Accurate numerical methods for micromagnetics simulations with general geometries

In current FFT-based algorithms for micromagnetics simulations, the boundary is typically replaced by a staircase approximation along the grid lines, either eliminating the incomplete cells or replacing them by complete cells. Sometimes the magnetizations at the boundary cells are weighted by the volume of the sample in the corresponding cell. We show that this leads to large errors in the computed exchange and stray fields. One consequence of this is that the predicted switching mechanism depends sensitively on the orientation of the numerical grid. We present a boundary-corrected algorithm to efficiently and accurately handle the incomplete cells at the boundary. We show that this boundary-corrected algorithm greatly improves the accuracy in micromagnetics simulations. We demonstrate by using A. Arrott's example of a hexagonal element that the switching mechanism is predicted independently of the grid orientation.

[1]  R. LeVeque,et al.  A comparison of the extended finite element method with the immersed interface method for elliptic equations with discontinuous coefficients and singular sources , 2006 .

[2]  James P. Keener,et al.  Immersed Interface Methods for Neumann and Related Problems in Two and Three Dimensions , 2000, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[3]  S. W. Yuan,et al.  Fast adaptive algorithms for micromagnetics , 1992 .

[4]  Zhilin Li A Fast Iterative Algorithm for Elliptic Interface Problems , 1998 .

[5]  Thomas Schrefl,et al.  Nucleation fields of hard magnetic particles in 2D and 3D micromagnetic calculations , 1994 .

[6]  E Weinan,et al.  A Gauss-Seidel projection method for micromagnetics simulations , 2001 .

[7]  D. R. Fredkin,et al.  Finite element methods for micromagnetics , 1992 .

[8]  Jacob K. White,et al.  A precorrected-FFT method for electrostatic analysis of complicated 3-D structures , 1997, IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst..

[9]  S. Tsynkov Numerical solution of problems on unbounded domains. a review , 1998 .

[10]  J. L. Blue,et al.  Using multipoles decreases computation time for magnetostatic self-energy , 1991 .

[11]  A. J. Compton The Electromagnetic Field , 1986 .

[12]  W. Williams,et al.  A generalization of the demagnetizing tensor for nonuniform magnetization , 1993 .

[13]  A. Hubert,et al.  Solving Micromagnetic Problems. Towards an Optimal Numerical Method , 1993 .

[14]  J. Daughton Magnetoresistive memory technology , 1992 .

[15]  A. Stroud,et al.  Gaussian quadrature formulas , 1966 .

[16]  Lev Davidovich Landau,et al.  ON THE THEORY OF THE DISPERSION OF MAGNETIC PERMEABILITY IN FERROMAGNETIC BODIES , 1935 .

[17]  Nobuo Hayashi,et al.  Calculation of Demagnetizing Field Distribution Based on Fast Fourier Transform of Convolution , 1996 .

[18]  Hongwei Cheng,et al.  Nonlinear Optimization, Quadrature, and Interpolation , 1999, SIAM J. Optim..

[19]  John Strain,et al.  Locally Corrected Multidimensional Quadrature Rules for Singular Functions , 1995, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[20]  Amikam Aharoni,et al.  Demagnetizing factors for rectangular ferromagnetic prisms , 1998 .