Ultra-sensitive sequencing for cancer detection reveals progressive clonal selection in normal tissue over a century of human lifespan

High accuracy next-generation DNA sequencing promises a paradigm shift in early cancer detection by enabling the identification of mutant cancer molecules in minimally-invasive body fluid samples. We demonstrate 80% sensitivity for ovarian cancer detection using ultra-accurate Duplex Sequencing to identify TP53 mutations in uterine lavage. However, in addition to tumor DNA, we also detect low frequency TP53 mutations in nearly all lavages from women with and without cancer. These mutations increase with age and share the selection traits of clonal TP53 mutations commonly found in human tumors. We show that low frequency TP53 mutations exist in multiple healthy tissues, from newborn to centenarian, and progressively increase in abundance and pathogenicity with older age across tissue types. Our results illustrate that subclonal cancer evolutionary processes are a ubiquitous part of normal human aging and great care must be taken to distinguish tumor-derived, from age-associated mutations in high sensitivity clinical cancer diagnostics.

[1]  Peter J. Campbell,et al.  Somatic mutant clones colonize the human esophagus with age , 2018, Science.

[2]  M. Stratton,et al.  The landscape of somatic mutation in normal colorectal epithelial cells , 2018, Nature.

[3]  A. Jemal,et al.  Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries , 2018, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[4]  E. Obermayr,et al.  Uterine and Tubal Lavage for Earlier Cancer Detection Using an Innovative Catheter , 2018, International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.

[5]  K. Yoshihara,et al.  Clonal Expansion and Diversification of Cancer-Associated Mutations in Endometriosis and Normal Endometrium. , 2018, Cell reports.

[6]  Jean Louis Fournier,et al.  Seshat: A Web service for accurate annotation, validation, and analysis of TP53 variants generated by conventional and next‐generation sequencing , 2018, Human mutation.

[7]  G. Anderson,et al.  The Yet Unrealized Promise of Ovarian Cancer Screening. , 2018, JAMA oncology.

[8]  Jesse J. Salk,et al.  Enhancing the accuracy of next-generation sequencing for detecting rare and subclonal mutations , 2018, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[9]  Carol M. Mangione,et al.  Screening for Ovarian Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement , 2018, JAMA.

[10]  Scott R. Kennedy,et al.  Aging and the rise of somatic cancer-associated mutations in normal tissues , 2018, PLoS genetics.

[11]  Christian Gilissen,et al.  Ultra-sensitive Sequencing Identifies High Prevalence of Clonal Hematopoiesis-Associated Mutations throughout Adult Life. , 2017, American journal of human genetics.

[12]  L. Wood,et al.  Cancer‐Associated Mutations in Endometriosis without Cancer , 2017, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  Mark Lee,et al.  Next-Generation Sequencing of Circulating Tumor DNA for Early Cancer Detection , 2017, Cell.

[14]  B. Reva,et al.  Genomic Analysis of Uterine Lavage Fluid Detects Early Endometrial Cancers and Reveals a Prevalent Landscape of Driver Mutations in Women without Histopathologic Evidence of Cancer: A Prospective Cross-Sectional Study , 2016, PLoS medicine.

[15]  T. Druley,et al.  Clonal haematopoiesis harbouring AML-associated mutations is ubiquitous in healthy adults , 2016, Nature Communications.

[16]  Jillian T Henderson,et al.  Screening for Ovarian Cancer: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force , 2018, JAMA.

[17]  Scott R. Kennedy,et al.  Ultra-deep sequencing detects ovarian cancer cells in peritoneal fluid and reveals somatic TP53 mutations in noncancerous tissues , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  Klaus Pantel,et al.  Clinical Applications of Circulating Tumor Cells and Circulating Tumor DNA as Liquid Biopsy. , 2016, Cancer discovery.

[19]  E. Boerwinkle,et al.  dbNSFP v3.0: A One‐Stop Database of Functional Predictions and Annotations for Human Nonsynonymous and Splice‐Site SNVs , 2016, Human mutation.

[20]  I. Shih,et al.  Molecular Alterations of TP53 are a Defining Feature of Ovarian High-Grade Serous Carcinoma: A Rereview of Cases Lacking TP53 Mutations in The Cancer Genome Atlas Ovarian Study , 2016, International journal of gynecological pathology : official journal of the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists.

[21]  R. Dummer,et al.  The Genetic Evolution of Melanoma from Precursor Lesions. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[22]  K. Kinzler,et al.  Lavage of the Uterine Cavity for Molecular Detection of Müllerian Duct Carcinomas: A Proof-of-Concept Study , 2015, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[23]  M. Stratton,et al.  Clock-like mutational processes in human somatic cells , 2015, Nature Genetics.

[24]  V. Beral,et al.  Rethinking ovarian cancer II: reducing mortality from high-grade serous ovarian cancer , 2015, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[25]  M. Stratton,et al.  High burden and pervasive positive selection of somatic mutations in normal human skin , 2015, Science.

[26]  D. Bentley,et al.  TP53 mutations, tetraploidy and homologous recombination repair defects in early stage high-grade serous ovarian cancer , 2015, Nucleic acids research.

[27]  Lawrence D True,et al.  Sequencing small genomic targets with high efficiency and extreme accuracy , 2015, Nature Methods.

[28]  M. McCarthy,et al.  Age-related clonal hematopoiesis associated with adverse outcomes. , 2014, The New England journal of medicine.

[29]  S. Gabriel,et al.  Clonal hematopoiesis and blood-cancer risk inferred from blood DNA sequence. , 2014, The New England journal of medicine.

[30]  Joshua F. McMichael,et al.  Age-related cancer mutations associated with clonal hematopoietic expansion , 2014, Nature Medicine.

[31]  Brendan F. Kohrn,et al.  Detecting ultralow-frequency mutations by Duplex Sequencing , 2014, Nature Protocols.

[32]  T. Soussi,et al.  TP53 Mutations in Human Cancer: Database Reassessment and Prospects for the Next Decade , 2014, Human mutation.

[33]  L. Diaz,et al.  Liquid biopsies: genotyping circulating tumor DNA. , 2014, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[34]  K. Kinzler,et al.  Evaluation of DNA from the Papanicolaou Test to Detect Ovarian and Endometrial Cancers , 2013, Science Translational Medicine.

[35]  Jesse J. Salk,et al.  Detection of ultra-rare mutations by next-generation sequencing , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[36]  I. Shih,et al.  TP53 mutations in serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma and concurrent pelvic high‐grade serous carcinoma—evidence supporting the clonal relationship of the two lesions , 2012, The Journal of pathology.

[37]  Benjamin J. Raphael,et al.  Integrated Genomic Analyses of Ovarian Carcinoma , 2011, Nature.

[38]  S. Kato,et al.  Understanding the function–structure and function–mutation relationships of p53 tumor suppressor protein by high-resolution missense mutation analysis , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[39]  M. Nei,et al.  Simple methods for estimating the numbers of synonymous and nonsynonymous nucleotide substitutions. , 1986, Molecular biology and evolution.

[40]  J. Ptak,et al.  University of Southern Denmark Evaluation of liquid from the Papanicolaou test and other liquid biopsies for the detection of endometrial and ovarian cancers , 2018 .

[41]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer statistics, 2017 , 2017, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[42]  E. Diamandis,et al.  C O M M E N T a R Y Open Access , 2022 .

[43]  Thierry Soussi,et al.  TP53 mutations in human cancer: database reassessment and prospects for the next decade. , 2011, Advances in cancer research.