Assessing the impact of occupant behaviour on electricity consumption for lighting and small power in office buildings

Lighting and small power will typically account for more than half of the total electricity consumption in an office building. Significant variations in electricity used by different tenants suggest that occupants can have a significant impact on the electricity demand for these end-uses. Yet current modelling techniques fail to represent the interaction between occupant and the building environment in a realistic manner. Understanding the impact of such behaviours is crucial to improve the methodology behind current energy modelling techniques, aiming to minimise the significant gap between predicted and in-use performance of buildings. A better understanding of the impact of occupant behaviour on electricity consumption can also inform appropriate energy saving strategies focused on behavioural change. This paper reports on a study aiming to assess the intent of occupants to switch off lighting and appliances when not in use in office buildings. Based on the Theory of Planned Behaviour, the assessment takes the form of a questionnaire and investigates three predictors to behaviour individually: 1) behavioural attitude; 2) subjective norms; 3) perceived behavioural control. The paper details the development of the assessment procedure and discusses preliminary findings from the study. The questionnaire results are compared against electricity consumption data for individual zones within a multi-tenanted office building. Initial results demonstrate a statistically significant correlation between perceived behavioural control and energy consumption for lighting and small power.

[1]  J. Grimshaw,et al.  Constructing questionnaires based on the theory of planned behaviour: A manual for health services researchers , 2004 .

[2]  Max Donath,et al.  American Control Conference , 1993 .

[3]  Jinlong Ouyang,et al.  Energy-saving potential by improving occupants’ behavior in urban residential sector in Hangzhou City, China , 2009 .

[4]  Dino Bouchlaghem,et al.  Predicted vs. actual energy performance of non-domestic buildings: Using post-occupancy evaluation data to reduce the performance gap , 2012 .

[5]  E. Derijcke,et al.  Residential behavior in sustainable houses , 2006 .

[6]  M. Conner,et al.  Efficacy of the Theory of Planned Behaviour: a meta-analytic review. , 2001, The British journal of social psychology.

[7]  Neil Allan,et al.  Low-energy dwellings: the contribution of behaviours to actual performance , 2010 .

[8]  K. Steemers,et al.  Household energy consumption: a study of the role of occupants , 2009 .

[9]  D. McKenzie‐Mohr,et al.  Promoting Sustainable Behavior : An Introduction to Community-Based Social Marketing , 2000 .

[10]  Chenda Liao,et al.  An integrated approach to occupancy modeling and estimation in commercial buildings , 2010, Proceedings of the 2010 American Control Conference.

[11]  Robert H. Socolow,et al.  Twin Rivers program on energy conservation in housing: highlights and conclusions , 1978 .

[12]  M. Conner,et al.  The Theory of Planned Behaviour , 2004 .

[13]  O. T. Masoso,et al.  The dark side of occupants’ behaviour on building energy use , 2010 .

[14]  P Pieter-Jan Hoes,et al.  User behavior in whole building simulation , 2009 .

[15]  Mari Martiskainen,et al.  Affecting consumer behaviour on energy demand , 2007 .

[16]  Benjamin C. M. Fung,et al.  A systematic procedure to study the influence of occupant behavior on building energy consumption , 2011 .

[17]  Darren Robinson,et al.  The impact of occupants' behaviour on building energy demand , 2011 .