Rapid Figure – Ground Responses to Stereograms Reveal an Advantage for a Convex Foreground
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Donald D. Hoffman,et al. Codon constraints on closed 2D shapes , 1985, Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process..
[2] M. Bertamini,et al. The Importance of Being Convex: An Advantage for Convexity when Judging Position , 2001, Perception.
[3] F. Attneave. Multistability in perception. , 1971, Scientific American.
[4] Walter Gerbino,et al. Convexity and Symmetry in Figure-Ground Organization , 1976 .
[5] R. Basri,et al. The role of convexity in perceptual completion: beyond good continuation , 1999, Vision Research.
[6] D G Pelli,et al. The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.
[7] Paul L. Rosin. Shape Partitioning by Convexity , 1999, BMVC.
[8] Glyn W. Humphreys,et al. A Search Asymmetry Reversed by Figure-Ground Assignment , 2000, Psychological science.
[9] J. Hulleman,et al. Concavities as basic features in visual search: Evidence from search asymmetries , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.
[10] Philip J Kellman,et al. Surface integration influences depth discrimination , 2000, Vision Research.
[11] Marco Bertamini,et al. Visual search for a circular region perceived as a figure versus as a hole: Evidence of the importance of part structure , 2006, Perception & psychophysics.
[12] S. Palmer. Vision Science : Photons to Phenomenology , 1999 .
[13] Anastasia V Flevaris,et al. Exogenous spatial attention influences figure-ground assignment. , 2010, Psychological science.
[14] J. Feldman,et al. Information along contours and object boundaries. , 2005, Psychological review.
[15] Marco Bertamini,et al. Who Owns the Contour of a Visual Hole? , 2006, Perception.
[16] Marco Bertamini,et al. The shape of holes , 2003, Cognition.
[17] N Bruno,et al. Amodal completion of partly occluded surfaces: is there a mosaic stage? , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[18] Shinsuke Shimojo,et al. Visual surface representation: a critical link between lower-level and higher level vision , 1995 .
[19] I. Rock. The Logic of Perception , 1983 .
[20] Johan Wagemans,et al. Characteristics and models of human symmetry detection , 1997, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[21] Jacob Feldman,et al. Detection of change in shape: an advantage for concavities , 2003, Cognition.
[22] Stephen E. Palmer,et al. Perceptual Organization in Vision , 2002 .
[23] B. Gillam,et al. Perspective Based on Stereopsis and Occlusion , 2001, Psychological science.
[24] Marco Bertamini,et al. Detection of change in shape and its relation to part structure. , 2005, Acta psychologica.
[25] Johannes Burge,et al. Ordinal configural cues combine with metric disparity in depth perception. , 2005, Journal of vision.
[26] W. Gerbino,et al. Contour curvature polarity and surface interpolation , 2005, Vision Research.
[27] Hsing-Kuo Kenneth Pao,et al. A Continuous Shape Descriptor by Orientation Diffusion , 2001, EMMCVPR.
[28] Marco Bertamini,et al. Early Computation of Contour Curvature and Part Structure: Evidence from Holes , 2004, Perception.
[29] Manfredo Massironi,et al. The Psychology of Graphic Images: Seeing, Drawing, Communicating , 2001 .
[30] Anastasia V. Flevaris,et al. Exogenous Spatial Attention Influences Figure-Ground Assignment , 2004 .