RPL for accreditation in higher education – As a process of mutual understanding or merely lifeworld colonisation?

This article focuses on a process of recognition of prior learning (RPL) in higher education. It is based on experiences from a project carried out in collaboration between the University of Lund, Linköping University and two trade unions in Sweden. The aim of the project was to find ways of recognising prior learning for accreditation of course credits at university level. In the project and its analysis, Habermas’ theory of communicative action was used as theoretical underpinning. During the project we carried out a thematic analysis based on interviews. The analysis suggested that the participants had a mystified view of higher education that RPL must be considered a learning process and that the participants’ prior learning can be characterised as practical wisdom. These themes guided the development of the project. In a retrospective analysis, language proficiency seemed to play a significant role for the outcome of the process. The conclusion suggests that a more fair and valid assessment of the participant’s prior learning could be accomplished by focusing on RPL as a process of mutual understanding. However, a critical appraisal of the process suggests that RPL for accreditation is problematic and could be seen as a colonisation of the lifeworld.

[1]  Helen Peters,et al.  Contested discourses: assessing the outcomes of learning from experience for the award of credit in higher education , 2005 .

[2]  J. Castle,et al.  Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL) for access or credit? Problematic issues in a university adult education department in South Africa , 2001 .

[3]  Per Andersson,et al.  Re-theorising the recognition of prior learning , 2006 .

[4]  Tova Stenlund,et al.  Assessment of prior learning in higher education: a review from a validity perspective , 2010 .

[5]  D. Starr-Glass Metaphor and Totem: Exploring and evaluating prior experiential learning , 2002 .

[6]  C. Chisholm,et al.  Analysis and evaluation of factors relating to accrediting 100% of prior experiential learning in UK work‐based awards , 2007 .

[7]  Dragan Milovanovic,et al.  Book Review: Review of the Theory of Communicative Action, Volume One: Reason and the Rationalization of Society , 1986 .

[8]  D. Anderson,et al.  The hidden curriculum. , 1992, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[9]  Andreas Fejes,et al.  Grading systems, features of assessment and students’ approaches to learning , 2009 .

[10]  J. Habermas The Theory of Communicative Action: Reason and the Rationalization of Society , 1986 .

[11]  New courses for Trojan horses: rethinking RPL in a South African teacher education curriculum , 2009 .

[12]  D. Starr-Glass,et al.  A Liminal Space: Challenges and opportunities in accreditation of prior learning in Judaic Studies , 2003 .

[13]  J. Aultman The Hidden Curriculum , 2007 .

[14]  J. Harris Ways of Seeing the Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL): What Contribution Can Such Practices Make to Social Inclusion? , 1999 .

[15]  Marjorie C. Kirkland The Effects of Tests on Students and Schools , 1971 .

[16]  A. Valk Recognition of prior and experiential learning in European universities , 2009 .

[17]  C. Miller,et al.  Up to the Mark: A Study of the Examination Game. , 1974 .

[18]  G. Warnke Gadamer: Hermeneutics, Tradition, and Reason , 1987 .

[19]  F. C. P. Motta The theory of communicative action , 1991 .

[20]  E. Husserl,et al.  The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology: An Introduction to Phenomenological Philosophy , 1936 .

[21]  J. Habermas,et al.  The Theory of Communicative Action, Vol. 1, Reason and the Rationalization of Society , 1986 .