Assessment of third-party logistics provider using multi-criteria decision-making approach based on interval rough numbers

Abstract Third-party logistics (3PL) has involved a significant response among researchers and practitioners in the recent decade. In the global competitive scenario, multinational companies (MNCs) not only improve quality of service and increase efficiency, but also decrease costs by means of 3PL. However, the assessment and selection of 3PL is a very critical decision, comprising intricacy due to the existence of various imprecisely based criteria. Also, uncertainty is an unavoidable part of the information in the decision-making process and its importance in the selection process is relatively high and needs to be carefully considered. Consequently, incomplete and inadequate data or information may occur among other various selection criteria, which can be termed as a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) problem. Interval rough numbers are very flexible to model this type of uncertainty occurring in MCDM problems. Thus this paper presents a new integrated interval rough number (IRN) approach based on the Best Worst Method (BWM) and Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment (WASPAS) method along Multi-Attributive Border Approximation area Comparison (MABAC) to evaluate 3PL providers. The hybrid IRN-BWM based methodology is used for computing the priority weights of criteria while IRN-WASPAS and IRN-MABAC are employed to achieve the final ranking of 3PL providers. A computational study is performed to illustrate the proposed approaches along with a sensitivity analysis on different sets of criteria weight coefficient values to validate the stability of the suggested methodology. Consequently, a comparative analysis of the obtained ranking results with their crisp and fuzzy counterparts is also conducted for checking the reliability of the proposed approach. The results display stability in ranking of alternative results and prove the feasibility of the proposed approach to handle MCDM problems with IRNs.

[1]  Jian-qiang Wang,et al.  An Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Likelihood-Based MABAC Approach and Its Application in Selecting Hotels on a Tourism Website , 2017, Int. J. Fuzzy Syst..

[2]  Kannan Govindan,et al.  Interrelationships of risks faced by third party logistics service providers: A DEMATEL based approach , 2016 .

[3]  Aidas Vasilis Vasiliauskas,et al.  Principle and benefits of third party logistics approach when managing logistics supply chain , 2007 .

[4]  S Pamucar Dragan,et al.  Use of the fuzzy AHP-MABAC hybrid model in ranking potential locations for preparing laying-up positions , 2016 .

[5]  Reza Farzipoor Saen,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of third party reverse logistics provider in supply chain by multi objective additive network DEA model , 2015 .

[6]  P. V. Laarhoven,et al.  Third‐Party Logistics: Is There a Future? , 1999 .

[7]  Amrik S. Sohal,et al.  Third party logistics services: a Singapore perspective , 1999 .

[8]  Hu-Chen Liu,et al.  An interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy MABAC approach for material selection with incomplete weight information , 2016, Appl. Soft Comput..

[9]  Amin Vafadarnikjoo,et al.  A grey DEMATEL approach to develop third-party logistics provider selection criteria , 2016, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[10]  Qing Yang,et al.  Evaluation and Classification of Overseas Talents in China Based on the BWM for Intuitionistic Relations , 2016, Symmetry.

[11]  Fatih Ecer,et al.  Third-party logistics (3Pls) provider selection via Fuzzy AHP and EDAS integrated model , 2017 .

[12]  Xin Guo Ming,et al.  A rough TOPSIS Approach for Failure Mode and Effects Analysis in Uncertain Environments , 2014, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int..

[13]  Yong Yang,et al.  Pythagorean Fuzzy Choquet Integral Based MABAC Method for Multiple Attribute Group Decision Making , 2016, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[14]  Tugba Efendigil,et al.  A holistic approach for selecting a third-party reverse logistics provider in the presence of vagueness , 2008, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[15]  Romualdas Bausys,et al.  Garage location selection for residential house by WASPAS-SVNS method , 2017 .

[16]  Dragan Pamucar,et al.  The selection of transport and handling resources in logistics centers using Multi-Attributive Border Approximation area Comparison (MABAC) , 2015, Expert Syst. Appl..

[17]  Seyed Hamid Hashemi,et al.  A grey–based decision–making approach for selecting a reverse logistics provider in a closed loop supply chain , 2015 .

[18]  Hokey Min,et al.  A hybrid quality function deployment and fuzzy decision-making methodology for the optimal selection of third-party logistics service providers , 2013 .

[19]  Kim Hua Tan,et al.  Leveraging the supply chain flexibility of third party logistics - Hybrid knowledge-based system approach , 2008, Expert Syst. Appl..

