Process dissociation, single-process theories, and recognition memory.

According to the assumptions of L. L. Jacoby's (1991) process dissociation method, performance in recognition memory is determined by the combination of an unconscious familiarity process and a conscious intentional recollection process. The process dissociation method is used to produce estimates of the contributions of the 2 components to recognition performance. This article investigates whether the method provides the correct estimates of components if performance actually depends on only a single process or on 2 processes different from those assumed by the method. The SAM model (G. Gillund & R. M. Shiffrin, 1984) was used to produce simulated data based on a single process. Variants of SAM with 2 processes and R. C. Atkinson and J. F. Juola's (1973) 2-process model were used to produce data based on 2 processes.

[1]  L. Jacoby,et al.  Dissociations of processes in recognition memory: effects of interference and of response speed. , 1994, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[2]  R Ratcliff,et al.  Empirical generality of data from recognition memory receiver-operating characteristic functions and implications for the global memory models. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[3]  A. Yonelinas Receiver-operating characteristics in recognition memory: evidence for a dual-process model. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[4]  G. Mandler Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence. , 1980 .

[5]  E. Tulving,et al.  Memory Systems 1994 , 1994 .

[6]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Spreading activation versus compound cue accounts of priming: mediated priming revisited. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[7]  R. Nosofsky Exemplar-Based Accounts of Relations Between Classification, Recognition, and Typicality , 1988 .

[8]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  A retrieval theory of priming in memory. , 1988, Psychological review.

[9]  L. Jacoby,et al.  On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[10]  L. Jacoby,et al.  A Process-Dissociation Framework for Investigating Unconscious Influences: Freudian Slips, Projective Tests, Subliminal Perception, and Signal Detection Theory , 1992 .

[11]  S. Lewandowsky,et al.  Implicit Memory: Theoretical Issues , 1989 .

[12]  Andrew P. Yonelinas,et al.  Separating conscious and unconscious influences of memory: measuring recollection , 1993 .

[13]  David Allbritton,et al.  METAPHOR-BASED SCHEMAS AND TEXT REPRESENTATIONS : MAKING CONNECTIONS THROUGH CONCEPTUAL METAPHORS , 1995 .

[14]  R Ratcliff,et al.  Retrieving information from memory: spreading-activation theories versus compound-cue theories. , 1994, Psychological review.

[15]  M. Kendall,et al.  The advanced theory of statistics , 1945 .

[16]  L. Jacoby A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory , 1991 .

[17]  Daniel L. Schacter,et al.  What are the memory systems of 1994 , 1994 .

[18]  G. Mandler,et al.  Retrieval processes in recognition , 1974, Memory & cognition.

[19]  D. L. Hintzman Human learning and memory: connections and dissociations. , 1990, Annual review of psychology.

[20]  D L Hintzman,et al.  Violations of the independence assumption in process dissociation. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[21]  Robert A. Bjork,et al.  Measures of Memory , 1988 .

[22]  E Tulving,et al.  Priming and human memory systems. , 1990, Science.

[23]  E. Warrington,et al.  New Method of Testing Long-term Retention with Special Reference to Amnesic Patients , 1968, Nature.

[24]  B. Murdock A Theory for the Storage and Retrieval of Item and Associative Information. , 1982 .

[25]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Bias in the priming of object decisions. , 1995, Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory and Cognition.

[26]  L. Jacoby,et al.  Remembering without awareness , 1982 .

[27]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  A retrieval model for both recognition and recall. , 1984, Psychological review.

[28]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  List-strength effect: I. Data and discussion. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[29]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  Search of associative memory. , 1981 .

[30]  M. Glanzer,et al.  The regularities of recognition memory. , 1993, Psychological review.

[31]  L. Jacoby,et al.  Becoming famous without being recognized: Unconscious influences of memory produced by dividing attention , 1989 .

[32]  L. Squire Memory and the hippocampus: a synthesis from findings with rats, monkeys, and humans. , 1992, Psychological review.

[33]  R. L. Solso Theories in cognitive psychology : the Loyola symposium , 1975 .

[34]  Douglas L. Hintzman,et al.  Judgments of frequency and recognition memory in a multiple-trace memory model. , 1988 .

[35]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  List-strength Effect: Ii. Theoretical Mechanisms , 1990 .

[36]  B. Dosher,et al.  Integrated retrieval cues as a mechanism for priming in retrieval from memory , 1989 .

[37]  D. Meyer,et al.  Attention and Performance XIV , 1973 .

[38]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Testing global memory models using ROC curves. , 1992 .

[39]  D. Schacter,et al.  Intention, awareness, and implicit memory: The retrieval intentionality criterion , 1989 .

[40]  S. Monsell Recency, immediate recognition memory, and reaction time , 1978, Cognitive Psychology.

[41]  Philip M. Merikle,et al.  Independence or redundancy? Two models of conscious and unconscious influences , 1993 .

[42]  M Glanzer,et al.  The mirror effect in recognition memory: data and theory. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.