AHP‐IFM Target: An Innovative Method to Define Reliability Target in an Aerospace Prototype Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process

Reliability target definition is a crucial aspect of any reliability analysis. In literature, there are two types of analysis. The first one, called ‘bottom-up’, goes back to the system's target using data of units through a fault tree analysis. Reliability data of components could be only partially available, particularly in the case of innovative systems. In the second type of analysis, called ‘top-down’, starting from similar systems, the target of each unit is defined, by applying allocation techniques. Also, in this case, reliability data of similar systems might not be available, and the choice of the most appropriate technique could be tricky. The purpose of the present research is to combine the advantages of both usual approaches. The newly developed approach is based on the integrated factors method, whose values are adjusted trough a multicriteria method, the analytic hierarchy process, depending on the importance of each factor and each unit. The innovation of the proposed model consists in its dynamism, as most of the literature methods use constant weights for the factors involved in reliability allocation. No method takes into account the assignment of a different level of significance (weight) to different units of the system, simultaneously with the considered factors. The developed approach has been applied on an aerospace prototype system. The results show the goodness of the new method and its ability to overcome the problems noted in literature. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  John Bowles,et al.  An assessment of RPN prioritization in a failure modes effects and criticality analysis , 2003, Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, 2003..

[2]  Fabio De Felice,et al.  VALIDATION AND APPLICATION OF A RELIABILITY ALLOCATION TECHNIQUE (ADVANCED INTEGRATED FACTORS METHOD) TO AN INDUSTRIAL SYSTEM , 2014 .

[3]  Ching-Hsue Cheng,et al.  Mcdm Aggregation Model Using Situational Me-OWA and Me-Owga Operators , 2006, Int. J. Uncertain. Fuzziness Knowl. Based Syst..

[4]  Om Prakash Yadav,et al.  Reliability demonstration test planning: A three dimensional consideration , 2006, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[5]  Robert Fullér,et al.  An Analytic Approach for Obtaining Maximal Entropy Owa Operator Weights , 2001, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[6]  M. Tucci,et al.  Accelerated life tests as an integrated methodology for product design, qualification and production control: a case study in household appliances , 2014 .

[7]  Ching-Hsue Cheng,et al.  Reliability assessment of an aircraft propulsion system using IFS and OWA tree , 2008 .

[8]  M. O'Hagan,et al.  Aggregating Template Or Rule Antecedents In Real-time Expert Systems With Fuzzy Set Logic , 1988, Twenty-Second Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers.

[9]  K. Smedley Reliability analysis for LEB ring magnet power system in SSC , 1991, Conference Record of the 1991 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference.

[10]  J. A. Boyd Allocation of reliability requirements: a new approach , 1992, Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium 1992 Proceedings.

[11]  Ronald R. Yager,et al.  On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decisionmaking , 1988, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[12]  Yung-Chia Chang,et al.  Innovative reliability allocation using the maximal entropy ordered weighted averaging method , 2009, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[13]  Ming Jian Zuo,et al.  A new reliability allocation weight for reducing the occurrence of severe failure effects , 2013, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[14]  Om Prakash Yadav,et al.  System reliability allocation methodology based on three-dimensional analyses , 2007 .

[15]  Yung-Chia Chang,et al.  ME-OWA based DEMATEL reliability apportionment method , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[16]  Om Prakash Yadav,et al.  A practical reliability allocation method considering modified criticality factors , 2014, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..