Measuring the Contrast Sensitivity Function Using the qCSF Method With 10 Digits

Purpose The Bayesian adaptive quick contrast sensitivity function (qCSF) method with a 10-letter identification task provides an efficient CSF assessment. However, large populations are unfamiliar with letters and cannot benefit from this test. To overcome the barrier, we conducted this study. Method A new font for digits (0∼9) was created. The digits were then filtered with a raised cosine filter, rescaled to different sizes to cover spatial frequencies from 0.5 to 16 cycles per degree (cpd), and used as stimuli in a 10-alternative forced choice (10AFC) digit identification task. With the 10AFC digit identification task, the CSFs of five young and five old observers were measured using the qCSF and Psi methods. The estimates from the latter served as reference. Results The new digit font showed significantly improved similarity structure, Levene's test, F(1, 88) = 6.36, P = 0.014. With the 10-digit identification task, the CSFs obtained with the qCSF method matched well with those obtained with the Psi method (root mean square error [RMSE] = 0.053 log10 units). With approximately 30 trials, the precision of the qCSF method reached 0.1 log10 units. With approximately 75 trials, the precision of the CSFs obtained with the qCSF was comparable to that of the CSFs measured by the Psi method in 150 trials. Conclusions The qCSF with the 10 digit identification task is validated for both young and old observers. Translational Relevance The qCSF method with the 10-digit identification task provides an efficient and precise CSF test especially for people who are unfamiliar with letters.

[1]  A. Watson,et al.  A standard model for foveal detection of spatial contrast. , 2005, Journal of vision.

[2]  S. Klein,et al.  Measuring, estimating, and understanding the psychometric function: A commentary , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[3]  Zhong-Lin Lu,et al.  How arousal modulates the visual contrast sensitivity function. , 2014, Emotion.

[4]  Chris A. Johnson,et al.  Multidimensional Functional and Structural Evaluation Reveals Neuroretinal Impairment in Early Diabetic Retinopathy , 2017, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[5]  David Whitaker,et al.  Neural contribution to spatiotemporal contrast sensitivity decline in healthy ageing eyes , 1990, Vision Research.

[6]  D. Pelli,et al.  A clinical test for visual crowding , 2016 .

[7]  Chris A. Johnson,et al.  Predicting Visual Disability in Glaucoma With Combinations of Vision Measures , 2018, Translational vision science & technology.

[8]  C. Owsley.  Aging and vision , 2011, Vision Research.

[9]  Peter J. Bex,et al.  The Reliability of the quick CSF Method for Contrast Sensitivity Assessment in Low Vision , 2013 .

[10]  Zhong-Lin Lu,et al.  Efficient Characterization and Classification of Contrast Sensitivity Functions in Aging , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[11]  B. Breitmeyer,et al.  Temporal studies with flashed gratings: Inferences about human transient and sustained channels , 1977, Vision Research.

[12]  Leah Blau,et al.  Statistical Models In Epidemiology , 2016 .

[13]  J. Wood,et al.  Letter contrast sensitivity changes in early diabetic retinopathy , 2003, Clinical & experimental optometry.

[14]  F. Jäkel,et al.  Spatial four-alternative forced-choice method is the preferred psychophysical method for naïve observers. , 2006, Journal of vision.

[15]  Michael Dorr,et al.  Using 10AFC to further improve the efficiency of the quick CSF method. , 2015, Journal of vision.

[16]  M. Dorr,et al.  Introducing a new method to assess vision: Computer-adaptive contrast-sensitivity testing predicts visual functioning better than charts in multiple sclerosis patients , 2015, Multiple sclerosis journal - experimental, translational and clinical.

[17]  Sergei Gepshtein,et al.  Sensory adaptation as optimal resource allocation , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  Chang-Bing Huang,et al.  qCSF in clinical application: efficient characterization and classification of contrast sensitivity functions in amblyopia. , 2010, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[19]  Susana T. L. Chung,et al.  Spatial-frequency characteristics of letter identification in central and peripheral vision , 2002, Vision Research.

[20]  B. Brown,et al.  Age-Related Changes in Contrast Sensitivity in Central and Peripheral Retina , 1988, Perception.

[21]  Mark A. Pitt,et al.  A Hierarchical Adaptive Approach to Optimal Experimental Design , 2014, Neural Computation.

[22]  D. H. Kelly,et al.  A study of sine-wave contrast sensitivity by two psychophysical methods , 1973 .

[23]  Chang-Bing Huang,et al.  The external noise normalized gain profile of spatial vision. , 2014, Journal of vision.

