Visualisation and pre-processing of peptide microarray data.

The data files produced by digitising peptide microarray images contain detailed information on the location, feature, response parameters and quality of each spot on each array. In this chapter, we will describe how such peptide microarray data can be read into the R statistical package and pre-processed in preparation for subsequent comparative or predictive analysis. We illustrate how the information in the data can be visualised using images and graphical displays that highlight the main features, enabling the quality of the data to be assessed and invalid data points to be identified and excluded. The log-ratio of the foreground to background signal is used as a response index. Negative control responses serve as a reference against which "detectable" responses can be defined, and slides incubated with only buffer and secondary antibody help identify false-positive responses from peptides. For peptides that have a detectable response on at least one subarray, and no false-positive response, we use linear mixed models to remove artefacts due to the arrays and their architecture. The resulting normalized responses provide the input data for further analysis.

[1]  Eytan Domany,et al.  Functional immunomics: Microarray analysis of IgG autoantibody repertoires predicts the future response of mice to induced diabetes , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  S. Dudoit,et al.  Normalization for cDNA microarray data: a robust composite method addressing single and multiple slide systematic variation. , 2002, Nucleic acids research.

[3]  Terence P. Speed,et al.  A comparison of normalization methods for high density oligonucleotide array data based on variance and bias , 2003, Bioinform..

[4]  M. Schutkowski,et al.  Pattern Recognition in Pulmonary Tuberculosis Defined by High Content Peptide Microarray Chip Analysis Representing 61 Proteins from M. tuberculosis , 2008, PloS one.

[5]  Lawrence Steinman,et al.  Microarray Profiling of Antibody Responses against Simian-Human Immunodeficiency Virus: Postchallenge Convergence of Reactivities Independent of Host Histocompatibility Type and Vaccine Regimen , 2003, Journal of Virology.

[6]  Marie Reilly,et al.  Validation of peptide epitope microarray experiments and extraction of quality data. , 2007, Journal of immunological methods.

[7]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation response , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Diagnosis of multiple cancer types by shrunken centroids of gene expression , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  Jean YH Yang,et al.  Bioconductor: open software development for computational biology and bioinformatics , 2004, Genome Biology.

[10]  Yudi Pawitan,et al.  Multidimensional local false discovery rate for microarray studies , 2006, Bioinform..

[11]  H. Sampson,et al.  IgE and IgG4 epitope mapping by microarray immunoassay reveals the diversity of immune response to the peanut allergen, Ara h 2. , 2005, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[12]  S. Knudsen,et al.  A new non-linear normalization method for reducing variability in DNA microarray experiments , 2002, Genome Biology.

[13]  John Quackenbush Microarray data normalization and transformation , 2002, Nature Genetics.