Protein Aggregation Capture on Microparticles Enables Multipurpose Proteomics Sample Preparation*

The phenomenon of protein aggregation capture (PAC) on a wide range of different microparticles is described. Exploiting this mechanism enables generation of clean peptide mixtures from cell lines, tissues, and protein pulldowns for proteomics, phosphoproteomics, and secretomics analysis. The findings vastly increase the accessibility of the method that may ultimately lead to low cost and automated proteomics workflows. Graphical Abstract Highlights Insoluble protein aggregates preferentially precipitate on microparticles. The protein aggregation capture (PAC) occurs irrespective of microparticle surface chemistry. This process can be exploited for multi-purpose proteomics sample preparation. Facilitates potential for low cost, efficient and high-sensitivity proteomics workflows. Universal proteomics sample preparation is challenging because of the high heterogeneity of biological samples. Here we describe a novel mechanism that exploits the inherent instability of denatured proteins for nonspecific immobilization on microparticles by protein aggregation capture. To demonstrate the general applicability of this mechanism, we analyzed phosphoproteomes, tissue proteomes, and interaction proteomes as well as dilute secretomes. The findings present a practical, sensitive and cost-effective proteomics sample preparation method.

[1]  Alexandre Zougman,et al.  Suspension trapping (STrap) sample preparation method for bottom‐up proteomics analysis , 2014, Proteomics.

[2]  Matthias Mann,et al.  Direct Proteomic Quantification of the Secretome of Activated Immune Cells , 2013, Science.

[3]  A. Hummon,et al.  Comparison of In-Solution, FASP, and S-Trap Based Digestion Methods for Bottom-Up Proteomic Studies. , 2018, Journal of proteome research.

[4]  J. Olsen,et al.  GeLCMS for in-depth protein characterization and advanced analysis of proteomes. , 2011, Methods in molecular biology.

[5]  G. Brewer,et al.  The regulation of mRNA stability in mammalian cells: 2.0. , 2012, Gene.

[6]  M. Mann,et al.  Stable Isotope Labeling by Amino Acids in Cell Culture, SILAC, as a Simple and Accurate Approach to Expression Proteomics* , 2002, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[7]  Stefan Tenzer,et al.  Evaluation of FASP, SP3, and iST Protocols for Proteomic Sample Preparation in the Low Microgram Range. , 2017, Journal of proteome research.

[8]  Javier Cabrera,et al.  Analysis of Data From Viral DNA Microchips , 2001 .

[9]  Marco Y. Hein,et al.  The Perseus computational platform for comprehensive analysis of (prote)omics data , 2016, Nature Methods.

[10]  Christopher S. Hughes,et al.  Extending the Compatibility of the SP3 Paramagnetic Bead Processing Approach for Proteomics. , 2018, Journal of proteome research.

[11]  L. Jensen,et al.  Secretome Analysis of Lipid-Induced Insulin Resistance in Skeletal Muscle Cells by a Combined Experimental and Bioinformatics Workflow. , 2015, Journal of proteome research.

[12]  Jeroen Krijgsveld,et al.  Ultrasensitive proteome analysis using paramagnetic bead technology , 2014, Molecular systems biology.

[13]  M. Mann,et al.  Universal sample preparation method for proteome analysis , 2009, Nature Methods.

[14]  J. Olsen,et al.  Off-line high-pH reversed-phase fractionation for in-depth phosphoproteomics. , 2014, Journal of proteome research.

[15]  R. Zahedi,et al.  Impact of digestion conditions on phosphoproteomics. , 2014, Journal of proteome research.

[16]  Edward L. Huttlin,et al.  The BioPlex Network: A Systematic Exploration of the Human Interactome , 2015, Cell.

[17]  A. Alpert Hydrophilic-interaction chromatography for the separation of peptides, nucleic acids and other polar compounds. , 1990, Journal of chromatography.

[18]  A. Deshmukh,et al.  Proteomics Analysis of Skeletal Muscle from Leptin‐Deficient ob/ob Mice Reveals Adaptive Remodeling of Metabolic Characteristics and Fiber Type Composition , 2018, Proteomics.

[19]  M. Mann,et al.  Global, In Vivo, and Site-Specific Phosphorylation Dynamics in Signaling Networks , 2006, Cell.

[20]  Christopher M. Overall,et al.  Proteomic identification of multitasking proteins in unexpected locations complicates drug targeting , 2009, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[21]  Christopher S. Hughes,et al.  Single-pot, solid-phase-enhanced sample preparation for proteomics experiments , 2018, Nature Protocols.

[22]  Edward M Marcotte,et al.  Highly parallel single-molecule identification of proteins in zeptomole-scale mixtures , 2018, Nature Biotechnology.

[23]  T. Rabilloud,et al.  Toward a better analysis of secreted proteins: the example of the myeloid cells secretome , 2007, Proteomics.

[24]  Marion Kee,et al.  Analysis , 2004, Machine Translation.

[25]  J. Wiśniewski,et al.  Fast and sensitive total protein and Peptide assays for proteomic analysis. , 2015, Analytical chemistry.

[26]  M. Mann,et al.  In-gel digestion for mass spectrometric characterization of proteins and proteomes , 2006, Nature Protocols.

[27]  M. Mann,et al.  MaxQuant enables high peptide identification rates, individualized p.p.b.-range mass accuracies and proteome-wide protein quantification , 2008, Nature Biotechnology.

[28]  F. Poulsen,et al.  Using guanidine-hydrochloride for fast and efficient protein digestion and single-step affinity-purification mass spectrometry. , 2013, Journal of proteome research.

[29]  Katrin Eichelbaum,et al.  Selective enrichment of newly synthesized proteins for quantitative secretome analysis , 2012, Nature Biotechnology.