ITR-Seq, a next-generation sequencing assay, identifies genome-wide DNA editing sites in vivo following adeno-associated viral vector-mediated genome editing

Background Identifying nuclease-induced double-stranded breaks in DNA on a genome-wide scale is critical for assessing the safety and efficacy of genome editing therapies. We previously demonstrated that after administering adeno-associated viral (AAV) vector-mediated genome-editing strategies in vivo, vector sequences integrated into the host organism’s genomic DNA at double-stranded breaks. Thus, identifying the genomic location of inserted AAV sequences would enable us to identify DSB events, mainly derived from the nuclease on- and off-target activity. Results Here, we developed a next-generation sequencing assay that detects insertions of specific AAV vector sequences called inverted terminal repeats (ITRs). This assay, ITR-Seq, enables us to identify off-target nuclease activity in vivo. Using ITR-Seq, we analyzed liver DNA samples of rhesus macaques treated with AAV vectors expressing a meganuclease. We found dose-dependent off-target activity and reductions in off-target events induced by further meganuclease development. In mice, we identified the genomic locations of ITR integration after treatment with Cas9 nucleases and their corresponding single-guide RNAs. Conclusions In sum, ITR-Seq is a powerful method for identifying off-target sequences induced by AAV vector-delivered genome-editing nucleases. ITR-Seq will help us understand the specificity and efficacy of different genome-editing nucleases in animal models and clinical studies. This information can help enhance the safety profile of gene-editing therapies.

[1]  Theresa A. Storm,et al.  AAV serotype 2 vectors preferentially integrate into active genes in mice , 2003, Nature Genetics.

[2]  P. Duchateau,et al.  Meganucleases and Other Tools for Targeted Genome Engineering: Perspectives and Challenges for Gene Therapy , 2011, Current gene therapy.

[3]  D. Housman,et al.  Targeted integration of adeno‐associated virus (AAV) into human chromosome 19. , 1991, The EMBO journal.

[4]  G. Crooks,et al.  WebLogo: a sequence logo generator. , 2004, Genome research.

[5]  Martin J. Aryee,et al.  GUIDE-Seq enables genome-wide profiling of off-target cleavage by CRISPR-Cas nucleases , 2014, Nature Biotechnology.

[6]  Daniel G. Miller,et al.  AAV Vector Integration Sites in Mouse Hepatocellular Carcinoma , 2007, Science.

[7]  Pilar Blancafort,et al.  Zinc Fingers, TALEs, and CRISPR Systems: A Comparison of Tools for Epigenome Editing. , 2018, Methods in molecular biology.

[8]  Theresa A. Storm,et al.  Large-Scale Molecular Characterization of Adeno-Associated Virus Vector Integration in Mouse Liver , 2005, Journal of Virology.

[9]  A. Nussenzweig,et al.  DNA Breaks and End Resection Measured Genome-wide by End Sequencing. , 2016, Molecular cell.

[10]  Leslie S. Edwards,et al.  Mapping the genomic landscape of CRISPR–Cas9 cleavage , 2017, Nature Methods.

[11]  A. Elkahloun,et al.  Vector design influences hepatic genotoxicity after adeno-associated virus gene therapy. , 2015, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[12]  J. Joung,et al.  CIRCLE-seq: a highly sensitive in vitro screen for genome-wide CRISPR-Cas9 nuclease off-targets , 2017, Nature Methods.

[13]  M. Rowicka,et al.  Nucleotide-resolution DNA double-strand breaks mapping by next-generation sequencing , 2013, Nature Methods.

[14]  Xiaoling Wang,et al.  Unbiased detection of off-target cleavage by CRISPR-Cas9 and TALENs using integrase-defective lentiviral vectors , 2015, Nature Biotechnology.

[15]  Stephan Wolf,et al.  Genome-wide high-throughput integrome analyses by nrLAM-PCR and next-generation sequencing , 2010, Nature Protocols.

[16]  Sabina Sánchez-Hernández,et al.  Biased and Unbiased Methods for the Detection of Off-Target Cleavage by CRISPR/Cas9: An Overview , 2016, International journal of molecular sciences.

