Comparison of a Virtual Game-Day Experience on Varying Devices

Collegiate athletics, particularly football, provide tremendous value to schools through branding, revenue, and publicity. As a result, extensive effort is put into recruiting talented students. When recruiting, home games are exceptional tools used to show a school's unique game-day atmosphere. However, this is not a viable option during the offseason or for off-site visits. This paper explores a solution to these challenges by using virtual reality (VR) to recreate the game-day experience. The Virtual Reality Application Center in conjunction with Iowa State University (ISU) athletics, created a VR application mimicking the game-day experience at ISU. This application was displayed using the world's highest resolution six-sided CAVETM, an Oculus Rift DK2 computer-driven head mounted display (HMD) and a Merge VR smart phone-driven HMD. A between-subjects user study compared presence between the different systems and a video control. In total, 82 students participated, indicating their presence using the Witmer and Singer questionnaire. Results revealed that while the CAVETM scored the highest in presence, the Oculus and Merge only experienced a slight drop compared to the CAVETM. This result suggests that the mobile ultra-low-cost Merge is a viable alternative to the CAVE TM and Oculus for delivering the game-day experience to ISU recruits.

[1]  Daniel Thalmann,et al.  An evaluation of spatial presence, social presence, and interactions with various 3D displays , 2016, CASA.

[2]  Torsten Reiners,et al.  New landscapes and new eyes: the role of virtual world design for supply chain education , 2014 .

[3]  Doug A. Bowman,et al.  Virtual Reality: How Much Immersion Is Enough? , 2007, Computer.

[4]  Paul M. G. Emmelkamp,et al.  Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy for Anxiety Disorders: The State of the Art , 2011 .

[5]  Frederic D. McKenzie,et al.  Training in Peacekeeping Operations Using Virtual Environments , 2004, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[6]  John P. McIntire,et al.  Virtual reality in a cave: limitations and the need for HMDs? , 2011, Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[7]  Michael J. Singer,et al.  Measuring Presence in Virtual Environments: A Presence Questionnaire , 1998, Presence.

[8]  Joseph J. LaViola,et al.  Understanding user experience in stereoscopic 3D games , 2012, CHI.

[9]  Fabian A. Mulder,et al.  Development of a motion system for an advanced sailing simulator , 2013 .

[10]  Christian Geiger,et al.  Virtual archery with tangible interaction , 2013, 2013 IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces (3DUI).

[11]  C. Craig,et al.  Perceiving and acting upon spaces in a VR rugby task: expertise effects in affordance detection and task achievement. , 2012, Journal of sport & exercise psychology.

[12]  Christine Youngblut.  What a Decade of Experiments Reveals about Factors that Influence the Sense of Presence: Latest Findings , 2006 .

[13]  M. Krijn,et al.  Treatment of acrophobia in virtual reality: the role of immersion and presence. , 2004, Behaviour research and therapy.

[14]  John Powell,et al.  How level of realism influences anxiety in virtual reality environments for a job interview , 2013, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[15]  Martijn J. Schuemie,et al.  Research on Presence in Virtual Reality: A Survey , 2001, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[16]  Mary Czerwinski,et al.  Immersion in desktop virtual reality , 1997, UIST '97.

[17]  Mel Slater,et al.  A Framework for Immersive Virtual Environments (FIVE): Speculations on the Role of Presence in Virtual Environments , 1997, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[18]  Colin Ware,et al.  Reevaluating stereo and motion cues for visualizing graphs in three dimensions , 2005, APGV '05.

[19]  Dennis Proffitt,et al.  Quantifying immersion in virtual reality , 1997, SIGGRAPH.

[20]  H. Keselman,et al.  Consequences of Assumption Violations Revisited: A Quantitative Review of Alternatives to the One-Way Analysis of Variance F Test , 1996 .

[21]  Kwanguk Kim,et al.  Effects of virtual environment platforms on emotional responses , 2014, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[22]  Mel Slater,et al.  Depth of Presence in Virtual Environments , 1994, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.