Disentangling nonlinear geomagnetic variability during magnetic storms and quiescence by timescale dependent recurrence properties

Understanding the complex behavior of the near-Earth electromagnetic environment is one of the main challenges of Space Weather studies. This includes both the correct characterization of the different physical mechanisms responsible for its configuration and dynamics as well as the efforts which are needed for a correct forecasting of several phenomena. By using a nonlinear multi-scale dynamical systems approach, we provide here new insights into the scale-to-scale dynamical behavior of both quiet and disturbed periods of geomagnetic activity. The results show that a scale-dependent dynamical transition occurs when moving from short to long timescales, i.e., from fast to slow dynamical processes, the latter being characterized by a more regular behavior, while more dynamical anomalies are found in the behavior of the fast component. This suggests that different physical processes are typical for both dynamical regimes: the fast component, being characterized by a more chaotic and less predictable behavior, can be related to the internal dynamical state of the near-Earth electromagnetic environment, while the slow component seems to be less chaotic and associated with the directly driven processes related to the interplanetary medium variability. Moreover, a clear difference has been found between quiet and disturbed periods, the former being more complex than the latter. These findings support the view that, for a correct forecasting in the framework of Space Weather studies, more attention needs to be devoted to the identification of proxies describing the internal dynamical state of the near-Earth electromagnetic environment.

[1]  G. Consolini,et al.  Multifractal structure of auroral electrojet index data. , 1996, Physical review letters.

[2]  S. M. Watson,et al.  Multifractal modeling of magnetic storms via symbolic dynamics analysis , 2005 .

[3]  Vincenzo Carbone,et al.  Timescale separation in the solar wind‐magnetosphere coupling during St. Patrick's Day storms in 2013 and 2015 , 2017 .

[4]  Byung-Ho Ahn,et al.  The Joule heat production rate and the particle energy injection rate as a function of the geomagnetic indices AE and AL , 1983 .

[5]  R. McPherron,et al.  Dependence of ring current asymmetry on storm phase , 2006 .

[6]  R. Donner,et al.  Areawise significance tests for windowed recurrence network analysis , 2019, Proceedings of the Royal Society A.

[7]  J. Wanliss,et al.  Fractal properties of SYM--H during quiet and active times , 2005 .

[8]  Enrico Camporeale,et al.  The Challenge of Machine Learning in Space Weather: Nowcasting and Forecasting , 2019, Space Weather.

[9]  Radial evolution of solar wind intermittency in the inner heliosphere , 2003, astro-ph/0303578.

[10]  I. Daglis,et al.  Energy density of ionospheric and solar wind origin ions in the near-Earth magnetotail during substorms , 1994 .

[11]  R. Donner,et al.  Recurrence‐Based Quantification of Dynamical Complexity in the Earth's Magnetosphere at Geospace Storm Timescales , 2018, Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics.

[12]  D. Baker,et al.  Energy Transfer between the Solar Wind and the Magnetosphere-Ionosphere System. , 1995 .

[13]  Konstantinos Papadopoulos,et al.  Low-dimensional chaos in magnetospheric activity from AE time series , 1990 .

[14]  Tuan D. Pham Recurrence Plots , 2020, Fuzzy Recurrence Plots and Networks with Applications in Biomedicine.

[15]  Y. Kamide the two-component auroral electrojet , 1982 .

[16]  Jonathan F. Donges,et al.  Complex Network Analysis of Recurrences , 2015 .

[17]  N. Huang,et al.  The empirical mode decomposition and the Hilbert spectrum for nonlinear and non-stationary time series analysis , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[18]  Scaling and singularity characteristics of solar wind and magnetospheric fluctuations , 2002, physics/0411055.

[19]  G. Consolini,et al.  On the Forecast Horizon of Magnetospheric Dynamics: A Scale‐to‐Scale Approach , 2018, Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics.

[20]  Jürgen Kurths,et al.  Quantifying entropy using recurrence matrix microstates. , 2018, Chaos.

[21]  Toshihiko Iyemori,et al.  Storm-Time Magnetospheric Currents Inferred from Mid-Latitude Geomagnetic Field Variations , 1990 .

