A Multi-Scale Model for Contact Between Rough Surfaces

This work describes a non-statistical multi-scale model of the normal contact between rough surfaces. The model produces predictions for contact area as a function of contact load, and is compared to the traditional Greenwood and Williamson (GW) and Majumdar and Bhushan (MB) rough surface contact models, which represent single-scale statistical and fractal analyses, respectively. The current model incorporates the effect of asperity deformations at multiple scales into a simple framework for modeling the contact between nominally flat rough surfaces. Similar to the “protuberance upon protuberance” theory proposed by Archard, the model considers the effect of having smaller asperities located on top of larger asperities in repeated fashion with increasing detail down to the limits of current measurement techniques. The parameters describing the surface topography (areal asperity density and asperity radius) are calculated from an FFT performed of the surface profile. Thus, the model considers multi-scale effects, which fractal methods have addressed, while attempting to more accurately incorporate the deformation mechanics into the solution. After the FFT of a real surface is calculated, the computational resources needed for the method are very small. Perhaps surprisingly, the trends produced by this non-statistical multi-scale model are quite similar to those arising from the GW and MB models, but seem largely unaffected by the sampling resolution at the employed surface data.

[1]  M. Ashby,et al.  Strain gradient plasticity: Theory and experiment , 1994 .

[2]  R. Jackson,et al.  A comparison of contact modeling utilizing statistical and fractal approaches , 2006 .

[3]  Kyriakos Komvopoulos,et al.  Three-Dimensional Contact Analysis of Elastic-Plastic Layered Media With Fractal Surface Topographies , 2001 .

[4]  K. Komvopoulos,et al.  Analysis of the spherical indentation cycle for elastic-perfectly plastic solids , 2004 .

[5]  J. Greenwood,et al.  Contact of nominally flat surfaces , 1966, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[6]  Michele Ciavarella,et al.  Elastic contact stiffness and contact resistance for the Weierstrass profile , 2004 .

[7]  Dusan Krajcinovic,et al.  Fractal models of elastic-perfectly plastic contact of rough surfaces based on the Cantor set , 1995 .

[8]  Huajian Gao,et al.  Mechanism-based strain gradient plasticity— I. Theory , 1999 .

[9]  Leon M. Keer,et al.  Scale Effects of Elastic-Plastic Behavior of Microscopic Asperity Contacts , 1995 .

[10]  Norman A. Fleck,et al.  Frictionless indentation of dissimilar elastic-plastic spheres , 2000 .

[11]  B. Bhushan,et al.  Fractal Model of Elastic-Plastic Contact Between Rough Surfaces , 1991 .

[12]  Michele Ciavarella,et al.  Incipient sliding of rough surfaces in contact: a multiscale numerical analysis , 2001 .

[13]  Itzhak Green,et al.  A FINITE ELEMENT STUDY OF ELASTO-PLASTIC HEMISPHERICAL CONTACT , 2003 .

[14]  I. Green,et al.  A Finite Element Study of Elasto-Plastic Hemispherical Contact Against a Rigid Flat , 2005 .

[15]  B. Lincoln Elastic Deformation and the Laws of Friction , 1953, Nature.

[16]  Izhak Etsion,et al.  Analytical Approximations in Modeling Contacting Rough Surfaces , 1999 .

[17]  William S. Slaughter,et al.  Material-length-scale-controlled nanoindentation size effects due to strain-gradient plasticity , 2003 .

[18]  A. Majumdar,et al.  Fractal characterization and simulation of rough surfaces , 1990 .

[19]  Elasto-plastic hemispherical contact models for various mechanical properties , 2004 .

[20]  D. Bogy,et al.  An Elastic-Plastic Model for the Contact of Rough Surfaces , 1987 .

[21]  S. Timoshenko,et al.  Theory of elasticity , 1975 .

[22]  I. Gutiérrez,et al.  Correlation between nanoindentation and tensile properties influence of the indentation size effect , 2003 .

[23]  B. Persson,et al.  Elastic contact between randomly rough surfaces: Comparison of theory with numerical results , 2002 .

[24]  Alberto Carpinteri,et al.  Scaling phenomena due to fractal contact in concrete and rock fractures , 1999 .

[25]  K. Johnson,et al.  The contact of elastic regular wavy surfaces , 1985 .

[26]  G. Pharr,et al.  The correlation of the indentation size effect measured with indenters of various shapes , 2002 .

[27]  K. Komvopoulos,et al.  Contact analysis of elastic-plastic fractal surfaces , 1998 .

[28]  Huajian Gao,et al.  Mechanism-based strain gradient plasticity—II. Analysis , 2000 .

[29]  B. Bhushan,et al.  Role of Fractal Geometry in Roughness Characterization and Contact Mechanics of Surfaces , 1990 .

[30]  Yongwu Zhao,et al.  An Asperity Microcontact Model Incorporating the Transition From Elastic Deformation to Fully Plastic Flow , 2000 .

[31]  Yong Hoon Jang,et al.  Linear elastic contact of the Weierstrass profile† , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[32]  L. Kogut,et al.  Elastic-Plastic Contact Analysis of a Sphere and a Rigid Flat , 2002 .

[33]  B. Persson Elastoplastic contact between randomly rough surfaces. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[34]  John I. McCool,et al.  Comparison of models for the contact of rough surfaces , 1986 .

[35]  Kai Willner,et al.  Elasto-Plastic Normal Contact of Three-Dimensional Fractal Surfaces Using Halfspace Theory , 2004 .