Alignment and Misalignment in Business Relationships

Abstract ‘Alignment’ and ‘misalignment’ are terms commonly used both in strategy and in marketing. In B-to-B marketing, in particular, researchers investigated alignment/misalignment between customers and suppliers and recently discussed the effects of misalignment. Research in this field remains however fragmented. There is ambiguity about the objects to be aligned, the processes that characterize their change, the effects on the relationship development and the methods used to assess them. In general, the empirical research that has examined the two concepts in business relationships is limited. In this study we will develop a theoretical framework to assess alignments/misalignments in parties' interpretations of a problem and its solution for the customer, in order to address the following questions: How and why do alignment and misalignment change over time? When can misalignment be positive for the relationship development? We use data from a longitudinal study involving 84 customers and suppliers in the ICT Security Industry. The first finding is that there are no patterns in how alignment changes, but there is a slight tendency toward misalignment over time. Second, change in the alignment is mostly linked to parties' perceptions of the available resources and how these resources are combined, along with parties' interpretations of critical events. Finally, the research suggests that when parties are aware of misalignment, when misalignment is perceptual and when there are no external constraints to action, the effort to align practices produces positive effects, even when misalignment persists.

[1]  Branda Nowell PROBLEM FRAMES IN COMMUNITY COLLABORATIVES: EXPLORING THE EFFECT OF FRAME ALIGNMENT AND OBLIVIOUSNESS. , 2008 .

[2]  David E. Avison,et al.  Using and validating the strategic alignment model , 2004, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[3]  Giovanni Gavetti,et al.  Capabilities, cognition, and inertia: evidence from digital imaging , 2000 .

[4]  Wolfgang Ulaga,et al.  Measuring Customer- Perceived Value in Business Markets A Prerequisite for Marketing Strategy Development and Implementation , 2001 .

[5]  Poul Houman Andersen,et al.  Picture this: Managed change and resistance in business network settings , 2009 .

[6]  T. Jick Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Triangulation in Action. , 1979 .

[7]  Samir Dani,et al.  Demand network alignment: aligning the physical, informational and relationship issues in supply chains , 2007 .

[8]  Tomasz Smaczny Is an alignment between business and information technology the appropriate paradigm to manage IT in today’s organisations? , 2001 .

[9]  A. Cox,et al.  Business Relationships for Competitive Advantage: Managing Alignment and Misalignment in Buyer and Supplier Transactions , 2003 .

[10]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  Strategy safari : a guided tour through the wilds of strategic management , 1998 .

[11]  J. Farley,et al.  Beyond market orientation: When customers and suppliers disagree , 2000 .

[12]  A. Pettigrew Longitudinal Field Research on Change: Theory and Practice , 1990 .

[13]  Jan B. Heide Interorganizational Governance in Marketing Channels , 1994 .

[14]  Daniela Corsaro,et al.  Searching for Relationship Value in Business Markets: Are We Missing Something? , 2010 .

[15]  D. Snow,et al.  Frame alignment processes, micromobilization, and movement participation. , 1986 .

[16]  P. Naudé,et al.  Perceptual gaps and similarities in buyer–seller dyadic relationships , 2007 .

[17]  Christopher M. Scherpereel,et al.  Alignment: the duality of decision problems , 2006 .

[18]  B. Gray Strong opposition: frame‐based resistance to collaboration , 2004 .

[19]  A. Davies Moving base into high-value integrated solutions: a value stream approach , 2004 .

[20]  Sandra Marnoto,et al.  Toward a relational perspective of franchising chains , 2009 .

[21]  Rhona E. Johnsen,et al.  Exploring the concept of asymmetry: A typology for analysing customer–supplier relationships , 2008 .

[22]  Darren Langdridge,et al.  Analyzing Additional Variables in the Theory of Reasoned Action , 2007 .

[23]  Fabrizio Salvador,et al.  STRATEGIC CAPABILITIES FOR MASS CUSTOMIZATION: THEORETICAL SYNTHESIS AND EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE. , 2008 .

[24]  D. Schoen,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action , 1985 .

[25]  C. Rusbult,et al.  Attitude alignment in close relationships. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[26]  Jay R. Galbraith,et al.  The problem of solutions: Balancing clients and capabilities , 2002 .

[27]  Todd Saxton,et al.  The Effects of Partner and Relationship Characteristics On Alliance Outcomes , 1997 .

[28]  A. Parasuraman,et al.  SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. , 1988 .

[29]  L. Coote,et al.  Interfirm behavior and goal alignment in relational exchanges , 2007 .

[30]  Andreas Eggert,et al.  Value-Based Differentiation in Business Relationships: Gaining and Sustaining Key Supplier Status , 2006 .

[31]  Barbara Czarniawska On Time, Space, and Action Nets , 2004 .

[32]  Bernard Cova,et al.  Marketing solutions in accordance with the S-D logic: Co-creating value with customer network actors , 2008 .

