Optimization of an experimental membrane reactor for low-temperature methane steam reforming

The systematic and rigorous model-based optimization of the configuration and operating conditions of a methane membrane steam reforming reactor for hydrogen production is performed. A permeable membrane with Pd–Ru deposited on a ceramic dense support is used to selectively remove the produced hydrogen from the reaction zone. The shifted chemical equilibrium towards hydrogen production enables the achievement of high methane conversion at relatively low reactor temperature levels. Steam reforming takes place over a Ni–Pt/CeZnLa ceramic foam-supported catalyst that ensures better thermal distribution, at an operating temperature of 773 K and a pressure of 106 Pa. A nonlinear, two-dimensional, and pseudo-homogeneous mathematical model of the membrane fixed-bed reactor is developed and subsequently validated using experimental data. For model validation purposes, two sets of experiments have been performed at the experimental reactor installed at CPERI/CERTH. The first set of experiments aims to investigate membrane permeability in order to estimate the parameters involved in the applied Sieverts law. The second set of experiments explores the performance of the membrane reactor at different steam to carbon ratios and total inlet volumetric flowrates. The derived mathematical model, consisted of mass, energy, and momentum balances that consider both axial and radial gradients of temperature and concentration, is then utilized within a model-based optimization framework that calculates the optimal operating conditions for the highly interactive reactor system. The optimal steam to carbon ratio and sweep gas flow rate that minimize the overall methane utilization (i.e., reformed methane and equivalent methane for heating purposes) are calculated for a range of hydrogen production rates. Τhe optimal reactor design configuration described by the length of the catalyst zone is also obtained for a given pure hydrogen production rate.

[1]  Suthida Authayanun,et al.  Enhancement of Hydrogen Production for Steam Reforming of Biogas in Fluidized Bed Membrane Reactor , 2014 .

[2]  Jiří Jaromír Klemeš,et al.  Recent advances in green energy and product productions, environmentally friendly, healthier and safer technologies and processes, CO2 capturing, storage and recycling, and sustainability assessment in decision-making , 2015, Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy.

[3]  M. De Falco,et al.  Simulation of large-scale membrane reformers by a two-dimensional model , 2007 .

[4]  Lidija Čuček,et al.  Significance of environmental footprints for evaluating sustainability and security of development , 2015, Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy.

[5]  Subhas K. Sikdar,et al.  Sustainability in the context of process engineering , 2015, Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy.

[6]  Hengyong Xu,et al.  Experimental and simulation studies on concentration polarization in H2 enrichment by highly permeable and selective Pd membranes , 2006 .

[7]  S. Tosti,et al.  Experimental and modeling studies on the low-temperature water-gas shift reaction in a dense Pd―Ag packed-bed membrane reactor , 2011 .

[8]  R. Hughes,et al.  A simulative comparison of dense and microporous membrane reactors for the steam reforming of methane , 1998 .

[9]  Martyn V. Twigg,et al.  Fundamentals and applications of structured ceramic foam catalysts , 2007 .

[10]  R. Hughes,et al.  The effect of external mass transfer, competitive adsorption and coking on hydrogen permeation through thin Pd/Ag membranes , 2002 .

[11]  S. Hwang.  Fundamentals of membrane transport , 2011 .

[12]  G. Froment,et al.  Methane steam reforming, methanation and water‐gas shift: I. Intrinsic kinetics , 1989 .

[13]  Petar Sabev Varbanov,et al.  Process innovation through Integration approaches at multiple scales: a perspective , 2014, Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy.

[14]  A. Lemonidou,et al.  Low temperature methane steam reforming: Catalytic activity and coke deposition study , 2013 .

[15]  L. Marrelli,et al.  Reformer and membrane modules plant powered by a nuclear reactor or by a solar heated molten salts: Assessment of the design variables and production cost evaluation , 2008 .

[16]  Mohammad Farsi,et al.  A modified membrane SMR reactor to produce large-scale syngas: modeling and multi objective optimization , 2015 .

[17]  Pietro Tarquini,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment of a High Temperature Molten Salt Concentrated Solar Power Plant , 2011 .

[18]  Hugo A. Jakobsen,et al.  Numerical study of hydrogen production by the sorption-enhanced steam methane reforming process with online CO2 capture as operated in fluidized bed reactors , 2011 .

[19]  P. Seferlis,et al.  Modeling and Simulation of a Membrane Reactor for the Low Temperature Methane Steam Reforming , 2013 .

[20]  G. Froment,et al.  Modeling of Dual-Zone Structured Reactors for Natural Gas Steam Reforming , 2013 .

[21]  R. Dittmeyer,et al.  Methane steam reforming operation and thermal stability of new porous metal supported tubular palladium composite membranes , 2013 .

[22]  Jam Hans Kuipers,et al.  Modelling of packed bed membrane reactors for autothermal production of ultrapure hydrogen , 2006 .

[23]  Michael A. Saunders,et al.  MINOS 5. 0 user's guide , 1983 .

[24]  G. Manzolini,et al.  H2 production by low pressure methane steam reforming in a Pd–Ag membrane reactor over a Ni-based catalyst: Experimental and modeling , 2010 .

[25]  Donald Huisingh,et al.  Hydrogen for a sustainable global economy , 2010 .

[26]  Fausto Gallucci,et al.  A simulation study of the steam reforming of methane in a dense tubular membrane reactor , 2004 .

[27]  V. Palma,et al.  Methane auto-thermal reforming on honeycomb and foam structured catalysts: The role of the support on system performances , 2013 .

[28]  Enrico Drioli,et al.  Effect of energy transport on a palladium-based membrane reactor for methane steam reforming process , 2001 .

[29]  Fabiano A.N. Fernandes,et al.  Methane steam reforming modeling in a palladium membrane reactor , 2006 .

[30]  V. Utgikar,et al.  Transition to hydrogen economy in the United States: A 2006 status report , 2007 .

[31]  Akira Endo,et al.  Optimal design and operation of methane steam reforming in a porous ceramic membrane reactor for hydrogen production , 2007 .

[32]  L. D. Paola,et al.  Methane membrane steam reforming: Heat duty assessment , 2014 .

[33]  Marcello De Falco,et al.  Membrane Reactors for Hydrogen Production Processes , 2011 .

[34]  F. Gironi,et al.  Solar steam reforming for enriched methane production: Reactor configurations modeling and comparison , 2014 .

[35]  Bernard P. A. Grandjean,et al.  Methane steam reforming in asymmetric Pd- and Pd-Ag/porous SS membrane reactors , 1994 .

[36]  Simira Papadopoulou,et al.  Enhancement of pure hydrogen production through the use of a membrane reactor , 2014 .

[37]  J. P. Hook.  Methane-steam reforming , 1980 .

[38]  D. Jansen,et al.  Towards application of palladium membrane reactors in large scale production of hydrogen , 2009 .

[39]  D. Simakov,et al.  Model‐based optimization of hydrogen generation by methane steam reforming in autothermal packed‐bed membrane reformer , 2011 .

[40]  Pavel Lestinsky,et al.  The removal of CO2 from biogas using a laboratory PSA unit: design using breakthrough curves , 2015, Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy.

[41]  Aydin K. Sunol,et al.  Modeling and simulation of methane steam reforming in a thermally coupled membrane reactor , 2007 .