Paper- and computer-based workarounds to electronic health record use at three benchmark institutions.

BACKGROUND Healthcare professionals develop workarounds rather than using electronic health record (EHR) systems. Understanding the reasons for workarounds is important to facilitate user-centered design and alignment between work context and available health information technology tools. OBJECTIVE To examine both paper- and computer-based workarounds to the use of EHR systems in three benchmark institutions. METHODS Qualitative data were collected in 11 primary care outpatient clinics across three healthcare institutions. Data collection methods included direct observation and opportunistic questions. In total, 120 clinic staff and providers and 118 patients were observed. All data were analyzed using previously developed workaround categories and examined for potential new categories. Additionally, workarounds were coded as either paper- or computer-based. RESULTS Findings corresponded to 10 of 11 workaround categories identified in previous research. All 10 of these categories applied to paper-based workarounds; five categories also applied to computer-based workarounds. One new category, no correct path (eg, a desired option did not exist in the computer interface, precipitating a workaround), was identified for computer-based workarounds. The most consistent reasons for workarounds across the three institutions were efficiency, memory, and awareness. CONCLUSIONS Consistent workarounds across institutions suggest common challenges in outpatient clinical settings and failures to accommodate these challenges in EHR design. An examination of workarounds provides insight into how providers adapt to limiting EHR systems. Part of the design process for computer interfaces should include user-centered methods particular to providers and healthcare settings to ensure uptake and usability.

[1]  Alissa L. Russ,et al.  Paper persistence, workarounds, and communication breakdowns in computerized consultation management , 2011, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[2]  E. Balas,et al.  Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[3]  Joan S. Ash,et al.  Some Unintended Consequences of Clinical Decision Support Systems , 2007, AMIA.

[4]  Tosha B. Wetterneck,et al.  Technology Evaluation: Workarounds to Barcode Medication Administration Systems: Their Occurrences, Causes, and Threats to Patient Safety , 2008, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[5]  Alastair Baker,et al.  Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[6]  Dean F. Sittig,et al.  Rapid Assessment of Clinical Information Systems in the Healthcare Setting , 2010, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[7]  R. Wears.  The chart is dead--long live the chart. , 2008, Annals of emergency medicine.

[8]  David W. Bates,et al.  Improving completeness of electronic problem lists through clinical decision support: a randomized, controlled trial , 2012, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[9]  Michelle L. Rogers,et al.  Compliance With Intended Use of Bar Code Medication Administration in Acute and Long-Term Care: An Observational Study , 2006, Hum. Factors.

[10]  Dean F. Sittig,et al.  Computerized Provider Order Entry Adoption: Implications for Clinical Workflow , 2008, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[11]  L. Suchman.  Plans and situated actions , 1987 .

[12]  Jason J. Saleem,et al.  Provider Perceptions of Colorectal Cancer Screening Clinical Decision Support at Three Benchmark Institutions , 2009, AMIA.

[13]  John C. Hall,et al.  Patient Safety: A Human Factors Approach , 2012 .

[14]  P. Shekelle,et al.  Systematic Review: Impact of Health Information Technology on Quality, Efficiency, and Costs of Medical Care , 2006, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[15]  Elaine H. Ferneley,et al.  Resist, comply or workaround? An examination of different facets of user engagement with information systems , 2006, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[16]  Alissa L. Russ,et al.  Exploring the persistence of paper with the electronic health record , 2009, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[17]  Jonathan M. Teich,et al.  Using information systems to measure and improve quality , 1999, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[18]  Jonathon R. B. Halbesleben,et al.  Research Paper: Technology Implementation and Workarounds in the Nursing Home , 2008, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[19]  Penelope M. Sanderson,et al.  Distributed Prospective Memory: An Approach to Understanding how Nurses Remember Tasks , 2009 .

[20]  Aziz Sheikh,et al.  Integration of a nationally procured electronic health record system into user work practices , 2012, BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making.

[21]  Steven H. Brown,et al.  VistA - U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs national-scale HIS , 2003, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[22]  E Roth,et al.  Evolvable work-centred support systems for command and control: creating systems users can adapt to meet changing demands , 2006, Ergonomics.

[23]  Emily S. Patterson,et al.  Research Paper: Improving Patient Safety by Identifying Side Effects from Introducing Bar Coding in Medication Administration , 2002, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[24]  Peter Fu-Ming Hu,et al.  User-designed information tools to support communication and care coordination in a trauma hospital , 2009, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[25]  Marc Berg,et al.  Extending the understanding of computerized physician order entry: Implications for professional collaboration, workflow and quality of care , 2007, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[26]  L. Kohn,et al.  COMMITTEE ON QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE IN AMERICA , 2000 .

[27]  Sidney Dekker,et al.  Patient Safety: A Human Factors Approach , 2011 .

[28]  Emily S. Patterson,et al.  Exploring barriers and facilitators to the use of computerized clinical reminders. , 2005, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[29]  J. Marc Overhage,et al.  Enhancing an ePrescribing System By Adding Medication Histories and Formularies: the Regenstrief Medication Hub , 2008, AMIA.

[30]  P. Sanderson,et al.  Interruption management in the intensive care unit: Predicting resumption times and assessing distributed support. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[31]  Vimla L. Patel,et al.  Anticipating and addressing the unintended consequences of health IT and policy: a report from the AMIA 2009 Health Policy Meeting , 2011, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[32]  Robert L. Wears,et al.  Health information technology: fallacies and sober realities , 2010, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[33]  L. Kohn,et al.  To Err Is Human : Building a Safer Health System , 2007 .

[34]  et al.,et al.  The Regenstrief Medical Record System: a quarter century experience , 1999, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[35]  Bonnie J Wakefield,et al.  Rework and workarounds in nurse medication administration process: Implications for work processes and patient safety , 2010, Health care management review.

[36]  Robert L. Wears,et al.  User Created Cognitive Artifacts: What can they Teach us about Design of Information Technology? , 2009 .