Remodeling of hippocampal synapses after hippocampus‐dependent associative learning

The aim of this study was to determine whether hippocampus‐dependent associative learning involves changes in the number and/or structure of hippocampal synapses. A behavioral paradigm of trace eyeblink conditioning was used. Young adult rabbits were given daily 80 trial sessions to a criterion of 80% conditioned responses in a session. During each trial, the conditioned (tone) and unconditioned (corneal airpuff) stimuli were presented with a stimulus‐free or trace interval of 500 msec. Control rabbits were pseudoconditioned by equal numbers of random presentations of the same stimuli. Brain tissue was taken for morphological analyses 24 hours after the last session. Synapses were examined in the stratum radiatum of hippocampal subfield CA1. Unbiased stereological methods were used to obtain estimates of the total number of synapses in this layer as well as the area of the postsynaptic density. The data showed that the total numbers of all synaptic contacts and various morphological subtypes of synapses did not change in conditioned animals. The area of the postsynaptic density, however, was significantly increased after conditioning in axospinous nonperforated synapses. This structural alteration may reflect an addition of signal transduction proteins (such as receptors and ion channels) and the transformation of postsynaptically silent synapses into functional ones. The findings of the present study indicate that cellular mechanisms of hippocampus‐dependent associative learning include the remodeling of existing hippocampal synapses. Further studies examining various time points along the learning curve are necessary to clarify the issue of whether these mechanisms also involve the formation of additional synaptic contacts. J. Comp. Neurol. 417:49–59, 2000. ©2000 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  Lucien T. Thompson,et al.  Trace Eyeblink Conditioning Increases CA1 Excitability in a Transient and Learning-Specific Manner , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[2]  E. Weibel Stereological Methods. Practical methods for biological morphometry , 1979 .

[3]  G. Clincke,et al.  Synaptic plasticity in rat hippocampus associated with learning , 1992, Behavioural Brain Research.

[4]  G Lynch,et al.  Brief bursts of high-frequency stimulation produce two types of structural change in rat hippocampus. , 1980, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  G. Horn,et al.  Changes in the structure of synapses associated with learning , 1985, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[6]  F. Morrell,et al.  Synapse restructuring associated with the maintenance phase of hippocampal long‐term potentiation , 1996, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[7]  Mary B. Kennedy,et al.  Signal transduction molecules at the glutamatergic postsynaptic membrane 1 Published on the World Wide Web on 24 October 1997. 1 , 1998, Brain Research Reviews.

[8]  K. Bedi,et al.  Estimation of the numerical density of synapses in rat neocortex. Comparison of the ‘disector’ with an ‘unfolding’ method , 1988, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[9]  S. Rose,et al.  Alterations in synaptic structure in the paleostriatal complex of the domestic chick,Gallus domesticus, following passive avoidance training , 1987, Brain Research.

[10]  E. Capaldi,et al.  The organization of behavior. , 1992, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[11]  H. Gundersen,et al.  Notes on the estimation of the numerical density of arbitrary profiles: the edge effect , 1977 .

[12]  Peter Somogyi,et al.  Cell Type and Pathway Dependence of Synaptic AMPA Receptor Number and Variability in the Hippocampus , 1998, Neuron.

[13]  M. Krug,et al.  Spinules in axospinous synapses of the rat dentate gyrus: changes in density following long-term potentiation , 1990, Brain Research.

[14]  Electron microscopic and morphometric studies on synaptic plasticity in the hippocampus of the rat following conditioning. , 1980, Journal fur Hirnforschung.

[15]  T M Mayhew,et al.  If you assume, you can make an ass out of u and me': a decade of the disector for stereological counting of particles in 3D space. , 1996, Journal of anatomy.

[16]  P. Andersen,et al.  Spatial training in a complex environment and isolation alter the spine distribution differently in rat CA1 pyramidal cells , 1997 .

[17]  Mark J. West,et al.  New stereological methods for counting neurons , 1993, Neurobiology of Aging.

[18]  D. C. Sterio The unbiased estimation of number and sizes of arbitrary particles using the disector , 1984, Journal of microscopy.

[19]  Didima M.D. De Groot,et al.  Comparison of methods for the estimation of the thickness of ultrathin tissue sections , 1988 .

[20]  J. Disterhoft,et al.  γisoform‐selective changes in PKC immunoreactivity after trace eyeblink conditioning in the rabbit hippocampus , 1997, Hippocampus.

[21]  W. Greenough,et al.  Transient and enduring morphological correlates of synaptic activity and efficacy change in the rat hippocampal slice , 1984, Brain Research.

[22]  G. Vrensen,et al.  Changes in size and shape of synaptic connections after visual training: An ultrastructural approach of synaptic plasticity , 1981, Brain Research.

[23]  J. Zimmer,et al.  Crossed pathways from the entorhinal area to the fascia dentata. I. Normal in rabbits , 1975, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[24]  J. Morrison,et al.  Synaptic coexistence of AMPA and NMDA receptors in the rat hippocampus: A postembedding immunogold study , 1998, Journal of neuroscience research.

[25]  J J Kim,et al.  Hippocampectomy impairs the memory of recently, but not remotely, acquired trace eyeblink conditioned responses. , 1995, Behavioral neuroscience.

