Modeling distributions of air pollutant concentrations—II. Estimation of one and two parameter statistical distributions

Abstract In Part I of this series Taylor, Jakeman and Simpson (1986, Atmospheric Environment , 20 , 1781–1789) examined the problem of identifying the appropriate distributional form for air pollution concentration data. In this paper we examine the parameter estimation problem. Monte Carlo simulation is used to compare methods for fitting statistical distributions to such data where the distributional form is known. Three methods are investigated for estimating the parameters of the lognormal distribution, two methods for the exponential distribution, three methods for the γ-distribution and four methods for the Weibull distribution. For all distributions and for each method we examine the accuracy with which the upper percentiles of the distribution are evaluated as it is these percentiles which are referred to by air quality standards. For each distribution a simple empirical model, which yields approximations to the relative root mean square error of the percentile estimates against sample size and parameter values, is developed and demonstrated. Thus for each distributional model an estimate of the relative error associated with evaluating high pollutant levels may be readily determined.

[1]  J H Seinfeld,et al.  On frequency distributions of air pollutant concentrations. , 1976, Atmospheric environment.

[2]  A. Jakeman,et al.  A hybrid model for predicting the distribution of pollutants dispersed from line sources. , 1985, The Science of the total environment.

[3]  C. Jordan,et al.  Calculus of Finite Differences. , 1963 .

[4]  Anthony J. Jakeman,et al.  Modeling distributions of air pollutant concentrations—I. Identification of statistical models , 1986 .

[5]  R. Larsen,et al.  A mathematical model for relating air quality measurements to air quality standards , 1971 .

[6]  M. V. Menon Estimation of the Shape and Scale Parameters of the Weibull Distribution , 1963 .

[7]  On generalized least squares estimation of the weibull distribution , 1982 .

[8]  S. C. Choi,et al.  Maximum Likelihood Estimation of the Parameters of the Gamma Distribution and Their Bias , 1969 .

[9]  W. E. Watt,et al.  Assessment of fitting techniques for the log Pearson type 3 distribution using Monte Carlo Simulation , 1979 .

[10]  Anthony J. Jakeman,et al.  An averaging time model of SO2 frequency distributions from a single point source , 1984 .

[11]  M. Kendall,et al.  The advanced theory of statistics , 1945 .

[12]  André Berger,et al.  Statistical Distributions of Daily and High Atmospheric So2-concentrations , 1982 .

[13]  A. Jakeman,et al.  Assessment of air-quality impacts from an elevated point source , 1985 .

[14]  Anthony Jakeman,et al.  A hybrid atdl-gamma distribution model for predicting area source acid gas concentrations , 1985 .

[15]  Wayne R. Ott,et al.  An evaluation of the methods of fractiles, moments and maximum likelihood for estimating parameters when sampling air quality data from a stationary lognormal distribution , 1984 .

[16]  W. D. Ray,et al.  Improved maximum likelihood estimators for the gamma distribution , 1975 .

[17]  B. Bobée,et al.  The Log Pearson type 3 distribution and its application in hydrology , 1975 .

[18]  L. R. Shenton,et al.  Further Remarks on Maximum Likelihood Estimators for the Gamma Distribution , 1972 .

[19]  The maximum likelihood estimators of the parameters of the gamma distribution are always positively biased , 1981 .

[20]  Jery R. Stedinger,et al.  Fitting log normal distributions to hydrologic data , 1980 .