The geographic distribution of breast cancer incidence in Massachusetts 1988 to 1997, adjusted for covariates

BackgroundThe aims of this study were to determine whether observed geographic variations in breast cancer incidence are random or statistically significant, whether statistically significant excesses are temporary or time-persistent, and whether they can be explained by covariates such as socioeconomic status (SES) or urban/rural status?ResultsA purely spatial analysis found fourteen geographic areas that deviated significantly from randomness: ten with higher incidence rates than expected, four lower than expected. After covariate adjustment, three of the ten high areas remained statistically significant and one new high area emerged. The space-time analysis identified eleven geographic areas as statistically significant, seven high and four low. After covariate adjustment, four of the seven high areas remained statistically significant and a fifth high area also identified in the purely spatial analysis emerged.ConclusionsThese analyses identify geographic areas with invasive breast cancer incidence higher or lower than expected, the times of their excess, and whether or not their status is affected when the model is adjusted for risk factors. These surveillance findings can be a sound starting point for the epidemiologist and has the potential of monitoring time trends for cancer control activities.

[1]  M. Kulldorff,et al.  Breast cancer clusters in the northeast United States: a geographic analysis. , 1997, American journal of epidemiology.

[2]  Martin Kulldorff,et al.  Geographic differences in invasive and in situ breast cancer incidence according to precise geographic coordinates, Connecticut, 1991–95 , 2002, International journal of cancer.

[3]  B. E. F. Isher,et al.  Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. , 2002 .

[4]  Ric Skinner,et al.  Use of a geographic information system to identify and characterize areas with high proportions of distant stage breast cancer. , 2002, Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP.

[5]  J L Freeman,et al.  Geographic variations in breast cancer mortality: do higher rates imply elevated incidence or poorer survival? , 1998, American journal of public health.

[6]  R. G. Parrish,et al.  Guidelines for evaluating surveillance systems. , 1988, MMWR supplements.

[7]  C. Paulu,et al.  Exploring associations between residential location and breast cancer incidence in a case-control study. , 2002, Environmental health perspectives.

[8]  Mary Beth Terry,et al.  The Long Island Breast Cancer Study Project: Description of a Multi-Institutional Collaboration to Identify Environmental Risk Factors for Breast Cancer , 2002, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[9]  J. Manson,et al.  Geographic variation in breast cancer incidence rates in a cohort of U.S. women. , 1997, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[10]  Zdravka Valerianova,et al.  Trends in incidence of various cancers in Bulgaria, 1981-1990. , 1994, International journal of epidemiology.

[11]  M Kulldorff,et al.  Geographic assessment of breast cancer screening by towns, zip codes, and census tracts. , 2000, Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP.

[12]  R. Rudel,et al.  Mapping out a search for environmental causes of breast cancer. , 1996, Public health reports.

[13]  D. West,et al.  Evaluating local differences in breast cancer incidence rates: A census-based methodology (United States) , 1998, Cancer Causes & Control.

[14]  J Benichou,et al.  Proportion of breast cancer cases in the United States explained by well-established risk factors. , 1995, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[15]  C. la Vecchia,et al.  Population attributable risk for breast cancer: diet, nutrition, and physical exercise. , 1998, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[16]  Ivar Heuch,et al.  Population attributable risk for breast cancer: diet, nutrition, and physical exercise. , 2000 .

[17]  R. Hoover,et al.  Geographic variation in mortality from breast cancer among white women in the United States. , 1995, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[18]  J. Hornaday,et al.  Cancer Facts & Figures 2004 , 2004 .

[19]  S. Shapiro,et al.  Breast cancer incidence and determinants of cancer stage in the Western Cape. , 2000, South African medical journal = Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir geneeskunde.

[20]  N. Krieger,et al.  Social class, race/ethnicity, and incidence of breast, cervix, colon, lung, and prostate cancer among Asian, black, Hispanic, and white residents of the San Francisco Bay Area, 1988–92 (United States) , 1999, Cancer Causes & Control.

[21]  N. Krieger.  Overcoming the absence of socioeconomic data in medical records: validation and application of a census-based methodology. , 1992, American journal of public health.

[22]  W. Willett,et al.  Cigarette smoking, cytochrome P450 1A1 polymorphisms, and breast cancer risk in the Nurses' Health Study. , 1998, Cancer research.

[23]  R. Goldbohm,et al.  Socioeconomic status and breast cancer incidence: a prospective cohort study. , 1994, International Journal of Epidemiology.

[24]  W. Wright,et al.  Socioeconomic status and breast cancer incidence in California for different race/ethnic groups , 2001, Cancer Causes & Control.

[25]  S. Melly,et al.  Using GIS and historical records to reconstruct residential exposure to large-scale pesticide application , 2002, Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology.