Maximizing plant species inventory efficiency by means of remotely sensed spectral distances

Aim Inventorying plant species in an area based on randomly placed quadrats can be quite inefficient. The aim of this paper is to test whether plant species richness can be inventoried more efficiently by means of a spectrally-based ordering of sites to be sampled. Location The study area was a complex wetland ecosystem, the Lake Montepulciano Nature Reserve, central Italy. This is one of the most important wetland areas of central Italy because of the diverse plant communities and the seasonal avifauna. Methods Field sampling, based on a random stratified sampling design, was performed in June 2002. Plant species composition was recorded within sampling units of 100 m 2 (plots) and 1 ha (macroplots). A QuickBird multispectral image of the same date was acquired and corrected both geometrically and radiometrically. Species accumulation curves based on spectral information were obtained by ordering sites to be sampled according to a maximum spectral distance criterion (i.e. by ordering sampling units based on the maximum distances among them in a four-dimensional spectral space derived from the remotely sensed data). Different distance measures based on mean and maximum spectral distances among sampling units were tested. The performance of the species accumulation curve derived by the spectrally-based ordering of sampling units was tested against a rarefaction curve obtained from the mean of 10,000 accumulation curves based on randomly ordered sampling units. Results The spectrally-derived curve based on the maximum spectral distance among sampling units showed the most rapid accumulation of species, well above the rarefaction curve, at both the plot and the macroplot scales. Other ordering criteria of sampling units captured less richness over most of the species accumulation curves at both the spatial scales. The accumulation curves based on other measurements of distance were much closer to the random curve and did not show differences with respect to the species rarefaction curve based on random ordering of sampling units. Main conclusions The present investigation demonstrated that spectral-based ordering of sites to be sampled can lead to the maximization of the efficiency of plant species inventories, an activity usually driven by the ‘botanist’s internal algorithm’ (intuition), without any formalized rule to drive field sampling. The proposed approach can reduce costs of plant species inventorying through a more efficient allotment of time and sampling.

[1]  R. Whittaker Evolution and measurement of species diversity , 1972 .

[2]  H. Qian Large‐scale biogeographic patterns of vascular plant richness in North America: an analysis at the generic level , 1998 .

[3]  K. I. Ugland,et al.  The species–accumulation curve and estimation of species richness , 2003 .

[4]  Steven N. Handel,et al.  A century of change in the Staten Island flora: Ecological correlates of species losses and invasions' , 1994 .

[5]  S. Scheiner Six types of species‐area curves , 2003 .

[6]  A. Skidmore,et al.  Interannual variability of NDVI and species richness in Kenya , 2002 .

[7]  P. Groves,et al.  Methodology For Hyperspectral Band Selection , 2004 .

[8]  L. Grossi,et al.  Spatial‐Accumulation Pattern and Extinction Rates of Mediterranean Flora as Related to Species Confinement to Habitats in Preserves and Larger Areas , 2002 .

[9]  Christopher Small,et al.  The Landsat ETM+ spectral mixing space , 2004 .

[10]  Duccio Rocchini,et al.  Testing the spectral variation hypothesis by using satellite multispectral images , 2004 .

[11]  David B. Clark,et al.  Application of merged 1-m and 4-m resolution satellite data to research and management in tropical forests , 2003 .

[12]  T. Kučera,et al.  Plant species richness of nature reserves: the interplay of area, climate and habitat in a central European landscape , 2002, Global ecology and biogeography : a journal of macroecology.

[13]  P. Chavez Image-Based Atmospheric Corrections - Revisited and Improved , 1996 .

[14]  W. Gould REMOTE SENSING OF VEGETATION, PLANT SPECIES RICHNESS, AND REGIONAL BIODIVERSITY HOTSPOTS , 2000 .

[15]  Keith Kirby,et al.  Changes in the ground flora in Wytham Woods, southern England from 1974 to 1991 - implications for nature conservation. , 2000 .

[16]  T. Koellner,et al.  Rarefaction method for assessing plant species diversity on a regional scale , 2004 .

[17]  K. McGwire,et al.  Patterns of floristic richness in vegetation communities of California: regional scale analysis with multi-temporal NDVI , 2004 .

[18]  G. Halffter,et al.  Assessing the completeness of bat biodiversity inventories using species accumulation curves , 2000 .

[19]  G. Perry,et al.  Performance of nonparametric species richness estimators in a high diversity plant community , 2003 .

[20]  Kevin J. Gaston,et al.  Optimisation in reserve selection procedures—why not? , 2002 .

[21]  P. White,et al.  The distance decay of similarity in biogeography and ecology , 1999 .

[22]  Maria Laura Carranza,et al.  Computing β-diversity from species-area curves , 2002 .

[23]  Robert K. Colwell,et al.  Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness , 2001 .

[24]  A. Chiarucci,et al.  Evaluation and monitoring of the flora in a nature reserve by estimation methods , 2001 .

[25]  Risto K. Heikkinen,et al.  Complementarity and other key criteria in the conservation of herb-rich forests in Finland , 2002, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[26]  K. R. W. Brewer,et al.  The use of gradient directed transects or gradsects in natural resource surveys , 1985 .

[27]  Mark Cutler,et al.  Remote sensing of upland vegetation: the potential of high spatial resolution satellite sensors , 2004 .

[28]  Thomas Wohlgemuth,et al.  Quantitative tools for perfecting species lists , 2002 .

[29]  Risto Päivinen,et al.  Assessment of Biodiversity for Improved Forest Planning , 1998, Forestry Sciences.

[30]  Gary L. Wade,et al.  Standards for the writing of floras , 1995 .

[31]  John E. Estes,et al.  A remote sensing research agenda for mapping and monitoring biodiversity , 1993 .

[32]  Robert K. Colwell,et al.  Estimating terrestrial biodiversity through extrapolation. , 1994, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[33]  Lorenzo Fattorini,et al.  Resampling estimators of specie richness from presence-absence data: why they don't work , 2002 .

[34]  H. Nagendra Using remote sensing to assess biodiversity , 2001 .

[35]  J. Kerr,et al.  Remotely sensed habitat diversity predicts butterfly species richness and community similarity in Canada , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[36]  T. Sparks,et al.  The flora of a cultural landscape: environmental determinants of change revealed using archival sources. , 2000 .

[37]  Giles M. Foody,et al.  Tree biodiversity in protected and logged Bornean tropical rain forests and its measurement by satellite remote sensing , 2003 .

[38]  Species accumulation and species area curves — a comment on Scheiner (2003) , 2004 .

[39]  James D. Nichols,et al.  Monitoring of biological diversity in space and time , 2001 .

[40]  Jochen Schiewe Status and future perspectives of the application potential of digital airborne sensor systems , 2005 .

[41]  J. Diamond,et al.  Factors controlling species diversity: overview and synthesis , 1988 .

[42]  R. Moss Context Matters. Considerations for Large-Scale Conservation , 2002 .