[20]  Thomas J. Goldsby,et al.  Third-Party Logistics: A Meta-Analytic Review and Investigation of Its Impact on Performance , 2013 .

[21]  Dragan Pamučar,et al.  A Sensitivity analysis in MCDM problems: A statistical approach , 2018, Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering.

[22]  Kai-Ying Chen,et al.  Applying Analytic Network Process in Logistics Service Provider Selection - A Case Study of the Industry Investing in Southeast Asia , 2011, Int. J. Electron. Bus. Manag..

[23]  Slavko Vesković,et al.  A rough multicriteria approach for evaluation of the supplier criteria in automotive industry , 2018 .

[24]  Dragisa Stanujkic,et al.  Selection of Lead-Zinc Flotation Circuit Design by Applying Waspas Method with Single-Valued Neutrosophic Set , 2017 .

[25]  Chandra Prakash,et al.  A combined MCDM approach for evaluation and selection of third-party reverse logistics partner for Indian electronics industry , 2016 .

[26]  Guiyun Liu,et al.  An Integrated SVM and Fuzzy AHP Approach for Selecting Third Party Logistics Providers , 2012 .

[27]  Hu-Chen Liu,et al.  An integrated decision making approach for assessing healthcare waste treatment technologies from a multiple stakeholder. , 2017, Waste management.

[28]  Wei-Kai Wang,et al.  An integrated fuzzy approach for provider evaluation and selection in third-party logistics , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[29]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  On the invalidity of fuzzifying numerical judgments in the Analytic Hierarchy Process , 2007, Math. Comput. Model..

[30]  Samarjit Kar,et al.  A rough strength relational DEMATEL model for analysing the key success factors of hospital service quality , 2018 .

[31]  Jui-Tsung Wong,et al.  DSS for 3PL provider selection in global supply chain: combining the multi-objective optimization model with experts’ opinions , 2012, J. Intell. Manuf..

[32]  Andrius Jarzemskis.  Determination and Evaluation of the Factors of Outsourcing Logistics , 2006 .

[33]  E. Zavadskas,et al.  Optimization of Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment , 2012 .

[34]  Sen Guo,et al.  Fuzzy best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method and its applications , 2017, Knowl. Based Syst..

[35]  Angappa Gunasekaran,et al.  A hybrid data analytic methodology for 3PL transportation provider evaluation using fuzzy multi-criteria decision making , 2015 .

[36]  Ali Emrouznejad,et al.  Strategic logistics outsourcing: An integrated QFD and fuzzy AHP approach , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..

[37]  J. Rezaei.  Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method , 2015 .

[38]  Jurgita Antucheviciene,et al.  Extension of weighted aggregated sum product assessment with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy numbers (WASPAS-IVIF) , 2014, Appl. Soft Comput..

[39]  Wenli Li,et al.  An information granulation entropy-based model for third-party logistics providers evaluation , 2012 .

[40]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  An intuitionistic fuzzy multiplicative best-worst method for multi-criteria group decision making , 2016, Inf. Sci..

[41]  Chandra Prakash,et al.  An analysis of integrated robust hybrid model for third-party reverse logistics partner selection under fuzzy environment , 2016 .

[42]  Reza Farzipoor Saen,et al.  A mathematical model for selecting third-party reverse logistics providers , 2009 .

[43]  Golam Kabir.  THIRD PARTY LOGISTIC SERVICE PROVIDER SELECTION USING FUZZY AHP AND TOPSIS METHOD , 2012 .

[44]  S. G. Deshmukh,et al.  Selection of Third-Party Logistics (3PL): A Hybrid Approach Using Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) and Analytic Network Process (ANP) , 2005 .

[45]  J. Rezaei.  Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method: Some properties and a linear model , 2016 .

[46]  K. J. Rogers,et al.  Evaluating the efficiency of 3PL logistics operations , 2008 .

[47]  Qing Yang,et al.  Approach to Multi-Criteria Group Decision-Making Problems Based on the Best-Worst-Method and ELECTRE Method , 2016, Symmetry.

[48]  Martin Spring,et al.  Third party logistics : a literature review and research agenda , 2007 .

[49]  Vinicius Amorim Sobreiro,et al.  The challenge of selecting and evaluating third-party reverse logistics providers in a multicriteria perspective: a Brazilian case , 2015 .

