A computational model of depth perception based on headcentric disparity

It is now well established that depth is coded by local horizontal disparity and global vertical disparity. We present a computational model which explains how depth is extracted from these two types of disparities. The model uses the two (one for each eye) headcentric directions of binocular targets, derived from retinal signals and oculomotor signals. Headcentric disparity is defined as the difference between headcentric directions of corresponding features in the left and right eye's images. Using Helmholtz's coordinate systems we decompose headcentric disparity into azimuthal and elevational disparity. Elevational disparities of real objects are zero if the signals which contribute to headcentric disparity do not contain any errors. Azimuthal headcentric disparity is a 1D quantity from which an exact equation relating distance and disparity can be derived. The equation is valid for all headcentric directions and for all binocular fixation positions. Such an equation does not exist if disparity is expressed in retinal coordinates. Possible types of errors in oculomotor signals (six) produce global elevational disparity fields which are characterised by different gradients in the azimuthal and elevational directions. Computations show that the elevational disparity fields uniquely characterise both the type and size of the errors in oculomotor signals. Our model uses a measure of the global elevational disparity field together with local azimuthal disparity to accurately derive headcentric distance throughout the visual field. The model explains existing data on whole-field disparity transformations as well as hitherto unexplained aspects of stereoscopic depth perception.

[1]  Casper J. Erkelens,et al.  Fusional limits for a large random-dot stereogram , 1988, Vision Research.

[2]  D. Regan,et al.  Necessary conditions for the perception of motion in depth. , 1986, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[3]  A. GLENNERSTER,et al.  Stereoscopic Depth Constancy Depends on the Subject's Task , 1996, Vision Research.

[4]  CASPER J ERKELENS,et al.  Capture of Visual Direction: an Unexpected Phenomenon in Binocular Vision , 1997, Vision Research.

[5]  R. Andersen.  Visual and eye movement functions of the posterior parietal cortex. , 1989, Annual review of neuroscience.

[6]  James A. Crowell,et al.  Horizontal and vertical disparity, eye position, and stereoscopic slant perception , 1999, Vision Research.

[7]  Perceptual constraints leading to the evolution of partial decussation , 1994 .

[8]  Daphna Weinshall,et al.  Qualitative Depth from Stereo, with Applications , 1990, Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process..

[9]  I. Howard,et al.  Relative Size Disparities and the Perception of Surface Slant , 1996, Vision Research.

[10]  J. E. W. Mayhew,et al.  Vertical disparity pooling and the induced effect , 1984, Nature.

[11]  H. Collewijn,et al.  Eye movements and stereopsis during dichoptic viewing of moving random-dot stereograms , 1985, Vision Research.

[12]  I. Howard,et al.  Spatial Properties of Shear Disparity Processing , 1997, Vision Research.

[13]  C. Erkelens,et al.  Binocular Perception of Slant about Oblique Axes Relative to a Visual Frame of Reference , 1995, Perception.

[14]  J. M. Foley.  Binocular distance perception. , 1980, Psychological review.

[15]  H. Collewijn,et al.  Motion perception during dichoptic viewing of moving random-dot stereograms , 1985, Vision Research.

[16]  H. C. Longuet-Higgins.  The Role of the Vertical Dimension in Stereoscopic Vision , 1982, Perception.

[17]  Robert Fox,et al.  Stereopsis during continuous head motion , 1984, Vision Research.

[18]  The Perception of Shape from Binocular Disparity Cues , 1960 .

[19]  M F Bradshaw,et al.  Disparity Scaling and the Perception of Frontoparallel Surfaces , 1995, Perception.

[20]  E. Johnston.  Systematic distortions of shape from stereopsis , 1991, Vision Research.

[21]  H Collewijn,et al.  Binocular eye movements and the perception of depth. , 1990, Reviews of oculomotor research.

[22]  R. Carpenter,et al.  Movements of the Eyes , 1978 .

