Analysing ISD performance using narrative networks, routines and mindfulness

Abstract Context While the ISD process and in particular Requirement Elicitation has been defined as a collaborative social interaction, visualisations fail to accurately capture the multifaceted nature of the social process. Instead, ISD visualisations focus on presenting a more mechanical/technical perspective, ultimately restricting an opportunity to better analyse the process. Objective With particular focus on Requirements Elicitation this study utilises the narrative network technique to visualise the ISD process as a live routine with the aim to detail the ideal and actual aspects of ISD. The ideal aspect consists of the abstract, generalised understandings of the human actors regarding enacting a routine. Being a live routine, the reality is that adjustments/variations are a common occurrence and need to be taken into account. Enabling the opportunity to identify patterns of action within the routine, the study also incorporates organisational mindfulness to provide further social analysis of these patterns of action. Method In light of the lack of theoretical maturity around the viewing of an ISD process as a ‘live routine’, this exploratory research sought to build theory using a single instrumental case study spanning over 3 years (several ISD projects) and a variety of methods (e.g. workshop, experiment). Results Visualising the ISD process as a live routine it was possible to identify a number of patterns of action. These patterns were triangulated against the organisational mindfulness analysis of the case data to highlight underlying mindless behaviours. A rule was then implemented (experimentally) during the first iteration of a new ISD project and notable improvements in the ISD process were observed. Furthermore, the knock on organisational impact of the experimental implementation of the rule is also examined. Conclusion From a practitioner perspective the study provides an alternative method for analysing the ISD process of an organisation and highlights the benefits of observing the ISD process as a live routine. From an academic perspective, contributions are made to both the ISD and Organisational body of knowledge.

[1]  F. Vella,et al.  The power of mindful learning , 1997 .

[2]  David C. Thomas.  Domain and Development of Cultural Intelligence , 2006 .

[3]  Sabine Matook,et al.  Mindfulness and Agile Software Development , 2008 .

[4]  E. Burton Swanson,et al.  Innovating Mindfully with Information Technology , 2004, MIS Q..

[5]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[6]  Elizabeth White Baker,et al.  Why situational method engineering is useful to information systems development , 2011, Inf. Syst. J..

[7]  Thompson S. H. Teo,et al.  A framework for stakeholder oriented mindfulness: case of RFID implementation at YCH Group, Singapore , 2011, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[8]  Daniela Cruzes,et al.  Interpretative case studies on agile team productivity and management , 2013, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[9]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Crossing an Apparent Chasm: Bridging Mindful and Less-Mindful Perspectives on Organizational Learning , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[10]  N. Denzin,et al.  Handbook of Qualitative Research. Second Edition. , 2000 .

[11]  G. Bolton.  Reliability , 2003, Medical Humanities.

[12]  A. Woodside.  Building Theory from Case Study Research , 2016 .

[13]  Martha S. Feldman,et al.  Narrative Networks: Patterns of Technology and Organization , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[14]  Xiaotong Li,et al.  Uncertainty profile and software project performance: A cross-national comparison , 2004, J. Syst. Softw..

[15]  Ari-Pekka Hameri,et al.  What to be implemented at the early stage of a large-scale project , 1997 .

[16]  Mikko Valorinta,et al.  Information technology and mindfulness in organizations , 2009 .

[17]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  The Case Research Strategy in Studies of Information Systems , 1987, MIS Q..

[18]  Samer Faraj,et al.  Using narrative networks to study enterprise systems and organizational change , 2011, Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst..

[19]  Felicity Kelliher.  INTERPRETIVISM AND THE PURSUIT OF RESEARCH LEGITIMISATION: AN INTEGRATED APPROACH TO SINGLE CASE DESIGN. , 2005 .

[20]  Rory V. O'Connor,et al.  The situational factors that affect the software development process: Towards a comprehensive reference framework , 2012, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[21]  Colin J. Neill,et al.  The extreme programming bandwagon: revolution or just revolting? , 2003 .

[22]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  A Synthesis of Research on Requirements Analysis and Knowledge Acquisition Techniques , 1992, MIS Q..

[23]  Sean W. Hansen,et al.  Getting on the same page: Collective hermeneutics in a systems development team , 2010, Inf. Organ..

[24]  Yuzhu Li,et al.  External social capital and information systems development team flexibility , 2011, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[25]  George Mangalaraj,et al.  Challenges of migrating to agile methodologies , 2005, CACM.

[26]  Chien-Lung Chan,et al.  The impact of software process standardization on software flexibility and project management performance: Control theory perspective , 2008, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[27]  Dietmar Pfahl,et al.  Using simulation to analyse the impact of software requirement volatility on project performance , 2000, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[28]  R. Sternberg.  Images of Mindfulness , 2000 .

[29]  Christian Gärtner.  Putting new wine into old bottles , 2011 .

[30]  Glenn J. Browne,et al.  Improving requirements elicitation: an empirical investigation of procedural prompts , 2007, Inf. Syst. J..

[31]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Strategy in Studies of Information Systems , 2016 .

[32]  Thích Nhất Hạnh.  The Miracle of Mindfulness , 1975 .

[33]  Brian S. Butler,et al.  The Assessment of Organizational Mindfulness Processes for the Effective Assimilation of IT Innovations , 2009, J. Decis. Syst..

[34]  C. Marlene Fiol,et al.  Waking Up! Mindfulness in the Face of Bandwagons , 2003 .

[35]  Martin Messner,et al.  Reflection and Mindfulness in Organizations: Rationales and Possibilities for Integration , 2009 .

[36]  Heshan Sun,et al.  Toward a Model of Mindfulness in Technology Acceptance , 2010, ICIS.

[37]  L. G. Pee,et al.  Knowledge Sharing in Information Systems Development: A Social Interdependence Perspective , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[38]  John McAvoy,et al.  Utilising mindfulness to analyse agile global software development , 2011, ECIS.

[39]  Martha S. Feldman,et al.  Designing routines: On the folly of designing artifacts, while hoping for patterns of action , 2008, Inf. Organ..

[40]  Brian T. Pentland,et al.  Comparing Organizational Routines as Recurrent Patterns of Action , 2010 .

[41]  Fred Thompson,et al.  Business Strategy and the Boyd Cycle , 1995 .

[42]  Brian S. Butler,et al.  Reliability, Mindfulness, and Information Systems , 2006, MIS Q..

[43]  Linda Argote,et al.  CROSSROADS - Introduction to Mindfulness , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[44]  Kenneth M. Anderson,et al.  A View of Software Development Environments Based on Activity Theory , 2002, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[45]  Suzanne Rivard,et al.  A Multilevel Model of Resistance to Information Technology Implementation , 2005, MIS Q..

[46]  Saonee Sarker,et al.  An Exploration into the Process of Requirements Elicitation: A Grounded Approach , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[47]  Sudhir Gupta,et al.  Case Studies , 2013, Journal of Clinical Immunology.

[48]  Tuure Tuunanen,et al.  A Contigency Model for Requirements Development , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[49]  M. Feldman.  A performative perspective on stability and change in organizational routines , 2003 .

[50]  K. Weick,et al.  Organizing for high reliability: Processes of collective mindfulness. , 1999 .