Rejection of micropollutants by clean and fouled forward osmosis membrane.

As forward osmosis (FO) gains attention as an efficient technology to improve wastewater reclamation processes, it is fundamental to determine the influence of fouling in the rejection of emerging contaminants (micropollutants). This study focuses on the rejection of 13 selected micropollutants, spiked in a secondary wastewater effluent, by a FO membrane, using Red Sea water as draw solution (DS), differentiating the effects on the rejection caused by a clean and fouled membrane. The resulting effluent was then desalinated at low pressure with a reverse osmosis (RO) membrane, to produce a high quality permeate and determine the rejection with a coupled forward osmosis - low pressure reverse osmosis (FO-LPRO) system. When considering only FO with a clean membrane, the rejection of the hydrophilic neutral compounds was between 48.6% and 84.7%, for the hydrophobic neutrals the rejection ranged from 40.0% to 87.5%, and for the ionic compounds the rejections were between 92.9% and 96.5%. With a fouled membrane, the rejections were between 44.6% and 95.2%, 48.7%-91.5% and 96.9%-98.6%, respectively. These results suggest that, except for the hydrophilic neutral compounds, the rejection of the micropollutants is increased by the presence of a fouling layer, possibly due to the higher hydrophilicity of the FO fouled membrane compared to the clean one, the increased adsorption capacity of hydrophilic compounds and reduced mass transport capacity, membrane swelling, and the higher negative charge of the membrane surface, related to the foulants composition, mainly NOM acids (carboxylic radicals) and polysaccharides or polysaccharide-like substances. However, when coupled with RO, the rejections in both cases increased above 96%. The coupled FO-LPRO system was an effective double barrier against the selected micropollutants.

[1]  G. Amy,et al.  A QSAR model for predicting rejection of emerging contaminants (pharmaceuticals, endocrine disruptors) by nanofiltration membranes. , 2010, Water research.

[2]  G. Amy,et al.  Proposing nanofiltration as acceptable barrier for organic contaminants in water reuse , 2010 .

[3]  T. Heberer.  Occurrence, fate, and removal of pharmaceutical residues in the aquatic environment: a review of recent research data. , 2002, Toxicology letters.

[4]  B. Van der Bruggen,et al.  The role of electrostatic interactions on the rejection of organic solutes in aqueous solutions with nanofiltration , 2008 .

[5]  G. Amy,et al.  Rejection of pharmaceutically active compounds and endocrine disrupting compounds by clean and fouled nanofiltration membranes. , 2009, Water research.

[6]  L. Nghiem,et al.  Effects of membrane fouling on the nanofiltration of pharmaceutically active compounds (PhACs): Mechanisms and role of membrane pore size , 2007 .

[7]  L. Fan,et al.  Influence of the characteristics of natural organic matter on the fouling of microfiltration membranes. , 2001, Water research.

[8]  Christopher Bellona,et al.  Factors affecting the rejection of organic solutes during NF/RO treatment--a literature review. , 2004, Water research.

[9]  Shane A. Snyder,et al.  Pharmaceuticals, Personal Care Products, and Endocrine Disruptors in Water: Implications for the Water Industry , 2003 .

[10]  D.J.H. Harmsen,et al.  Membrane fouling and process performance of forward osmosis membranes on activated sludge , 2008 .

[11]  Jaeweon Cho,et al.  Characterization of clean and natural organic matter (NOM) fouled NF and UF membranes, and foulants characterization☆ , 1998 .

[12]  Taro Urase,et al.  Change in membrane performance due to organic fouling in nanofiltration (NF)/reverse osmosis (RO) applications , 2007 .

[13]  Adriano Joss,et al.  Scrutinizing pharmaceuticals and personal care products in wastewater treatment. , 2004, Environmental science & technology.

[14]  How Yong Ng,et al.  Influence of colloidal fouling on rejection of trace organic contaminants by reverse osmosis , 2004 .

[15]  Long D. Nghiem,et al.  NF/RO filtration of the hydrophobic ionogenic compound triclosan : Transport mechanisms and the influence of membrane fouling , 2008 .

[16]  M. Wiesner,et al.  Hydrodynamics of permeable aggregates in differential sedimentation , 2003 .

[17]  Jaeweon Cho,et al.  Effects of natural organic matter and ionic species on membrane surface charge. , 2002, Environmental science & technology.

[18]  K Kümmerer,et al.  Biodegradability of some antibiotics, elimination of the genotoxicity and affection of wastewater bacteria in a simple test. , 2000, Chemosphere.

[19]  Christopher Bellona,et al.  Effect of membrane fouling on transport of organic contaminants in NF/RO membrane applications , 2006 .

[20]  K. Kimura,et al.  REJECTION OF ORGANIC MICROPOLLUTANTS (DISINFECTION BY-PRODUCTS, ENDOCRINE DISRUPTING COMPOUNDS, AND PHARMACEUTICALLY ACTIVE COMPOUNDS) BY NF/RO MEMBRANES , 2003 .

[21]  A. E. Greenberg,et al.  Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater : supplement to the sixteenth edition , 1988 .