[23]  T. Collett,et al.  Does vertical disparity scale the perception of stereoscopic depth? , 1991, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[24]  Hermann von Helmholtz,et al.  Treatise on Physiological Optics , 1962 .

[25]  B Gillam,et al.  The role of vertical disparity in the scaling of stereoscopic depth perception: An empirical and theoretical study , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[26]  Ian P. Howard,et al.  Binocular Vision and Stereopsis , 1996 .

[27]  R. M. Siegel,et al.  Encoding of spatial location by posterior parietal neurons. , 1985, Science.

[28]  C. Erkelens,et al.  Stability of Binocular Depth Perception with Moving Head and Eyes , 1996, Vision Research.

[29]  S. McKee,et al.  Steroscopic acuity for moving retinal images. , 1978, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[30]  J. Koenderink,et al.  Monocular aniseikonia: a motion parallax analogue of the disparity-induced effect , 1986, Nature.

[31]  A. V. van den Berg,et al.  Binocular eye orientation during fixations: Listing's law extended to include eye vergence. , 1993, Vision research.

[32]  R. Carpenter.  Movements of the eyes, 2nd rev. & enlarged ed. , 1988 .

[33]  A. V. D. Berg,et al.  Binocular eye orientation during fixations: Listing's law extended to include eye vergence , 1993, Vision Research.

[34]  K. N. Ogle.  Researches in binocular vision. , 1950 .

[35]  Robert E. Bannon,et al.  SPATIAL SENSE AND MOVEMENTS OF THE EYE , 1948 .

[36]  A. Logvinenko,et al.  Convergence as a Cue for Distance , 1994, Perception.

[37]  Raymond van Ee,et al.  Temporal aspects of stereoscopic slant estimation: an evaluation and extension of Howard and Kaneko's theory , 1998, Vision Research.

[38]  Casper J. Erkelens,et al.  Capture of the visual direction of monocular objects by adjacent binocular objects , 1997, Vision Research.

[39]  D Tweed,et al.  Implications of rotational kinematics for the oculomotor system in three dimensions. , 1987, Journal of neurophysiology.

[40]  B. Julesz.  Binocular depth perception of computer-generated patterns , 1960 .

[41]  S Thorpe,et al.  Modulation of neural stereoscopic processing in primate area V1 by the viewing distance. , 1992, Science.

[42]  B. G. Cumming,et al.  Vertical disparities and perception of three-dimensional shape , 1991, Nature.

[43]  I. Howard,et al.  Relative shear disparities and the perception of surface inclination , 1994, Vision Research.

[44]  Hirohiko Kaneko,et al.  Spatial limitation of vertical-size disparity processing , 1997, Vision Research.

[45]  M F Bradshaw,et al.  Vertical disparities, differential perspective and binocular stereopsis , 1993, Nature.

[46]  T S Collett,et al.  The Interaction of Oculomotor Cues and Stimulus Size in Stereoscopic Depth Constancy , 1991, Perception.

[47]  Lei Liu,et al.  A polar coordinate system for describing binocular disparity , 1994, Vision Research.

[48]  Martin S. Banks,et al.  Extra-retinal and perspective cues cause the small range of the induced effect , 1998, Vision Research.

[49]  Ian P. Howard,et al.  Human visual orientation , 1982 .

[50]  J. Porrill,et al.  Stereopsis, vertical disparity and relief transformations , 1995, Vision Research.

[51]  Y Trotter,et al.  Cortical Representation of Visual Three-Dimensional Space , 1995, Perception.

[52]  H. C. Longuet-Higgins,et al.  A computer algorithm for reconstructing a scene from two projections , 1981, Nature.

[53]  R M Steinman,et al.  Vision in the presence of known natural retinal image motion. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[54]  J Mayhew,et al.  The Interpretation of Stereo-Disparity Information: The Computation of Surface Orientation and Depth , 1982, Perception.

[55]  Casper J. Erkelens,et al.  Temporal aspects of binocular slant perception , 1996, Vision Research.