[50]  Duško Tešić,et al.  A HYBRID FUZZY AHP-MABAC MODEL: APPLICATION IN THE SERBIAN ARMY – THE SELECTION OF THE LOCATION FOR DEEP WADING AS A TECHNIQUE OF CROSSING THE RIVER BY TANKS , 2018 .

[51]  Massimiliano M. Schiraldi,et al.  A logistics provider evaluation and selection methodology based on AHP, DEA and linear programming integration , 2011 .

[52]  Chao-Che Hsu,et al.  Integrating DANP and modified grey relation theory for the selection of an outsourcing provider , 2013, Expert Syst. Appl..

[53]  Mitar Kovač,et al.  Multi-criteria decision-making in A defensive operation of the guided anti-tank missile battery: An example of the hybrid model fuzzy AHP - MABAC , 2018 .

[54]  Yong Wang,et al.  Decision and coordination in a competing retail channel involving a third-party logistics provider , 2014, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[55]  Hosang Jung,et al.  Evaluation of Third Party Logistics Providers Considering Social Sustainability , 2017 .

[56]  P. Murugesan,et al.  Multicriteria group decision making for the third party reverse logistics service provider in the supply chain model using fuzzy TOPSIS for transportation services , 2009, Int. J. Serv. Technol. Manag..

[57]  Vinod Kumar,et al.  Optimal selection of third-party logistics service providers using quality function deployment and Taguchi loss function , 2015 .

[58]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Assessment of third-party logistics providers using a CRITIC–WASPAS approach with interval type-2 fuzzy sets , 2017 .

[59]  Gautam Majumdar,et al.  Appraisement and selection of third party logistics service providers in fuzzy environment , 2013 .

[60]  S. Kendrick,et al.  The Use of Third-Party Logistics Services by Large American Manufacturers, the 2002 Survey , 2002, Transportation Journal.

[61]  Jurgita Antucheviciene,et al.  A Hybrid Model Based on Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy WASPAS for Construction Site Selection , 2015, Int. J. Comput. Commun. Control.

[62]  Dragan Pamuar,et al.  Novel approach to group multi-criteria decision making based on interval rough numbers , 2017 .

[63]  Ramesh Anbanandam,et al.  A robust hybrid multi-criteria decision making methodology for contractor evaluation and selection in third-party reverse logistics , 2014, Expert Syst. Appl..

[64]  A. Marasco.  Third-party logistics: A literature review , 2008 .

[65]  Tomi Solakivi,et al.  Logistics outsourcing, its motives and the level of logistics costs in manufacturing and trading companies operating in Finland , 2013 .

[66]  Lori Tavasszy,et al.  Linking supplier development to supplier segmentation using Best Worst Method , 2015, Expert Syst. Appl..

[67]  Hong Wang,et al.  A 3PL supplier selection model based on fuzzy sets , 2012, Comput. Oper. Res..

[68]  Dragan Pamučar,et al.  Application of the GIS-DANP-MABAC multi-criteria model for selecting the location of wind farms: A case study of Vojvodina, Serbia , 2017 .

[69]  Muhamad Zameri Mat Saman,et al.  A systematic review and meta-Analysis of SWARA and WASPAS methods: Theory and applications with recent fuzzy developments , 2017, Appl. Soft Comput..

[70]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Multiple criteria decision-making techniques in transportation systems: a systematic review of the state of the art literature , 2015 .

[71]  Gülşen Akman,et al.  Logistics Service Provider Selection through an Integrated Fuzzy Multicriteria Decision Making Approach , 2014 .

[72]  Siba Sankar Mahapatra,et al.  Fuzzy based appraisement module for 3PL evaluation and selection , 2015 .

[73]  Jingzheng Ren,et al.  Urban sewage sludge, sustainability, and transition for Eco-City: Multi-criteria sustainability assessment of technologies based on best-worst method , 2017 .

[74]  Aicha Aguezzoul,et al.  Third-party logistics selection problem: A literature review on criteria and methods , 2014 .

[75]  Shaligram Pokharel,et al.  A hybrid approach using ISM and fuzzy TOPSIS for the selection of reverse logistics provider , 2009 .

[76]  Yue-Jin Lv,et al.  A multiple attribute decision making method with interval rough numbers based on the possibility degree , 2014, 2014 10th International Conference on Natural Computation (ICNC).