhip in supply chains--historical review, present practice and expected future impact , 2006 .

[20]  Yanfeng Ouyang,et al.  The bullwhip effect in supply chain networks , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[21]  Vincent Giard,et al.  The New Need for Safety Stocks in a Supply Chain Dedicated to Customized Mass Production , 2008 .