[22]  Vincenzo Carbone,et al.  Multifractal and Chaotic Properties of Solar Wind at MHD and Kinetic Domains: An Empirical Mode Decomposition Approach , 2019, Entropy.

[23]  G. Consolini,et al.  On fast and slow Earth’s magnetospheric dynamics during geomagnetic storms: a stochastic Langevin approach , 2018 .

[24]  Norden E. Huang,et al.  Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition: a Noise-Assisted Data Analysis Method , 2009, Adv. Data Sci. Adapt. Anal..

[25]  Christopher H. K. Chen,et al.  Arbitrary-order Hilbert Spectral Analysis and Intermittency in Solar Wind Density Fluctuations , 2018, 1804.02169.

[26]  G. Consolini,et al.  Local intermittency measure analysis of AE index: The directly driven and unloading component , 2005 .

[27]  Vadim M. Uritsky,et al.  Low frequency 1/f-like fluctuations of the AE-index as a possible manifestation of self-organized criticality in the magnetosphere , 1998 .

[28]  Norden E. Huang,et al.  A review on Hilbert‐Huang transform: Method and its applications to geophysical studies , 2008 .

[29]  Giuseppe Consolini,et al.  Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics On the multi-scale nature of large geomagnetic storms : an empirical mode decomposition analysis , 2012 .

[30]  Edward J. Smith,et al.  The nonlinear response of AE to the IMF BS driver: A spectral break at 5 hours , 1990 .

[31]  F. Takens Detecting strange attractors in turbulence , 1981 .

[32]  R. Hajra,et al.  Characterization of high-intensity, long-duration continuous auroral activity (HILDCAA) events using recurrence quantification analysis , 2017 .

[33]  Thomas K. D. M. Peron,et al.  Entropy of weighted recurrence plots. , 2014, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[34]  Christophe Letellier,et al.  Estimating the Shannon entropy: recurrence plots versus symbolic dynamics. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[35]  B. Tsurutani,et al.  Geomagnetic sudden impulses and storm sudden commencements - A note on terminology , 1990 .

[36]  Stephen J. Matthews,et al.  Nonlinear Response , 2003 .

[37]  Giuseppe Consolini,et al.  Complexity, Forced and/or Self-Organized Criticality, and Topological Phase Transitions in Space Plasmas , 2003 .

[38]  N. Huang,et al.  A new view of nonlinear water waves: the Hilbert spectrum , 1999 .

[39]  Y. Kamide,et al.  Two‐component auroral electrojet: Importance for substorm studies , 1996 .

[40]  D. Ruelle,et al.  Recurrence Plots of Dynamical Systems , 1987 .

[41]  I. Coco,et al.  Latitudinal dependence of geomagnetically induced currents during geomagnetic storms , 2018, Annals of Geophysics.

[42]  J. Wanliss,et al.  High-resolution global storm index: Dst versus SYM-H , 2006 .

[43]  Jürgen Kurths,et al.  Recurrence plots for the analysis of complex systems , 2009 .

[44]  Jürgen Kurths,et al.  Recurrence networks—a novel paradigm for nonlinear time series analysis , 2009, 0908.3447.

[45]  Giuseppe Consolini,et al.  SELF-ORGANIZED CRITICALITY: A NEW PARADIGM FOR THE MAGNETOTAIL DYNAMICS , 2002 .

[46]  Masahisa Sugiura,et al.  Auroral electrojet activity index AE and its universal time variations. , 1966 .

[47]  Jürgen Kurths,et al.  Unified functional network and nonlinear time series analysis for complex systems science: The pyunicorn package. , 2015, Chaos.

[48]  I. Coco,et al.  A Preliminary Risk Assessment of Geomagnetically Induced Currents over the Italian Territory , 2019, Space Weather.

[49]  Norbert Marwan,et al.  The geometry of chaotic dynamics — a complex network perspective , 2011, 1102.1853.

[50]  G. Consolini,et al.  A Hilbert-Huang transform approach to space plasma turbulence at kinetic scales , 2017 .

[51]  J. Kurths,et al.  Complex network approaches to nonlinear time series analysis , 2019, Physics Reports.

[52]  J. Kurths,et al.  Temporal organization of magnetospheric fluctuations unveiled by recurrence patterns in the Dst index. , 2018, Chaos.