Engaged Listenership in Spoken Academic Discourse: The Case of Student-Tutor Meetings.

Abstract This article uses a corpus of spoken English from an Irish university setting to examine how engaged listenership is signaled in meetings between tutors and graduate students. The various linguistic devices employed by both parties for this purpose are quantified and functionally analysed. The three strategies examined include minimal response tokens, for example, mm hm, mm, yeah, non-minimal response tokens e.g. really, right, fine, good, and simultaneous speech and interruptions. These items are found to differ quantitatively and functionally and are shown to be highly relevant for the effective functioning of students in such a spoken EAP context. Pedagogic implications are presented.

[1]  C. Goodwin The Interactive Construction of a Sentence in Natural Conversation , 1979 .

[2]  D. Tannen Spoken and written language : exploring orality and literacy , 1984 .

[3]  B. Thorne,et al.  Language and Sex: Difference and Dominance , 1975 .

[4]  S. Krashen Second Language Acquisition and Second Language Learning , 1988 .

[5]  S. Duncan,et al.  On signalling that it's your turn to speak☆ , 1974 .

[6]  Robert Hopper,et al.  Some Uses of Yeah , 1993 .

[7]  S. Jacobs Narrative, Literacy and Face in Interethnic Communication , 1981 .

[8]  J. Sinclair,et al.  Towards an Analysis of Discourse: The English Used by Teachers and Pupils , 1975 .

[9]  S. Murray POWER AND SOLIDARITY IN “INTERRUPTION”: A CRITIQUE OF THE SANTA BARBARA SCHOOL CONCEPTION AND ITS APPLICATION BY ORCUTT AND HARVEY (1985) , 1987 .

[10]  Ronald Carter,et al.  Speaking Englishes, Speaking Cultures, Using CANCODE. , 1997 .

[11]  Anna M. Fellegy Patterns and functions of minimal response , 1995 .

[12]  Douglas Biber,et al.  Using corpora to explore linguistic variation , 2002 .

[13]  R. Carter,et al.  Spoken grammar: what is it and how can we teach it? , 1995 .

[14]  Susan Conrad,et al.  Will Corpus Linguistics Revolutionize Grammar Teaching in the 21st Century , 2000 .

[15]  S. Murray The sound of simultaneous speech, the meaning of interruption: A rejoinder , 1988 .

[16]  Gail Jefferson,et al.  Notes on a systematic deployment of the acknowledgement tokens “Yeah”; and “Mm Hm”; , 1984 .

[17]  Reece Mm,et al.  Expressive movements, warmth, and verbal reinforcement. , 1962 .

[18]  Fiona Farr,et al.  Would as a hedging device in an Irish context: an intra-varietal comparison of institutionalised spoken interaction , 2002 .

[19]  V. Yngve On getting a word in edgewise , 1970 .

[20]  Charles Carpenter Fries,et al.  The Structure of English , 1954 .

[21]  Rod Gardner The Listener and Minimal Responses in Conversational Interaction. , 1997 .

[22]  Y. Rim Personality variables and interruptions in small discussions , 1977 .

[23]  Cindy Gallois,et al.  Turn Taking: Social Personality and Conversational Style , 1975 .

[24]  Suresh Canagarajah,et al.  Multilingual writers and the academic community: towards a critical relationship , 2002 .

[25]  E. Schegloff Discourse as an interactional achievement : Some uses of "Uh huh" and other things that come between sentences , 1982 .

[26]  Robert Hopper,et al.  Back Channels Revisited: Acknowledgment Tokens and Speakership Incipiency , 1993 .

[27]  Mark Warschauer,et al.  The Changing Global Economy and the Future of English Teaching , 2000 .

[28]  J. Jaffe,et al.  Vocal interruptions in dyadic communication as a function of speech and social anxiety. , 1979, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[29]  Penelope Brown,et al.  Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage , 1989 .

[30]  S. Maynard Analyzing interactional management in native/non-native English conversation : A case of listener response , 1997 .

[31]  John M. Swales,et al.  Literacy and disciplinary practices: opening and closing perspectives , 2002 .

[32]  Guy Cook,et al.  Principle and Practice in Applied Linguistics: Studies in Honour of H. G. Widdowson , 1995 .

[33]  E. Schegloff,et al.  The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation , 1977 .

[34]  G. Psathas Everyday language : studies in ethnomethodology , 1981 .

[35]  G. Beattie Interruption in conversational interaction, and its relation to the sex and status of the interactants* , 1981 .

[36]  Alastair Pennycook,et al.  Vulgar Pragmatism, Critical Pragmatism, and EAP. , 1997 .

[37]  S. Duncan,et al.  On the structure of speaker–auditor interaction during speaking turns , 1974, Language in Society.

[38]  C. Goodwin Between and within: Alternative sequential treatments of continuers and assessments , 1986 .

[39]  Sheida White Backchannels across cultures: A study of Americans and Japanese , 1989, Language in Society.

[40]  Jim Cummins Academic Language Learning, Transformative Pedagogy, and Information Technology: Towards a Critical Balance , 2000 .

[41]  Wayne A. Beach,et al.  Transitional regularities for ‘casual’ “Okay” usages , 1993 .

[42]  Back-channels revisited , 1990 .

[43]  Rod Gardner,et al.  The Conversation Object Mm: A Weak and Variable Acknowledging Token , 1997 .

[44]  D. P. Hayes,et al.  Interruption Outcomes and Vocal Amplitude: Explorations in Social Psychophysics. , 1971 .

[45]  Donald W. Fiske,et al.  Face-to-face interaction: Research, methods, and theory , 1977 .

[46]  S. Maynard Conversation management in contrast: Listener response in Japanese and American English , 1990 .

[47]  R. Krauss,et al.  Dominance and accommodation in the conversational behaviours of same- and mixed-gender dyads. , 1988 .

[48]  Ronald V. White,et al.  Back channelling, repair, pausing, and private speech , 1997 .

[49]  Michael McCarthy,et al.  Spoken Language and Applied Linguistics , 1998 .

[50]  D. H. Zimmerman,et al.  9. Sex roles, interruptions and silences in conversation , 1996 .

[51]  A. O'Keeffe,et al.  Using Language Corpora in Initial Teacher Education: Pedagogic Issues and Practical Applications , 2003 .

[52]  Gene H. Lerner Notes on overlap management in conversation: The case of delayed completion , 1989 .

[53]  A. Lomax Cross cultural factors in phonological change , 1973, Language in Society.

[54]  K. Hyland,et al.  EAP: Issues and directions , 2002 .

[55]  Gabriele Kasper,et al.  Phatic, Metalingual and Metacommunicative Functions in Discourse: Gambits and Repairs. , 1982 .

[56]  N. Ferguson,et al.  Simultaneous speech, interruptions and dominance , 1977 .

[57]  B. He,et al.  Discourse Analysis and Teaching of Listening , 2003 .

[58]  R. Jordan,et al.  The growth of EAP in Britain , 2002 .

[59]  Guy Cook The uses of reality: a reply to Ronald Carter , 1998 .

[60]  Impromptu speech : a symposium , 1986 .

[61]  Don H. Zimmerman,et al.  Acknowledgment Tokens and Speakership Incipiency Revisited , 1993 .

[62]  A. Dittmann,et al.  Relationship between vocalizations and head nods as listener responses. , 1968, Journal of personality and social psychology.