[33]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage , 1998 .

[34]  I. Simonson,et al.  Determinants of Customers' Responses to Customized Offers: Conceptual Framework and Research Propositions , 2003 .

[35]  James C. Anderson Relationships in business markets: Exchange episodes, value creation, and their empirical assessment , 1995 .

[36]  Sarah Kaplan Framing Contests: Strategy Making Under Uncertainty , 2008, Organ. Sci..

[37]  Daniela Corsaro,et al.  Roles of actors in combining resources into complex solutions , 2012 .

[38]  Sarah L. Jack Approaches to studying networks: implications and outcomes , 2010 .

[39]  R. Gulati,et al.  Adaptation in Vertical Relationships: Beyond Incentive Conflict , 2005 .

[40]  Suvi Nenonen,et al.  Scripting markets: From value propositions to market propositions , 2011 .

[41]  Susan K. Lippert,et al.  Understanding users' performance evaluation of IT solutions , 2007 .

[42]  C. Grönroos A service perspective on business relationships: The value creation, interaction and marketing interface , 2011 .

[43]  A. Cox Business relationship alignment: on the commensurability of value capture and mutuality in buyer and supplier exchange , 2004 .

[44]  C. Cassell,et al.  Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research , 2004 .

[45]  A. Swaminathan,et al.  Framing Interorganizational Network Change: A Network Inertia Perspective , 2006 .

[46]  Nicolette Lakemond,et al.  Developing integrated solutions: The importance of relationships within the network , 2006 .

[47]  A. V. D. Ven SUGGESTIONS FOR STUDYING STRATEGY PROCESS: A RESEARCH NOTE , 1992 .

[48]  D. Gosselin,et al.  Strategic account management: customer value creation through customer alignment , 2006 .

[49]  Seppo Leminen,et al.  Gaps in buyer‐seller relationships , 2001 .

[50]  Ajay K. Kohli,et al.  Rethinking Customer Solutions: From Product Bundles to Relational Processes , 2007 .

[51]  Annie Pye,et al.  A sensemaking perspective on network pictures , 2010 .

[52]  Jaana Woiceshyn,et al.  Value Creation in Knowledge-Based Firms: Aligning Problems and Resources , 2008 .

[53]  D. Snow,et al.  Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment , 2000 .

[54]  H. Håkansson,et al.  Dyadic Business Relationships within a Business Network Context , 1994 .

[55]  Eric M. Eisenberg,et al.  Jamming Transcendence Through Organizing , 1990 .

[56]  Nicholas Argyres,et al.  Does Transaction Misalignment Matter for Firm Survival at All Stages of the Industry Life Cycle? , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[57]  C. Medlin Interaction in business relationships: A time perspective , 2004 .

[58]  K. Atuahene–Gima,et al.  An Empirical Investigation of the Effect of Market Orientation and Entrepreneurship Orientation Alignment on Product Innovation , 2001 .

[59]  Andreas Eggert,et al.  Value creation in the relationship life cycle: A quasi-longitudinal analysis , 2006 .

[60]  Nigel King,et al.  Using templates in the thematic analysis of text , 2004 .

[61]  George P. Huber,et al.  Cross-Understanding: Implications for Group Cognition and Performance , 2010 .

[62]  Allen Newell,et al.  Human Problem Solving. , 1973 .

[63]  Klaasjan Visscher,et al.  On the construction of problems and solutions in the client-consultant relationship , 2006 .

[64]  Jenny W. Rudolph,et al.  The Dynamics of Action-Oriented Problem Solving: Linking Interpretation and Choice , 2009 .

[65]  A. Pettigrew WHAT IS A PROCESSUAL ANALYSIS. , 1997 .

[66]  Barbara Gray,et al.  Disentangling Approaches to Framing: Mapping the Terrain , 2005 .

[67]  A. Davies,et al.  Charting a path toward integrated solutions , 2006 .

[68]  Enrico Baraldi,et al.  Controlling and combining resources in networks — from Uppsala to Stanford, and back again: The case of a biotech innovation , 2009 .

[69]  Tore Strandvik,et al.  Perception configurations in business relationships , 1999 .

[70]  N. Chorn The “Alignment” Theory: Creating Strategic Fit , 1991 .

[71]  Kathleen M. Sutcliffe,et al.  Special Issue: Frontiers of Organization Science, Part 1 of 2: Organizing and the Process of Sensemaking , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[72]  I. Levin,et al.  How Consumers Are Affected by the Framing of Attribute Information Before and After Consuming the Product , 1988 .

[73]  C. Fiol Consensus, diversity, and learning in organizations. , 1994 .

[74]  Leslie A. Perlow,et al.  Contextualizing Patterns of Work Group Interaction: Toward a Nested Theory of Structuration , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[75]  Mary Tripsas,et al.  Thinking About Technology: Applying a Cognitive Lens to Technical Change , 2008 .

[76]  K. Eisenhardt Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review , 1989 .