[26]  R. Coggeshall,et al.  Methods for determining numbers of cells and synapses: A case for more uniform standards of review , 1996, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[27]  M. Hasselmo,et al.  The hippocampus as an associator of discontiguous events , 1998, Trends in Neurosciences.

[28]  E R Weibel,et al.  Recent stereological methods for cell biology: a brief survey. , 1990, The American journal of physiology.

[29]  F. Gaarskjaer Organization of the mossy fiber system of the rat studied in extended hippocampi. I. Terminal area related to number of granule and pyramidal cells , 1978, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[30]  J. Isaac,et al.  Evidence for silent synapses: Implications for the expression of LTP , 1995, Neuron.

[31]  J. Kleim,et al.  Synaptogenesis and FOS Expression in the Motor Cortex of the Adult Rat after Motor Skill Learning , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[32]  G Hung,et al.  Stereological methods. Vol. 1: Practical methods for biological morphometry By . Academic Press, New York/London, 1979. xvi + 415 pp., $57.50 , 1984 .

[33]  R. Malinow,et al.  Activation of postsynaptically silent synapses during pairing-induced LTP in CA1 region of hippocampal slice , 1995, Nature.

[34]  C. Regan,et al.  Ultrastructural analysis reveals avoidance conditioning to induce a transient increase in hippocampal dentate spine density in the 6hour post-training period of consolidation , 1998, Neuroscience.

[35]  Petter Laake,et al.  Different modes of expression of AMPA and NMDA receptors in hippocampal synapses , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[36]  T. Bliss,et al.  Ultrastructural synaptic correlates of spatial learning in rat hippocampus , 1997, Neuroscience.

[37]  T. Bliss,et al.  A synaptic model of memory: long-term potentiation in the hippocampus , 1993, Nature.

[38]  C. H. Bailey,et al.  The anatomy of a memory: convergence of results across a diversity of tests , 1988, Trends in Neurosciences.

[39]  H. J. G. Gundersen,et al.  Unbiased stereological estimation of the total number of synapses in a brain region , 1996, Journal of neurocytology.

[40]  Konrad Sandau,et al.  Unbiased Stereology. Three‐Dimensional Measurement in Microscopy. , 1999 .

[41]  E. Kandel,et al.  Structural changes accompanying memory storage. , 1993, Annual review of physiology.

[42]  R. F. Thompson,et al.  Hippocampus and trace conditioning of the rabbit's classically conditioned nictitating membrane response. , 1986, Behavioral neuroscience.

[43]  F. Morrell,et al.  Structural synaptic correlate of long‐term potentiation: Formation of axospinous synapses with multiple, completely partitioned transmission zones , 1993, Hippocampus.

[44]  Jean-Pierre Royet,et al.  Stereology: A method for analyzing images , 1991, Progress in Neurobiology.

[45]  F. Nottebohm,et al.  Synaptogenesis and changes in synaptic morphology related to acquisition of a new behavior , 1985, Brain Research.

[46]  D. Ballard,et al.  Learning-Dependent Synaptic Modifications in the Cerebellar Cortex of the Adult Rat Persist for at Least Four Weeks , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[47]  Mark J. West,et al.  Stereological methods for estimating the total number of neurons and synapses: issues of precision and bias , 1999, Trends in Neurosciences.

[48]  D. D. De Groot,et al.  Comparison of methods for the estimation of the thickness of ultrathin tissue sections. , 1988, Journal of microscopy.

[49]  D. Muller,et al.  Induction of long-term potentiation is associated with major ultrastructural changes of activated synapses. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[50]  W. Levy,et al.  Changes in the numerical density of synaptic contacts with long‐term potentiation in the hippocampal dentate gyrus , 1986, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[51]  J. Disterhoft,et al.  Hippocampectomy disrupts trace eye-blink conditioning in rabbits. , 1990, Behavioral neuroscience.

[52]  D. C. Howell Statistical Methods for Psychology , 1987 .

[53]  J. Konorski Conditioned reflexes and neuron organization. , 1948 .

[54]  P Andersen,et al.  An increase in dendritic spine density on hippocampal CA1 pyramidal cells following spatial learning in adult rats suggests the formation of new synapses. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[55]  A. Hjorth-Simonsen Distribution of commissural afferents to the hippocampus of the rabbit , 1977, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[56]  R. Weinberg,et al.  Enhanced expression of AMPA receptor protein at perforated axospinous synapses , 1998, Neuroreport.

[57]  E. Ziff Enlightening the Postsynaptic Density , 1997, Neuron.

[58]  D. Rusakov,et al.  Morphological changes associated with stages of memory formation in the chick following passive avoidance training , 1995, Behavioural Brain Research.

[59]  Santiago Ramón y Cajal,et al.  Neue Darstellung vom histologischen Bau des Centralnervensystems , 1894 .

[60]  J. Partridge,et al.  Selective acquisition of AMPA receptors over postnatal development suggests a molecular basis for silent synapses , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[61]  H. Gundersen Stereology of arbitrary particles * , 1986, Journal of microscopy.

[62]  Lucien T. Thompson,et al.  Enhanced synaptic transmission in CA1 hippocampus after eyeblink conditioning. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[63]  E. Weibel Practical methods for biological morphometry , 1979 .

[64]  W. Greenough,et al.  Learning causes synaptogenesis, whereas motor activity causes angiogenesis, in cerebellar cortex of adult rats. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.