Modeling Wolverine Occurrence Using Aerial Surveys of Tracks in Snow

Abstract We designed a novel approach to determining extent of distribution and area of occupancy for wolverines (Gulo gulo) by using aerial surveys of tracks in snow and hierarchical spatial modeling. In 2005 we used a small, fixed-wing aircraft with pilot and one observer to search 575 of 588 survey units for wolverine tracks in approximately 60,000 km2 of boreal forest in northwestern Ontario, Canada. We used sinuous flight paths to scan open areas in the forest in the 100-km2 survey units. We detected tracks in 138 (24%) of the 575 sampled units. There was strong evidence of occurrence (probability of occurrence >0.80) in 30% of the 588 survey units, weak evidence of occurrence (0.50–0.80) in 12%, weak evidence of absence (0.20–0.50) in 15%, and strong evidence of absence (<0.20) in 43%. Wolverine range comprised 59% of the study area and area of occupancy was 33,400 km2. With information on probability of occurrence and core areas of occupation for wolverines in our study area, resource managers and others can examine factors that influence wolverine distribution patterns and use this information to formulate best management practices that will maintain wolverines on the landscape in the face of increasing resource development. Comparing future survey results with those of our 2005 survey will provide an objective way to assess the efficacy of management practices.

[1]  Ajith H. Perera,et al.  Ecology of a managed terrestrial landscape : patterns and processes of forest landscapes in Ontario , 2000 .

[2]  J. Andrew Royle,et al.  ESTIMATING SITE OCCUPANCY RATES WHEN DETECTION PROBABILITIES ARE LESS THAN ONE , 2002, Ecology.

[3]  KEVIN S. MCKELVEY,et al.  Distribution and Broadscale Habitat Relations of the Wolverine in the Contiguous United States , 2007 .

[4]  J. K. Frey Inferring species distributions in the absence of occurrence records: An example considering wolverine (Gulo gulo) and Canada lynx (Lynx canadensis) in New Mexico , 2006 .

[5]  J. Besag Spatial Interaction and the Statistical Analysis of Lattice Systems , 1974 .

[6]  B A Wintle,et al.  Modeling species-habitat relationships with spatially autocorrelated observation data. , 2006, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[7]  Sw. Banerjee,et al.  Hierarchical Modeling and Analysis for Spatial Data , 2003 .

[8]  Darryl I. MacKenzie,et al.  Designing occupancy studies: general advice and allocating survey effort , 2005 .

[9]  Peter Segerström,et al.  Characteristics of dispersal in wolverines , 2001 .

[10]  D. MacKenzie Modeling the Probability of Resource Use: The Effect of, and Dealing with, Detecting a Species Imperfectly , 2006 .

[11]  GLEN A. SARGEANT,et al.  MARKOV CHAIN MONTE CARLO ESTIMATION OF SPECIES DISTRIBUTIONS: A CASE STUDY OF THE SWIFT FOX IN WESTERN KANSAS , 2005 .

[12]  E. F. Becker A Terrestrial Furbearer Estimator Based on Probability Sampling , 1991 .

[13]  D. MacKenzie WHAT ARE THE ISSUES WITH PRESENCE–ABSENCE DATA FOR WILDLIFE MANAGERS? , 2005 .

[14]  D. MacKenzie Occupancy Estimation and Modeling: Inferring Patterns and Dynamics of Species Occurrence , 2005 .

[15]  Range Experiment Station,et al.  The Scientific basis for conserving forest carnivores , 1994 .