[24]  W. Omulecki,et al.  Evaluation of contrast sensitivity measurements after retrobulbar optic neuritis in Multiple Sclerosis , 2014, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[25]  Zhong-Lin Lu,et al.  Non-commercial Research and Educational Use including without Limitation Use in Instruction at Your Institution, Sending It to Specific Colleagues That You Know, and Providing a Copy to Your Institution's Administrator. All Other Uses, Reproduction and Distribution, including without Limitation Comm , 2022 .

[26]  Denis G. Pelli,et al.  THE DESIGN OF A NEW LETTER CHART FOR MEASURING CONTRAST SENSITIVITY , 1988 .

[27]  D Regan,et al.  Visual fields described by contrast sensitivity, by acuity, and by relative sensitivity to different orientations. , 1983, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[28]  C W Tyler,et al.  Colour bit-stealing to enhance the luminance resolution of digital displays on a single pixel basis. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[29]  C. Tyler,et al.  Bayesian adaptive estimation of psychometric slope and threshold , 1999, Vision Research.

[30]  Denis G. Pelli,et al.  ECVP '07 Abstracts , 2007, Perception.

[31]  Linda Lundström,et al.  Blur adaptation: Contrast sensitivity changes and stimulus extent , 2015, Vision Research.

[32]  Zhou Wang,et al.  Complex Wavelet Structural Similarity: A New Image Similarity Index , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[33]  Zhong-Lin Lu,et al.  Bayesian adaptive estimation of the contrast sensitivity function: the quick CSF method. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[34]  Linda Lundström,et al.  Quick contrast sensitivity measurements in the periphery. , 2014, Journal of vision.

[35]  S. Kara,et al.  Repeatability of contrast sensitivity testing in patients with age-related macular degeneration, glaucoma, and cataract. , 2016, Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia.

[36]  R. Sekuler,et al.  Contrast sensitivity throughout adulthood , 1982, Vision Research.

[37]  Cynthia Owsley,et al.  Aging and neural spatial contrast sensitivity: Photopic vision , 1993, Vision Research.

[38]  Luis A. Lesmes,et al.  Development of pattern vision following early and extended blindness , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[39]  Arthur P Ginsburg,et al.  Advances in microincision cataract surgery intraocular lenses , 2006, Current opinion in ophthalmology.

[40]  Hanxiao Liu,et al.  The Topographical Arrangement of Cutoff Spatial Frequencies across Lower and Upper Visual Fields in Mouse V1 , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[41]  M. Bullimore,et al.  Assessing the reliability, discriminative ability, and validity of disability glare tests. , 1993, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[42]  R. F. Hess,et al.  The threshold contrast sensitivity function in strabismic amblyopia: Evidence for a two type classification , 1977, Vision Research.

[43]  Mark A. Pitt,et al.  Evaluating the performance of the quick CSF method in detecting contrast sensitivity function changes , 2016, Journal of vision.

[44]  Kazunori Miyata,et al.  Contrast sensitivity function and ocular higher-order wavefront aberrations in normal human eyes. , 2006, Ophthalmology.

[45]  R A Applegate,et al.  Corneal aberrations and visual performance after radial keratotomy. , 1998, Journal of refractive surgery.

[46]  Lawrence T. DeCarlo,et al.  On a signal detection approach to m-alternative forced choice with bias, with maximum likelihood and Bayesian approaches to estimation , 2012 .

[47]  Richard W. Bulliet.  The Earth and Its Peoples: A Global History , 2008 .

[48]  Arthur P. Ginsburg,et al.  Contrast Sensitivity and Functional Vision , 2003, International ophthalmology clinics.

[49]  L O Harvey,et al.  Identification confusions among letters of the alphabet. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[50]  G. Legge.  Sustained and transient mechanisms in human vision: Temporal and spatial properties , 1978, Vision Research.

[51]  D. Giavarina.  Understanding Bland Altman analysis , 2015, Biochemia medica.

[52]  Luis A. Lesmes,et al.  Discriminating anisometropic amblyopia from myopia based on interocular inhibition , 2015, Vision Research.

[53]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  A revised table of d’ for M-alternative forced choice , 1979 .

[54]  Luis A. Lesmes,et al.  Visual Function Endpoints to Enable Dry AMD Clinical Trials. , 2013, Drug discovery today. Therapeutic strategies.

[55]  C A Hazel,et al.  The usefulness of Vistech and FACT contrast sensitivity charts for cataract and refractive surgery outcomes research , 2003, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[56]  Bharkbhum Khambhiphant,et al.  The new numbers contrast sensitivity chart for contrast sensitivity measurement , 2011 .