Impact of hospital volume on operative mortality for major cancer surgery.

CONTEXT Hospitals that treat a relatively high volume of patients for selected surgical oncology procedures report lower surgical in-hospital mortality rates than hospitals with a low volume of the procedures, but the reports do not take into account length of stay or adjust for case mix. OBJECTIVE To determine whether hospital volume was inversely associated with 30-day operative mortality, after adjusting for case mix. DESIGN AND SETTING Retrospective cohort study using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare linked database in which the hypothesis was prospectively specified. Surgeons determined in advance the surgical oncology procedures for which the experience of treating a larger volume of patients was most likely to lead to the knowledge or technical expertise that might offset surgical fatalities. PATIENTS All 5013 patients in the SEER registry aged 65 years or older at cancer diagnosis who underwent pancreatectomy, esophagectomy, pneumonectomy, liver resection, or pelvic exenteration, using incident cancers of the pancreas, esophagus, lung, colon, and rectum, and various genitourinary cancers diagnosed between 1984 and 1993. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE Thirty-day mortality in relation to procedure volume, adjusted for comorbidity, patient age, and cancer stage. RESULTS Higher volume was linked with lower mortality for pancreatectomy (P=.004), esophagectomy (P<.001), liver resection (P=.04), and pelvic exenteration (P=.04), but not for pneumonectomy (P=.32). The most striking results were for esophagectomy, for which the operative mortality rose to 17.3% in low-volume hospitals, compared with 3.4% in high-volume hospitals, and for pancreatectomy, for which the corresponding rates were 12.9% vs 5.8%. Adjustments for case mix and other patient factors did not change the finding that low volume was strongly associated with excess mortality. CONCLUSIONS These data support the hypothesis that when complex surgical oncologic procedures are provided by surgical teams in hospitals with specialty expertise, mortality rates are lower.

[1]  S. Edge,et al.  Pancreas cancer resection outcome in American university centers in 1989–1990 , 1993, Cancer.

[2]  L. Way,et al.  An analysis of the reduced morbidity and mortality rates after pancreaticoduodenectomy. , 1989, Archives of surgery.

[3]  M. Schapira,et al.  Generalizability of the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results registry population: factors relevant to epidemiologic and health care research. , 1997, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[4]  A. Andrén-sandberg,et al.  Factors Influencing Survival After Total Pancreatectomy in Patients with Pancreatic Cancer , 1983, Annals of surgery.

[5]  J. Chmiel,et al.  National patterns of care for pancreatic cancer. Results of a survey by the Commission on Cancer. , 1996, Annals of surgery.

[6]  C. McArdle,et al.  Impact of variability among surgeons on postoperative morbidity and mortality and ultimate survival. , 1991, BMJ.

[7]  M. Lieberman,et al.  Relation of Perioperative Deaths to Hospital Volume Among Patients Undergoing Pancreatic Resection for Malignancy , 1993, Annals of surgery.

[8]  D. Mark,et al.  Patient and hospital characteristics related to in-hospital mortality after lung cancer resection. , 1992, Chest.

[9]  C. Gillis,et al.  Survival outcome of care by specialist surgeons in breast cancer: a study of 3786 patients in the west of Scotland , 1996, BMJ.

[10]  Nathan Mantel,et al.  Chi-square tests with one degree of freedom , 1963 .

[11]  H S Luft,et al.  Effects of Surgeon Volume and Hospital Volume on Quality of Care in Hospitals , 1987, Medical care.

[12]  A. Pollock,et al.  Breast cancer management: is volume related to quality? Clinical Advisory Panel. , 1997, British Journal of Cancer.

[13]  M. Brennan,et al.  Relation of perioperative deaths to hospital volume among patients undergoing pancreatic resection for malignancy. , 1993 .

[14]  L. Kessler,et al.  Potential for Cancer Related Health Services Research Using a Linked Medicare‐Tumor Registry Database , 1993, Medical care.

[15]  J. Tielsch,et al.  The Effects of Regionalization on Cost and Outcome for One General High‐Risk Surgical Procedure , 1995, Annals of surgery.

[16]  B. Sevin,et al.  National survey of ovarian carcinoma part V. The impact of physician's specialty on patients' survival , 1993, Cancer.

[17]  C. Round,et al.  Influence of clinician workload and patterns of treatment on survival from breast cancer , 1995, The Lancet.

[18]  R. Glasgow,et al.  Hospital volume influences outcome in patients undergoing pancreatic resection for cancer. , 1996, The Western journal of medicine.

[19]  J. Jollis,et al.  Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative data: differing perspectives. , 1993, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[20]  R E Hall,et al.  Searching for an improved clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative data. , 1996, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[21]  C. Mackenzie,et al.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. , 1987, Journal of chronic diseases.