Simultaneous Intracochlear Stimulation Based on Channel Interaction Compensation: Analysis and First Results

A simultaneous paradigm for electric stimulation of the acoustic nerve based on a monopolar electrode configuration and sign-correlated pulses is presented. Simultaneous pulse amplitudes are determined by taking into account parameters of spatial channel interaction. The computation of simultaneous amplitudes requires the solution of linear systems of equations in an iterative procedure. The computation amount can be reduced significantly, if the spatial impulse responses in individual electrodes can be approximated by two exponentially decaying branches with decay constants alpha toward apex and beta toward base. Generally, the associated inverse of the channel interaction matrix is tridiagonal. Preliminary vowel and consonant identification tests with four cochlear implant patients have been conducted for sequential and simultaneous processor settings. For equal overall pulse repetition rates, comparable speech perception scores were obtained, when the decay constants alpha and beta were set accordingly. Theoretically, the pulse rate of an N-channel system can be increased up to a factor of N as compared to the standard sequential paradigm, and pulses with technically reasonable phase durations can be utilized.

[1]  S. Miyoshi,et al.  Evaluation of the tripolar electrode stimulation method by numerical analysis and animal experiments for cochlear implants. , 1997, Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum.

[2]  P. Stypulkowski,et al.  Single fiber mapping of spatial excitation patterns in the electrically stimulated auditory nerve , 1987, Hearing Research.

[3]  F. Spelman,et al.  Lumped-parameter model for in vivo cochlear stimulation , 1993, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[4]  Fan-Gang Zeng,et al.  Speech recognition with amplitude and frequency modulations. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  P. Montandon,et al.  Intracochlear Potential Distribution with Intracochlear and Extracochlear Electrical Stimulation in Humans , 1991, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[6]  Lucas H M Mens,et al.  Speech Perception with Mono- and Quadrupolar Electrode Configurations: A Crossover Study , 2005, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[7]  David Hilbert,et al.  Grundzüge einer allgemeinen Theorie der linearen Integralgleichungen, von David Hilbert , 1912 .

[8]  Robert P. Morse,et al.  Additive noise can enhance temporal coding in a computational model of analogue cochlear implant stimulation , 1999, Hearing Research.

[9]  Rainer Hartmann,et al.  Spatial resolution of cochlear implants: the electrical field and excitation of auditory afferents , 1998, Hearing Research.

[10]  G. Stickney,et al.  On the dichotomy in auditory perception between temporal envelope and fine structure cues. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  Wiesenfeld,et al.  Theory of stochastic resonance. , 1989, Physical review. A, General physics.

[12]  Zachary M. Smith,et al.  Chimaeric sounds reveal dichotomies in auditory perception , 2002, Nature.

[13]  William M. Rabinowitz,et al.  Better speech recognition with cochlear implants , 1991, Nature.

[14]  Clemens M. Zierhofer Analysis of a linear model for electrical stimulation of axons-critical remarks on the "activating function concept" , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[15]  S. B. Brummer,et al.  Electrical Stimulation with Pt Electrodes: II-Estimation of Maximum Surface Redox (Theoretical Non-Gassing) Limits , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[16]  J. T Rubinstein,et al.  Pseudospontaneous activity: stochastic independence of auditory nerve fibers with electrical stimulation , 1999, Hearing Research.

[17]  Speech Processors for Auditory Prostheses , 2001 .

[18]  Philipos C Loizou,et al.  Comparison of Speech Processing Strategies Used in the Clarion Implant Processor , 2003, Ear and hearing.

[19]  C. D. Geisler,et al.  From Sound to Synapse: Physiology of the Mammalian Ear , 1998 .

[20]  Johan Frijns,et al.  The Facial Nerve Canal: An Important Cochlear Conduction Path Revealed by Clarion Electrical Field Imaging , 2004, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[21]  D. D. Greenwood A cochlear frequency-position function for several species--29 years later. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  Johan H. M. Frijns,et al.  A model of myelinated nerve fibres for electrical prosthesis design , 1994, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[23]  M. Dorman,et al.  The effect of parametric variations of cochlear implant processors on speech understanding. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  Brent Townshend,et al.  Reduction of Electrical Interaction in Auditory Prostheses , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.