Piping and woody plants in peatlands: Cause or effect?

[1] This paper presents, for the first time, evidence to show that Calluna species are one causative factor of piping in blanket peat catchments. Ground-penetrating radar survey on 960 plots illustrated that piping was prevalent throughout blanket peats. However, soil pipe occurrence was significantly higher where bare peat (149 pipes/km) or Calluna (87 pipes/km) were present compared to other species (67 pipes/km). A case study catchment where there was an altitudinal limit to Calluna provided some control over potential factors that may lead to an association between piping and Calluna. Under the controlled conditions of topographic index, peat depth, and water table, piping was greater under the Calluna-covered peat than under other vegetation covers. Laboratory experiments demonstrated that 10 years worth of rainfall was enough to almost double the proportion of macropore flow occurring in recently colonized Calluna peatlands. This suggests that given enough water and time, the woody Calluna plants result in water being preferentially channeled through the upper peat. Improvements are therefore required in our understanding of the relationships between peatland plant nutrient and water supply and the feedbacks between ecosystem functioning and landform development. These results are also important given the propensity to encourage Calluna growth for game bird enhancement in many northern peatlands.

[1]  Joseph Holden,et al.  Piping and pipeflow in a deep peat catchment , 2002 .

[2]  Joseph Holden,et al.  Laboratory experiments on drought and runoff in blanket peat , 2002 .

[3]  J. Holden,et al.  Runoff production in blanket peat covered catchments , 2003 .

[4]  J.A.A. Jones.  Chapter 5. Piping effects in humid lands , 1990 .

[5]  J. Holden,et al.  Hydrological studies on blanket peat: the significance of the acrotelm‐catotelm model , 2003 .

[6]  J. Holden,et al.  Runoff generation and water table fluctuations in blanket peat: evidence from UK data spanning the dry summer of 1995 , 1999 .

[7]  N. Cox,et al.  Macroporosity and infiltration in blanket peat: the implications of tension disc infiltrometer measurements , 2001 .

[8]  R. A. Smith,et al.  Field Estimates of Primary Production , 1978 .

[9]  J. A. Jones.  The role of natural pipeflow in hillslope drainage and erosion: Extrapolating from the Maesnant data , 1997 .

[10]  J. Adamson,et al.  The Moor House long‐term upland temperature record: New evidence of recent warming , 2002 .

[11]  T. Burt,et al.  Rainfall simulators for investigating soil response to rainfall , 1989 .

[12]  Lorraine N. Smith,et al.  Wound management: a literature review. , 1998, Journal of clinical nursing.

[13]  M. Rawes,et al.  FURTHER STUDIES ON SHEEP GRAZING IN THE NORTHERN PENNINES , 1966 .

[14]  T. Burt,et al.  Infiltration, runoff and sediment production in blanket peat catchments: implications of field rainfall simulation experiments , 2002 .

[15]  T. Burt,et al.  Hydraulic conductivity in upland blanket peat: measurement and variability , 2003 .

[16]  J. Rodwell,et al.  British Plant Communities, Volume 2: Mires and Heaths , 1998 .

[17]  B. Moss,et al.  Mires : swamp, bog, fen, and moor , 1984 .

[18]  M. Newson,et al.  Soil pipes and pipeflow: A hydrological study in upland Wales , 1980 .

[19]  J. A. Jones,et al.  Factors controlling the distribution of piping in Britain: a reconnaissance , 1997 .

[20]  Joseph Holden,et al.  Hydrological connectivity of soil pipes determined by ground‐penetrating radar tracer detection , 2004 .

[21]  G. G. Parker,et al.  The Nature of Soil Piping—A Review of Research , 1985 .

[22]  R. A. Smith,et al.  Introduction and Site Description , 1978 .

[23]  R. Bales,et al.  Spatial variability of snow chemistry in an alpine snowpack, southern Wyoming , 2003 .

[24]  D. R. Coates,et al.  Groundwater geomorphology : the role of subsurface water in earth-surface processes and landforms , 1990 .

[25]  J. S. Rodwell,et al.  Mires and heaths , 1991 .

[26]  J. A. Jones.  Modelling flow in natural soil pipes and its impact on plant ecology in mountain wetlands , 1991 .

[27]  R. Bryan,et al.  The significance of soil piping processes: inventory and prospect , 1997 .

[28]  M. Rawes,et al.  The vegetation of the moor house national nature reserve in the northern Pennines, England , 1968, Vegetatio.

[29]  Joseph Holden,et al.  Controls of soil pipe frequency in upland blanket peat , 2005 .

[30]  J. Hutchinson,et al.  Hillslope Form and Process , 1973 .

[31]  J. Holden,et al.  Artificial drainage of peatlands: hydrological and hydrochemical process and wetland restoration , 2004 .

[32]  Piping effects in humid lands. , 1990 .

[33]  Joseph Holden,et al.  Application of ground‐penetrating radar to the identification of subsurface piping in blanket peat , 2002 .

[34]  J. A. Jones.  Pipeflow contributing areas and runoff response , 1997 .

[35]  C. G. Higgins,et al.  Chapter 6. Gully development , 1990 .

[36]  J. S. Rodwell,et al.  British Plant Communities: British Plant Communities , 2000 .