Exposure Effects in Design Idea Generation: Unconscious Conformity or a Product of Sampling Probability?

The process of idea generation in engineering design is sensitive to many internal and external factors. External representations, such as previous designs, are often issued to designers to strive creativity and productivity through cognitive stimulation. However, past research has shown that examples may cause a negative effect known as design fixation, which limits the diversity of idea production. In this paper, we highlight two opposing explanations for why examples limit the diversity of idea generation, which are that designers unconsciously conform to examples or that examples exhaust the pool of possible solutions before the search has begun. We provide a critical review of theory and empirical research on effects of examples, and present a study that combines several methods of behavioural analysis to illustrate the effect of examples in the idea generation process of sixteen senior students of mechanical engineering. The discussion reflects the findings of the study to the existing body of evidence concerning exposure effects in design idea generation.

[1]  R. Adamson,et al.  Functional fixedness as related to elapsed time and to set. , 1954, Journal of experimental psychology.

[2]  R. Marsh,et al.  Conceptual priming in a generative problem-solving task , 1999, Memory & cognition.

[3]  Gabriela Goldschmidt,et al.  Expertise and the use of visual analogy: implications for design education , 1999 .

[4]  Claudia Eckert,et al.  Sources of inspiration: a language of design , 2000 .

[5]  N. Maier Reasoning in humans. II. The solution of a problem and its appearance in consciousness. , 1931 .

[6]  J. Landau,et al.  Source monitoring in a generative task , 2002, Memory.

[7]  S. Mednick The associative basis of the creative process. , 1962, Psychological review.

[8]  John S. Gero,et al.  Fixation Effects: Do They Exist in Design Problem Solving? , 1993 .

[9]  N. Bonnardel,et al.  Evocation Processes by Novice and Expert Designers: Towards Stimulating Analogical Thinking , 2004 .

[10]  Steven M. Smith,et al.  Metrics for measuring ideation effectiveness , 2003 .

[11]  Alan S. Brown,et al.  Cryptomnesia: Delineating inadvertent plagiarism. , 1989 .

[12]  M. Diehl,et al.  Idea Production in Nominal and Virtual Groups: Does Computer-Mediated Communication Improve Group Brainstorming? , 2000 .

[13]  Ronald A. Finke,et al.  Imagery, Creativity, and Emergent Structure , 1996, Consciousness and Cognition.

[14]  R. Mayer The search for insight: Grappling with gestalt psychology''s unanswered questions , 1995 .

[15]  Bryan Lawson,et al.  How Designers Think , 1980 .

[16]  Allen Newell,et al.  Human Problem Solving. , 1973 .

[17]  John S. Gero,et al.  Effects of examples on the results of a design activity , 1992, Knowl. Based Syst..

[18]  Steven M. Smith,et al.  Constraining effects of examples in a creative generation task , 1993, Memory & cognition.

[19]  Paul A Howard-Jones,et al.  Ideational Productivity, Focus of Attention, and Context , 2003 .

[20]  John S. Gero,et al.  Design and other types of fixation , 1996 .

[21]  B. Nijstad,et al.  Cognitive stimulation and interference in groups: Exposure effects in an idea generation task , 2002 .

[22]  Lassi A. Liikkanen,et al.  CONTEXTUAL CUEING AND VERBAL STIMULI IN DESIGN IDEA GENERATION , 2006 .

[23]  R. Weisberg,et al.  Following the wrong footsteps: fixation effects of pictorial examples in a design problem-solving task. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[24]  K. Dugosh,et al.  Cognitive stimulation in brainstorming. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[25]  Steven M. Smith,et al.  Getting into and out of mental ruts: A theory of fixation, incubation, and insight. , 1995 .

[26]  A. Luchins,et al.  Rigidity of behavior : a variational approach to the effect of Einstellung , 1961 .

[27]  Matti Perttula,et al.  The idea exposure paradigm in design idea generation , 2007 .

[28]  Thomas B. Ward,et al.  What''s old about new ideas , 1995 .

[29]  Terence Connolly,et al.  On the Effectiveness of Group Brainstorming , 1993 .

[30]  Vincent R. Brown,et al.  Modeling Cognitive Interactions During Group Brainstorming , 1998 .

[31]  K. Dugosh,et al.  Cognitive and social comparison processes in brainstorming , 2005 .

[32]  Paul B. Paulus,et al.  Group Preference and Convergent Tendencies in Small Groups: A Content Analysis of Group Brainstorming Performance , 1999 .

[33]  Jason L. Hicks,et al.  Contributions of inadequate source monitoring to unconscious plagiarism during idea generation , 1997 .

[34]  K. Duncker,et al.  On problem-solving , 1945 .

[35]  R. Marsh,et al.  How examples may (and may not) constrain creativity , 1996, Memory & cognition.

[36]  T. B. Ward Structured Imagination: the Role of Category Structure in Exemplar Generation , 1994, Cognitive Psychology.

[37]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Verbal reports as data. , 1980 .

[38]  A. Luchins Mechanization in problem solving: The effect of Einstellung. , 1942 .

[39]  Gary E. Raney,et al.  An eye movement study of insight problem solving , 2001, Memory & cognition.