[17]  A. Bradley,et al.  Repair of double-strand breaks induced by CRISPR–Cas9 leads to large deletions and complex rearrangements , 2018, Nature Biotechnology.

[18]  Michel Sadelain,et al.  Highly Divergent Integration Profile of Adeno-Associated Virus Serotype 5 Revealed by High-Throughput Sequencing , 2013, Journal of Virology.

[19]  S. Grizot,et al.  The I-CreI meganuclease and its engineered derivatives: applications from cell modification to gene therapy. , 2011, Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS.

[20]  Jeffry D. Sander,et al.  CRISPR-Cas systems for editing, regulating and targeting genomes , 2014, Nature Biotechnology.

[21]  Stephan Wolf,et al.  A largely random AAV integration profile after LPLD gene therapy , 2013, Nature Medicine.

[22]  J. Yee Off‐target effects of engineered nucleases , 2016, The FEBS journal.

[23]  A. Iafrate,et al.  Anchored multiplex PCR for targeted next-generation sequencing , 2014, Nature Medicine.

[24]  I. Longden,et al.  EMBOSS: the European Molecular Biology Open Software Suite. , 2000, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[25]  Daniel G. Miller,et al.  Adeno-associated virus vectors integrate at chromosome breakage sites , 2004, Nature Genetics.

[26]  K. L. La Perle,et al.  Patterns of scAAV vector insertion associated with oncogenic events in a mouse model for genotoxicity. , 2012, Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy.

[27]  M. Rots,et al.  The influence of eukaryotic chromatin state on CRISPR-Cas9 editing efficiencies. , 2019, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[28]  D. Ward,et al.  Mapping and direct visualization of a region-specific viral DNA integration site on chromosome 19q13-qter. , 1991, Genomics.

[29]  R. Chandler,et al.  Recombinant Adeno-Associated Viral Integration and Genotoxicity: Insights from Animal Models. , 2017, Human gene therapy.

[30]  Lynne,et al.  Site-specific integration by adeno-associated virus. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  Erik L. G. Wernersson,et al.  BLISS is a versatile and quantitative method for genome-wide profiling of DNA double-strand breaks , 2017, Nature Communications.

[32]  Jessica Zucman-Rossi,et al.  Recurrent AAV2-related insertional mutagenesis in human hepatocellular carcinomas , 2015, Nature Genetics.

[33]  Martin J. Aryee,et al.  High levels of AAV vector integration into CRISPR-induced DNA breaks , 2019, Nature Communications.

[34]  Jong-il Kim,et al.  Digenome-seq: genome-wide profiling of CRISPR-Cas9 off-target effects in human cells , 2015, Nature Methods.

[35]  Jeffrey C. Miller,et al.  An unbiased genome-wide analysis of zinc-finger nuclease specificity , 2011, Nature Biotechnology.

[36]  Lili Wang,et al.  AAV8-mediated hepatic gene transfer in infant rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). , 2011, Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy.

[37]  K. High,et al.  Therapeutic in vivo gene transfer for genetic disease using AAV: progress and challenges , 2011, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[38]  Mingyao Li,et al.  Meganuclease targeting of PCSK9 in macaque liver leads to stable reduction in serum cholesterol , 2018, Nature Biotechnology.

[39]  Charles Girardot,et al.  Je, a versatile suite to handle multiplexed NGS libraries with unique molecular identifiers , 2016, BMC Bioinformatics.

[40]  Jia Gu,et al.  fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor , 2018, bioRxiv.

[41]  Daniel G. Miller,et al.  Large-Scale Analysis of Adeno-Associated Virus Vector Integration Sites in Normal Human Cells , 2005, Journal of Virology.

[42]  Martin J. Aryee,et al.  Defining CRISPR–Cas9 genome-wide nuclease activities with CIRCLE-seq , 2018, Nature Protocols.

[43]  A. Quinlan BEDTools: The Swiss‐Army Tool for Genome Feature Analysis , 2014, Current protocols in bioinformatics.